Search

Abstract: People can solve problems in more than one way. Two general strategies involve (A) methodical, conscious, search of problem-state transformations, and (B) sudden insight, with abrupt emergence of the solution into consciousness. This study elucidated the influence of initial resting brain-state on subjects’ subsequent strategy choices. High-density electroencephalograms (EEGs) were recorded from subjects at rest who were subsequently directed to solve a series of anagrams. Subjects were divided into two groups based on the proportion of anagram solutions derived with self-reported insight versus search. Reaction time and accuracy results were consistent with different cognitive problem-solving strategies used for solving anagrams with versus without insight. Spectral analyses yielded group differences in resting-state EEG supporting hypotheses concerning insight-related attentional diffusion and right-lateralized hemispheric asymmetry. These results reveal a relationship between resting-state brain activity and problem-solving strategy, and, more generally, a dependence of event-related neural computations on the preceding resting state. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Using a creative production task, jazz improvisation, we tested alternative hypotheses about the flow experience: (A) that it is a state of domain-specific processing optimized by experience and characterized by minimal interference from task-negative default-mode network (DMN) activity versus (B) that it recruits domain-general task-positive DMN activity supervised by the fronto-parietal control network (FPCN) to support ideation. We recorded jazz guitarists' electroencephalograms (EEGs) while they improvised to provided chord sequences. Their flow-states were measured with the Core Flow State Scale. Flow-related neural sources were reconstructed using SPM12. Over all musicians, high-flow (relative to low-flow) improvisations were associated with transient hypofrontality. High-experience musicians' high-flow improvisations showed reduced activity in posterior DMN nodes. Low-experience musicians showed no flow-related DMN or FPCN modulation. High-experience musicians also showed modality-specific left-hemisphere flow-related activity while low-experience musicians showed modality-specific right-hemisphere flow-related deactivations. These results are consistent with the idea that creative flow represents optimized domain-specific processing enabled by extensive practice paired with reduced cognitive control. • The flow state has been described as effortless attention to a task. • Few studies have examined the neural basis of flow during creative production. • We examined flow-related neural activity by recording EEGs during jazz improvisation. • High-flow versus low-flow is associated with greater left-hemisphere activity and reduced frontal and default-mode activity. • The results support the view that creative flow is a state of optimized, domain-specific processing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Anecdotal reports suggest the existence of individual differences in peoples' cognitive styles for solving problems, in particular, the tendency to rely on insight (the "aha" phenomenon) versus deliberate analytical thought. We hypothesized that such stable individual differences exist and are associated with trait-like individual differences in resting-state brain activity. We tested this idea by recording participants' resting-state electroencephalograms (RS-EEGs) on 4 occasions over approximately 7 weeks and then tasking them with solving anagrams and compound remote associates problems that are solvable by either strategy. We found that peoples' tendency to solve problems consistently by insight or by analysis spans both tasks and time. Moreover, we discovered trait-like individual differences in the balance between frontal and posterior resting-state brain activity and in temporal-lobe hemispheric asymmetries that predict, at least weeks in advance, the tendency to solve by insight versus analysis. The discovery of an insight-analytic dimension of cognitive style and its neural basis in resting state brain activity suggests new avenues for the development of neuroscience-based methods for intellectual, educational, and vocational assessment. Highlights • The tendency to use insight or analytic thinking to solve problems is trait-like. • Individuals' resting brainwave patterns predict which method they use more. • Analytic solvers exhibit greater frontal resting-state beta-band power. • Insightful solvers exhibit more left parietal beta and left-temporal theta/alpha. • A brainwave model can predict which strategy a person relies on weeks in advance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There are two general strategies for solving a problem. Insight is the sudden realization of a novel idea or problem solution accompanied by an "aha" experience. Analysis occurs in a conscious, deliberate fashion without an "aha" experience. Previous research has shown that brain activity during a preparatory period immediately before a problem is presented can predict whether the subsequently presented problem will be solved by insight or by analysis. Those prior studies used a type of brief verbal problem called compound remote associates (CRA). To determine whether prestimulus activity predicts subsequent insight versus analytic solving for other types of problems, the present study used an anagram task. We examined high-density electroencephalograms (EEGs) immediately preceding the presentation of anagrams and found that during the 2-s prestimulus interval there was greater beta-band activity recorded over right central-parietal cortex prior to analytic solving compared with insightful solving. EEG source reconstruction showed that this activity originated in left mid-cingulate cortex (MCC) and the right postcentral gyrus. In contrast to prior work, we found no evidence of a significant interaction between insight-related prestimulus brain activity and positive mood, although positive mood was associated with greater activity in anterior cingulate cortex and with a larger number of insight solutions. The present MCC results suggest that participants' anagram-solving strategies may be influenced by allostasis , that is, the estimation and marshalling of neurocognitive resources required to cope with an expected task. Specifically, when a participant adequately prepares for an upcoming problem, then MCC activity is high, enabling solution by resource-intensive analytic processing. Alternatively, when preparation is insufficient for analytic processing, then MCC activity is low and subsequent solving occurs by low-demand insight processing. The current findings and explanatory model differ from those of previous studies that used a CRA task, suggesting the possibility of complex interactions between task-type and procedure-type in determining the nature of prestimulus preparation. Future research examining such interactions may yield results that benefit educators who teach students problem-solving strategies. • People can solve problems using insight or analytic strategies. • Solving strategy selection is influenced by pre-problem brain activity. • Preparatory pre-problem brain activity varies with the type of task. • Analytic solving of anagrams follows mid-cingulate cortex preparatory activity. • Mid-cingulate activity is thought to reflect allostasis, the priming of needed resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]