Search

• Task complexity for skilled motor practice gave different effects on interlimb transfer between right- and left-handed. • The simple task failed to improve performance on the right hand after left-hand motor practice in right-handed subjects. • The complex task resulted in performance improvement on non-trained hands by contralateral motor practice. • A certain level of appropriate complexity is necessary to detect inter-limb transfers in motor learning in right-handed. Task complexity could affect acquisition efficiency of motor skills and interlimb transfer; however, how task complexity affects interlimb transfer remains unclear. We hypothesized that left- and right-handed participants may have different interlimb transfer efficiency depending on the task complexity. Left-hand (n = 28) and right-hand (n = 28) dominant participants (age = 24.70 ± 4.02 years, male:female = 28:28) performed a finger sequence test with two levels of complexity (simple: one-digit with four fingers vs. complex: two-digit with five fingers) before and after ten trials of 2-min practice each on the same apparatus. The speed and task errors were measured and analyzed. Right-handed participants failed to improve performance on their right hand (non-trained hand) after contralateral left-hand practice in the simple finger sequence task. In contrast, the left-handed participants improved performance on non-trained hands both right and left after contralateral practices. In the complex task, however, both the left- and right-handed participants improved performance on non-trained hands by contralateral practices. Our results showed that task complexity of skilled practice gave different effects on interlimb transfer between right- and left-handed subjects. It appears that a certain level of appropriate complexity is necessary to detect inter-limb transfers in motor learning in right-handed subjects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Children show lower task performance compared to adults when learning a 1D task. • Coordination analyses indicated greater degree of exploration in children. • Children show limited adaptability in matching exploration to task demands. Motor learning in novel tasks requires exploration to find the appropriate coordination patterns to perform the task. Prior work has shown that compared to adults, children show limited exploration when learning a task that required using upper body movements to control a 2D cursor on a screen. Here, by changing the task dimensionality to 1D, we examined two competing hypotheses: whether children show limited exploration as a general strategy, or whether children are suboptimal in adapting their exploration to task dimensionality. Two groups of children (9- and 12-year olds), and one group of adults learned a virtual task that involved learning to control a cursor on the screen using movements of the upper body. Participants practiced the task for a single session with a total of 232 reaching movements. Results showed that 9-year olds show worse task performance relative to adults, as indicated by higher movement times and path lengths. Analysis of the coordination strategies indicated that both groups of children showed lower variance along the first principal component, suggesting that they had greater exploration than adults which was suboptimal for the 1D task. These results suggest that motor learning in children is characterized not by limited exploration per se, but by a limited adaptability in matching motor exploration to task dimensionality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]