Search

The hypothesis that prefrontal cortex plays a critical role in accurate predictions of episodic memory performance was tested using the feeling-of-knowing (FOK) paradigm. Fourteen patients with a broad spectrum of damage to the frontal cortex and matched controls read sentences and later were tested for recall memory, confidence judgments, and FOK accuracy using as cues the sentences with the final word missing. While frontal patients were impaired at recall and recognition memory, they were able to make accurate confidence judgments about their recall attempts. By contrast, as a group, the patients were markedly impaired in the accuracy of their prospective FOK judgments. Lesion analysis of frontal patients with clear FOK impairment revealed an overlapping region of damage in right medial prefrontal cortex. These findings provide functional and anatomical evidence for a dissociation between recall confidence and prospective memory monitoring and are discussed in terms of familiarity and access theories of FOK predictions.

There were three primary objectives: to examine the usefulness of the Stroop interference effect as a measure of frontal lobe function; to investigate the possibility of distinct lesion effects for word reading or color naming; and to specifically determine the brain regions necessary for the performance of the incongruent condition. Fifty-one patients with single focal brain lesions in frontal and non-frontal regions and 26 normal control subjects (CTL) were administered the word reading, color naming and incongruent conditions of the Stroop task. Only frontal lesions produced significant impairment. Patients with posterior lesions were not significantly deficient in any condition. Damage to the left dorsolateral frontal lobe resulted in increased errors and slowness in response speed for color naming. Contrary to Perret (Neuropsychology, 1974; 12: 323-330), lesions of the left frontal lobe did not result in a selective interference deficit on the Stroop incongruent condition. Rather, bilateral superior medial frontal damage was associated with increased errors and slowness in response time for the incongruent condition. This result is interpreted as failure of maintenance of consistent activation of the intended response in the incongruent Stroop condition. The results and conclusion are compatible with the prevalent theories of both the Stroop effect and the role of the superior medial frontal regions. The role of the anterior cingulate cortex on performance of the Stroop task is likely related to task and patient context.

A location-based ('select-what, respond-where') priming task was used to examine three measures of selective attention (interference (INT), negative priming (NP), and inhibition of return (IOR)) as a function of focal brain pathology and the complexity of target selection. Control subjects showed different patterns of performance for the three attentional measures as a function of complexity, suggesting some independence among INT, NP, and IOR. Brain-damaged subjects showed significant response slowing, as well as a number of lesion-specific attentional abnormalities. Right frontal (including bifrontal) damage resulted in proportionally increased interference related to task complexity. Left posterior damage increased IOR in the most complex task, while left frontal damage reversed the control pattern of IOR as a function of complexity. Right hemisphere (right posterior and right frontal damage) pathology resulted in a virtual loss of negative priming at all levels of task complexity; left and bifrontal damage resulted in diminished NP only related to increases in the complexity of selection. INT, NP, and IOR are mediated by different brain regions and their expression can be modulated by the complexity of the selection task.

We examined the hypothesis that, on verbal fluency, clustering (i.e. generating words within subcategories) is related to temporal-lobe functioning, whereas switching (i.e. shifting between subcategories) is related to frontal-lobe functioning. Tests of phonemic and semantic fluency were administered to 53 patients with focal frontal-lobe lesions (FL), 23 patients with unilateral temporal-lobe lesions (TL) and 55 matched controls. Performance by FL patients was consistent with our hypothesis: in comparison to controls, patients with left-dorsolateral or superior-medial frontal lesions switched less frequently and produced normal cluster sizes on both phonemic and semantic fluency. Performance by TL patients was not consistent across fluency tasks and provided partial support for our hypothesis. On phonemic fluency, TL patients were unimpaired on both switching and clustering. On semantic fluency, TL patients were impaired on switching in comparison to controls and left TL patients produced smaller clusters than right TL patients. The best indices for discriminating the patient groups, therefore, were phonemic-fluency switching (impaired only with frontal lesions) and semantic-fluency clustering (impaired only with temporal-lobe lesions).

Memory impairments are common after stroke, and the anatomical basis for impairments may be quite variable. To determine the range of stroke-related memory impairment, we identified all case reports and group studies through the Medline database and the Science Citation Index. There is no hypothesis about memory that is unique to stroke, but there are several important facets of memory impairment after stroke: (1) Every node of the limbic system implicated in memory may be damaged by stroke but very rarely in isolation and the combination of amnesia with the associated deficits often illuminates additional aspects of memory functions. (2) Stroke produces amnesia by damage to critical convergence white matter connections of the limbic system, and stroke is the only etiology of amnesia that can delineate the entire pathway of memory and critical convergence points. (3) Stroke also impairs memory, without causing classical amnesia, by damaging brain regions responsible for cognitive processes, some modality specific and some more generally strategic, that are essential for normal learning and recall.

