Search

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is an increasingly prevalent disease in the aging population. Patients with CSDH frequently suffer from concurrent vascular disease or develop secondary thrombotic complications requiring antithrombotic treatment.To determine the safety and impact of early reinitiation of antithrombotics after middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma.This is a single-institution, retrospective study of patients who underwent middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolizations for CSDH. Patient with or without antithrombotic initiation within 5 days postembolization were compared. Primary outcome was the rate of recurrence within 60 days. Secondary outcomes included rate of reoperation, reduction in CSDH thickness, and midline shift.Fifty-seven patients met inclusion criteria. The median age was 66 years (IQR 58-76) with 21.1% females. Sixty-six embolizations were performed. The median length to follow-up was 20 days (IQR 14-44). Nineteen patients (33.3%) had rapid reinitiation of antithrombotics (5 antiplatelet, 11 anticoagulation, and 3 both). Baseline characteristics between the no antithrombotic (no-AT) and the AT groups were similar. The recurrence rate was higher in the AT group (no-AT vs AT, 9.3 vs 30.4%, P = .03). Mean absolute reduction in CSDH thickness and midline shift was similar between groups. Rate of reoperation did not differ (4.7 vs 8.7%, P = .61).Rapid reinitiation of AT after MMA embolization for CSDH leads to higher rates of recurrence with similar rates of reoperation. Care must be taken when initiating antithrombotics after treatment of CSDH with MMA embolization.

Medically refractory idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is frequently treated with venous sinus stenosis stenting with high success rates. Patient selection has been driven almost exclusively by identification of supraphysiological venous pressure gradients across stenotic regions based on theoretical assessment of likelihood of response.To explore the possibility of benefit in low venous pressure gradient patients.Using a single-center, prospectively maintained registry of patients with IIH undergoing venous stenting, we defined treatment groups by gradient pressures of ≤4, 5 to 8, and8 mmHg based on the most frequently previously published thresholds for stenting. Baseline demographics, clinical, and neuro-ophthalmological outcomes (including optical coherence tomography and Humphrey visual fields) were compared.Among 53 patients, the mean age was 32 years and 70% female with a mean body mass index was 36 kg/m 2 . Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The mean change in lumbar puncture opening pressure at 6 months poststenting was similar between the 3 groups (≤4, 5-8, and8 mmHg; 13.4, 12.9, and 12.4 cmH 2 O, P = .47). Papilledema improvement was observed across groups at 6 months (100, 93, and 86, P = .7) as were all clinical symptoms. The mean changes in optical coherence tomography retinal nerve fiber layer (-30, -54, and -104, P = .5) and mean deviation in Humphrey visual fields (60, 64, and 67, P = .5) at 6 weeks were not significantly different.Patients with IH with low venous pressure gradient venous sinus stenosis seem to benefit equally from venous stenting compared with their higher gradient counterparts. Re-evaluation of our restrictive criteria for this potentially vision sparing intervention is warranted. Future prospective confirmatory studies are needed.