Search

In the last decades, the consumption of energy drinks has risen dramatically, especially among young people, adolescents and athletes, driven by the constant search for ergogenic effects, such as the increase in physical and cognitive performance. In parallel, mixed consumption of energy drinks and ethanol, under a binge drinking modality, under a binge drinking modality, has similarly grown among adolescents. However, little is known whether the combined consumption of these drinks, during adolescence, may have long-term effects on central function, raising the question of the risks of this habit on brain maturation. Our study was designed to evaluate, by behavioral, electrophysiological and molecular approaches, the long-term effects on hippocampal plasticity of ethanol (EtOH), energy drinks (EDs), or alcohol mixed with energy drinks (AMED) in a rat model of binge-like drinking adolescent administration. The results show that AMED binge-like administration produces adaptive hippocampal changes at the molecular level, associated with electrophysiological and behavioral alterations, which develop during the adolescence and are still detectable in adult animals. Overall, the study indicates that binge-like drinking AMED adolescent exposure represents a habit that may affect permanently hippocampal plasticity., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Neurochemical, electrophysiological and behavioral evidence indicate that the potent α 2 -adrenoceptor antagonist RS 79948 is also a dopamine (DA) D 2 receptor antagonist. Thus, results from ligand binding and adenylate cyclase activity indicate that RS 79948 binds to D 2 receptors and antagonized D 2 receptor-mediated inhibition of cAMP synthesis at nanomolar concentrations. Results from microdialysis indicated that RS 79948 shared with the selective α 2 -adrenergic antagonist atipamezole the ability to increase the co-release of DA and norepinephrine (NE) from noradrenergic terminals in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), except that RS 79948-induced DA release persisted after noradrenergic denervation, unlike atipamezole effect, indicating that RS 79948 releases DA from dopaminergic terminals as well. Similarly to the D 2 antagonist raclopride, but unlike atipamezole, RS 79948 increased extracellular DA and DOPAC in the caudate nucleus. Electrophysiological results indicate that RS 79948 shared with raclopride the ability to activate the firing of ventral tegmental area (VTA) DA neurons, while atipamezole was ineffective. Results from behavioral studies indicated that RS 79948 exerted effects mediated by independent, cooperative and contrasting inhibition of α 2 -and D 2 receptors. Thus, RS 79948, but not atipamezole, prevented D 2 -autoreceptor mediated hypomotility produced by a small dose of quinpirole. RS 79948 potentiated, more effectively than atipamezole, quinpirole-induced motor stimulation. RS 79948 antagonized, less effectively than atipamezole, raclopride-induced catalepsy. Future studies should clarify if the dual α 2 -adrenoceptor- and D 2 -receptor antagonistic action might endow RS 79948 with potential therapeutic relevance in the treatment of schizophrenia, drug dependence, depression and Parkinson's disease., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)