1. Importance of Pharmacological Evaluation in the Treatment of Poststroke Pain by Spinal Cord Stimulation
- Author
-
Toshiki Obuchi, Kazutaka Kobayashi, Hideki Oshima, Mitsuru Watanabe, Takamitsu Yamamoto, Atsuo Yoshino, Chikashi Fukaya, and Toshikazu Kano
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Visual Analog Scale ,Visual analogue scale ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Pain ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Pain Management ,Ketamine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Thiopental ,Stroke ,Neurostimulation ,Aged ,Pain Measurement ,Analgesics ,Spinal Cord Stimulation ,integumentary system ,Morphine ,business.industry ,Chronic pain ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine ,nervous system ,Neurology ,Anesthesia ,Neuropathic pain ,Mann–Whitney U test ,Regression Analysis ,Female ,Neurology (clinical) ,business ,tissues ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Objectives Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is not typically recommended for the treatment of central poststroke pain (CPSP). We examined whether the pharmacological evaluation of CPSP is useful for selecting the candidates for SCS. Materials and Methods Changes in visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain following pharmacological evaluation using morphine, thiopental, and ketamine were compared with those following SCS in 22 CPSP patients. Results Twelve of the 22 (54.5%) patients in the ketamine test and thiopental test, and 5 (22.7%) of the 22 patients in the morphine test showed a more than 40% reduction in VAS score and were judged as “sensitive.” Pain relief by SCS was estimated as excellent (≧60% VAS score reduction) in three patients, good (30–59% reduction) in nine patients, and fair (10–29% reduction) in seven patients 24 months after the start of SCS. The remaining 3 patients evaluated as having poor pain relief (
- Published
- 2015