1. A reappraisal of pain-paired associative stimulation suggesting motor inhibition at spinal level
- Author
-
Samar S. Ayache, Moussa A. Chalah, Alaa Mhalla, Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur, Martine Gavaret, and Veit Mylius
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Pain ,Somatosensory system ,050105 experimental psychology ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Physiology (medical) ,medicine ,Humans ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Evoked potential ,Muscle, Skeletal ,Motor Neurons ,Neuronal Plasticity ,Sensory stimulation therapy ,business.industry ,05 social sciences ,Motor Cortex ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,Evoked Potentials, Motor ,Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ,Electric Stimulation ,Spine ,Transcranial magnetic stimulation ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Nociception ,Neurology ,Female ,Silent period ,Neurology (clinical) ,Nociceptive Stimulus ,business ,Neuroscience ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Motor cortex - Abstract
Summary Objectives Paired associative stimulation (PAS) can modulate motor excitability and consists of delivering repeated pairs of peripheral sensory stimulation combined with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the contralateral motor cortex. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of a PAS protocol using a painful stimulation. Methods Ten healthy volunteers underwent pain-PAS protocol consisting of 90 pairs of nociceptive stimulus over the right hand followed by an image-guided navigated TMS of the contralateral motor cortex, delivered at 0.1 Hz over 15 minutes. Four distinct inter-stimuli intervals (ISI) were assessed: −40 ms, +10 ms, +30 ms and +50 ms with respect to the individual pain-related evoked potential (N2 latency). The impact of pain-PAS was assessed by measuring motor evoked potentials (MEPs) amplitudes before and up to 30 minutes after the pain-PAS procedure. Results For the “N2 latency −40 ms” ISI condition, a significant decrease of MEP amplitude was observed in the immediate post-pain-PAS period. For longer ISIs, no significant changes were observed. Discussion A motor inhibition effect was produced by repetitive pairs of painful peripheral stimulation and TMS pulse delivered to the motor cortex before the afferent volley reaches the somatosensory cortex. This short ISI falls into a period of time corresponding to the cutaneous silent period, suggesting that the motor inhibition effect produced by pain-PAS could occur at spinal level. The repeated interaction of the nociceptive afferent input and the descending motor corticospinal volley could lead to reduced excitability of homonymous spinal motoneurons.
- Published
- 2018