The presence, and nature, of any role of the cerebellum in complex, non-motor behaviors is only beginning to be uncovered. We investigated the non-spatial temporal dynamics of attention in 11 patients with chronic focal lesions to the cerebellum using a rapid serial visual presentation task known as the attentional blink paradigm. In this task two targets are embedded in a letter stream presented at central fixation for identification and the delay between the targets is manipulated. Patients demonstrated an unequivocal disturbance in rapid visual attention as indicated by an increased magnitude of the attentional blink (i.e., more impaired at detecting target 2 when presented in close contiguity to target 1) compared to 13 healthy controls. The attentional blink effect was not significantly protracted in our patients, suggesting a time-limited deficit in resource allocation during temporally demanding stimulus processing conditions. Recovery rate from the attentional blink was the same for our patients and controls implying intact selective attention following cerebellar damage. Because of the experimental design, the results of the present study could not be accounted for by motor dysfunction or saccadic dysmetria. These data provide evidence implicating the cerebellum as a critical node in the neuroanatomical network underlying visuotemporal attention and provide further evidence for the role of the cerebellum in non-motor behaviors.

This study examined the performance of 32 normal subjects and 39 patients with focal lesions of the frontal lobes on two simple timing tasks-responding in time with a tone that regularly repeated at a rate of once every 1.5s, and then maintaining the same regular response rhythm without any external stimulus. The hypothesis was that lesions to the right prefrontal cortex would disrupt timing performance. The two main findings were (1) an abnormally high variability in the timing performance (both self-timed and tone-timed) of patients with lesions to the right lateral frontal lobe, particularly involving Brodmann area 45 and subjacent regions of the basal ganglia; (2) an increase in the variability of timing performance as the task continued in patients with lesions to the superior medial regions of the frontal lobe. These findings indicate that the right lateral frontal lobe is crucially involved in the ongoing control of timed behavior, either because of its role in generating time intervals or in monitoring the passage of these intervals. In contrast, the superior medial regions of the frontal lobe are necessary to maintain consistent timing performance over prolonged periods of time.

This study evaluated a model of attention that postulates several distinct component processes, each mediated by specific neural systems in the human frontal lobes. A series of reaction time (RT) tests (simple, choice, and prepare) examined the hypothesis that different attentional processes are related to distinct regions within the frontal lobes. These tests were given to 38 patients with frontal lesions and 38 age-matched control subjects. Lesions were localized both by general regions (superior medial, inferior medial, left and right lateral) and by individual architectonic areas. Lesions in the superior medial (SM) frontal lobes, particularly involving areas 24 and 32 on the right, were associated with slow RT in all tests and with failure to decrease RT after a warning signal. Lesions in the right lateral (RL) frontal lobe, centred in area 9/46v, prevented the decrease in RT with increasing foreperiod that was seen in normal subjects and in patients with lesions elsewhere in the frontal lobes. The ability to energize a response for rapid RT, either generally or specifically following a warning stimulus, is sensitive to lesions of the right SM. Monitoring of stimulus occurrence and response behaviour in order to enhance the speed of response to upcoming stimuli is sensitive to RL lesions.

Forty-six patients with single focal lesions (35 frontal, 11 nonfrontal) were administered the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) under three conditions of test administration. The three conditions varied in the amount of external support provided via specificity of instructions. The WCST, while a multifactorial test, is specifically sensitive to the effects of frontal lobe damage if deficits in language comprehension and visual-spatial search are controlled. There is also specificity of functioning within the frontal lobes: patients with inferior medial frontal lesions, unilateral or bilateral, were not impaired on the standard measures although they had increased loss of set when informed of the sorting categories. Verbal instructions may provide a probe to improve diagnosis and prognosis, assessment of the potential efficacy of treatment, and the time frame of plasticity of specific cognitive operations.

Two patients with severe global amnesia are described who differ in the extent to which they have acquired new semantic information. Patient SS, who has extensive medial temporal lobe damage including the hippocampus as well as surrounding cortical areas, has failed to acquire virtually any new information regarding vocabulary or famous faces that entered the public domain since the onset of his amnesia. In contrast, patient PS, who has a selective lesion of the hippocampus proper, has gained a sense of familiarity of novel vocabulary and famous people, even though her effortful retrieval of this new semantic knowledge remains impaired. These findings extend to amnesia of adult onset, the proposal of Vargha-Khadem and colleagues that in patients with selective hippocampal injury, cortical areas surrounding the hippocampus may play an important role in new semantic learning [Vargha-Khadem, F., Gadian, D.G., Watkins, K. E., Connelly, A., Van Paesschen, W. and Mishkin, M., regarding the importance of the subhippocampal cortices in the mediation of new semantic learning in children with hippocampal lesions, Science, 1997, 277, 376-380].

Alexander and Annett ( Brain and Language , in press) described new cases of atypical cerebral specialization, and suggested that these observations and others in the literature could be explained by the right shift (RS) theory. The theory generates specific predictions as to the prevalence of different patterns of cerebral dominance and their distribution among right-handers and left-handers. Predictions differ between strict and generous criteria of sinistrality, as between left writers and non-right-handers. Tests of the predictions against reports in the literature reveal good fits for most data. New studies will test the RS theory if their design permits examination of the present predictions