Search

Establishing a relationship between gait and posture in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) is essential for PD treatment and rehabilitation. While previous studies have indicated that gait and posture are independent domains in PD, shared neuromechanisms related to gait and posture control and previous studies investigating the relationship between gait and posture parameters in stroke survivors and neurologically healthy older adults have shown a correlated domain. Thus, this study analyzed the relationship of gait and posture domains, primarily through gait temporal sub-phases (i.e., double support and stance phases) and step width. We analyzed the spatial-temporal gait parameters at the self-selected velocity and center of pressure (CoP) during quiet standing of 22 idiopathic PD participants under and without dopaminergic medication conditions. The association between quiet standing and gait variables was assessed through the Spearman test, controlled by age, disease duration, NFoG-Q, and levodopa dosage. In ON medication, CoP area showed a significant correlation with stance phase and total double support; and RMS ML CoP showed a significant correlation with stance phase, total double support, and step width. In OFF medication, CoP area, RMS AP CoP, RMS ML CoP, and ML CoP velocity significantly correlated with stance phase and total double support. By showing the relationship between gait and posture domains in PD, our study adds novel knowledge about the shared gait-posture control, which could collaborate with new approaches during mobility treatment and assessment., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of wearing virtual reality head-mounted goggles (VR) on body sway in young adults. We run two experiments, in which we compared the body sway while standing during the conditions of 1) wearing and non-wearing VR with eyes-opened (experiment #1), 2) wearing and no-wearing VR with eyes-closed (experiment #2), and 3) wearing VR with eyes-opened when the scene was turned on and off (experiment #2). Forty-four (experiment #1) and fifteen (experiment #2) young adults were instructed to remain as still as possible on a force plate for 60-s and performed three trials in each quiet standing condition. The center of pressure (CoP) displacement, mean velocity, root mean square (RMS), area and median frequency of sway were calculated in both experiments. In the experiment #1, wearing VR condition with eyes-opened largely increased the AP and ML CoP displacement, AP mean velocity, AP and ML RMS, and area (p < 0.05) compared to non-wearing VR with eyes-opened. In the experiment #2, no differences were found for any conditions (eyes-closed and eyes-opened with turned on and off VR scene). In conclusion, wearing VR head-mounted goggles increased body sway of young adults during standing postural task, when the individuals were with eyes-opened. However, the effects of wearing VR head-mounted goggles on body sway disappeared when the individuals were with eyes-closed or the google scene was turned off the scene compared to not wearing VR head-mounted goggles with eyes-closed or turned on scene, respectively., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

This study investigated the effects of wearing a head-mounted eye tracker on upright balance during different visual tasks. Twenty five young adults stood upright on a force plate while performing the visual tasks of fixation, horizontal saccades, and eyes closed, during eighteen trials wearing or not a head-mounted eye tracker. While wearing the eye tracker, participants showed a reduction in mean sway amplitude and velocity of the CoP in the AP and ML directions and more regular CoP fluctuations, in the ML axis in all conditions. Higher mean sway amplitude and velocity of CoP were observed during eyes closed than fixation and saccades. Moreover, horizontal saccades reduced mean sway velocity of CoP compared to fixation. Therefore, wearing the eye tracker minimized the body sway of young adults; however, visual task-related effects on postural stability remained unchanged., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Differences in the postural stabilization of older and young adults have been shown to be task-dependent on both visual and postural challenges; however, the gaze behavior during such tasks has rarely been examined. This study investigated the effects of horizontal and vertical saccades on gaze control, center of pressure (CoP) and head displacement of young and older adults on different bases of support. Ten young adults (20.7 ± 3.4 years) and ten older adults (71.6 ± 3.1 years) remained in an upright stance on a force platform wearing an eye-head tracker device. The participants performed 30-second trials according to two bases of support (feet apart and semi-tandem) and three gaze behavior (fixation, horizontal and vertical saccades) conditions. Older adults presented greater CoP amplitude (p < 0.002) and velocity (p < 0.001) (ML axis), and higher head amplitude (ML) (p < 0.002) than young adults during the semi tandem base. Head displacement of both groups presented higher velocity (ML axis) during horizontal (p < 0.001) and vertical saccades (p < 0.01) than the fixation task only on the semi tandem base. There was higher number of fixations (p < 0.001) and lower mean fixation duration (p < 0.001) on the semi-tandem base (p < 0.05). The results showed higher gaze latency variability in vertical saccades for older adults (p < 0.01). Challenging postural tasks may alter postural adjustments and gaze control during saccadic tasks. Particularly, the greater postural instability of older adults increased the gaze latency variability during saccadic tasks, suggesting some deterioration in the posture-gaze relation with aging., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Postural control is influenced by eye movements. Gaze fixation, which comprises a component of ocular vergence, is important in the acquisition of highly specific task information, but its relation to postural control is little investigated. The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of gaze fixation position (central and lateral fixations) on postural sway in young adults. Forty young adults with ages ranging from 20 to 35 years were invited to participate in the study. Postural sway was measured in quiet stance in bipedal support in three 60-s trials under the following conditions: gaze fixation on a target positioned in front of participant, gaze fixation on a target positioned on right side of participant, and gaze fixation on a target positioned on left side of participant. The following center of pressure parameters (COP) in the anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral directions (ML) were analyzed for each of the trials: body sway displacement, mean velocity of sway, root mean square (RMS) of sway, and median frequency. In addition, detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) exponent, in anteroposterior and medio-lateral directions, was calculated. The COP presented greater AP and ML displacement (p<0.03, effect size=1.37; and p<0.03, effect size=1.64, respectively) and RMS AP and ML (p<0.04, effect size=1.66; and p<0.02, effect size=2.50, respectively) for lateral gaze fixation compared to central gaze fixation. These results suggest that gaze fixation on a laterally positioned target increases body sway in anteroposterior and mediolateral directions., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Saccadic eye movements reduce body sway, yet visually pursuing a moving dot seems to increase body sway. However, how these two types of eye movements affect postural control remains ambiguous, particularly for smooth pursuit eye movements. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of saccade and smooth pursuit eye movements on body sway magnitude during low and high frequencies. Ten young adults (19.5 ± 1.9 years) participants were required to stand upright, barefoot for 70s using a bipedal stance, with feet hip width apart, fixating or pursuing a target that was displayed on a monitor positioned 100 cm away from their eyes. Each participant performed three trials using both types of eye movements, in particular, slow and fast saccades, and slow and fast smooth pursuit movements. Body sway was obtained using reflective markers attached to a participant's head and trunk, which were recorded by two video cameras. The results indicated that body sway was reduced during both saccadic eye movements and smooth pursuit movements when compared to fixation, independent of visual frequencies. These results suggested similarities in the control of saccades and smooth pursuit on postural control., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)