Search

Endovascular treatment (EVT) is a powerful treatment for large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke if reperfusion can be achieved, while in cases with failed reperfusion, EVT may cause harm, as procedure-related complications may occur. We hypothesized that EVT with failed recanalization does not result in worse outcomes compared to best medical management and compared clinical outcomes of LVO stroke patients who underwent EVT with failed reperfusion to those who were treated with best medical management.We included patients with failed reperfusion from the control (EVT-only) arm of the ESCAPE-NA1 trial and the EVT arm of the ESCAPE trial and patients of the ESCAPE control arm who were treated with best medical management. Failed reperfusion following EVT was defined as modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score 0-2a. Proportions of good outcome (modified Rankin scale 0-2) were compared between patients who did and did not undergo EVT, and adjusted effect size estimates for EVT on outcomes were obtained.We included 260 patients (110 failed EVT and 150 non-EVT patients). Proportions of good outcome were 38/110 (34.6%) with failed EVT vs.43/147 (29.3%) without EVT (adjusted odds ratio[aOR]: 1.48 [95%CI: 0.81-2.68]). Mortality and proportions of sICH in the failed EVT group vs. patients treated with best medical management were 26/110 (23.6%) vs. 28/147 (19.1%), aOR: 1.12 (95%CI: 0.56-2.24), and 7/110 (6.4%) vs. 4/150 (2.7%), aOR: 2.34 (95%CI: 0.00-22.97).Clinical outcomes of EVT patients with failed reperfusion did not differ significantly from patients treated with best medical management.

There are few data on the prevalence and impact of isolated deep grey matter infarction in acute stroke. In this study, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of isolated deep grey matter infarcts and their impact on the outcome.Infarcts on 24-h follow-up imaging (non-contrast head CT or diffusion-weighted MRI) in the ESCAPE-NA1 trial were categorized into predominantly deep grey matter infarcts vs. infarcts involving additional territories ("other infarcts"). Total infarct volume was manually segmented. Baseline characteristics and proportions of good outcome (primary outcome, defined as modified Rankin Score [mRS] 0-2 at 90 days), excellent outcome (mRS 0-1) and mortality were compared between patients with and without predominantly deep grey matter infarcts. Multivariable logistic regression with adjustment for baseline variables and total infarct volume was used to determine a possible association of predominantly deep grey matter infarcts and clinical outcome.Predominantly deep grey matter infarcts were seen in 316/1026 patients (30.8%). Compared to other patients, their ASPECTS was higher, collateral status and reperfusion quality were better and time to treatment was shorter. Good outcome was seen in 239/316 (75.6%) with vs. 374/704 (53.1%) without predominantly deep grey matter infarcts. After adjusting for baseline variables and total infarct volume, predominantly deep grey matter infarcts were independently associated with excellent outcome (