Search

Objective: To describe our experience with consensus-based decision-making for treatment of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis by neurologists, interventional neuroradiologists, vascular surgeons, and neurosurgeons in a multidisciplinary neurovascular board and to study adherence to treatment recommendations in the context of uncertainty with respect to the best treatment option., Methods: We established a multidisciplinary neurovascular board meeting twice a week with structured documentation of consensus decisions. Over a time period of 53 months, 614 cases with ICA stenosis were discussed, with 285 (46%) symptomatic and 279 (45%) asymptomatic cases., Results: Recommendation for symptomatic ICA stenosis was revascularization in 76%, medical management alone in 8%, and further diagnostics in 16%. For asymptomatic ICA stenosis, recommendation was randomization in a clinical trial in 29%, revascularization in 27%, medical management alone in 23%, and further diagnostics in 22%. Treatment recommendations were followed in 94% of symptomatic ICA stenosis and 69% of asymptomatic ICA stenosis. Patients in whom carotid artery stenting was recommended for revascularization were younger and showed a higher rate of severe (≥70%) ICA stenosis., Conclusions: Interdisciplinary board decisions are a helpful and transparent tool to assure adherence to guideline recommendations, and to provide consensus-based individualized treatment strategies in clinical practice in the absence of unequivocal evidence., (© 2017 American Academy of Neurology.)

Objective: A prospective longitudinal cohort study in stroke patients was performed to better understand the role of γ-aminobutyric acid-dependent intracortical inhibition (ICI) for recovery after stroke., Methods: Patients with acute first-ever subcortical stroke and hand paresis were recruited, and motor function as well as ICI were measured up to 1 year after stroke. Motor recovery was defined as the change in hand motor function from the acute to the chronic stage (Δ = recovery over 1 year). Primary outcome measures for hand motor function were the recovery of grip strength (ΔGS) and finger-tapping speed (ΔFT). Using double-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation, we studied ICI in the ipsilesional primary motor cortex during the preparation of a movement with the paretic hand at different time points during recovery (first week, 7 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year after stroke)., Results: Eleven patients were enrolled (mean age 62.9 ± 3.8 years). The results of a multiple regression analysis showed a significant association of movement-related ICI in the acute stage only (first week) with motor recovery over 1 year (ΔGS: R(2) = 0.75, F = 17.6, p = 0.006; ΔFT: R(2) = 0.55, F = 7.3, p = 0.035). More disinhibition of ICI in the acute phase of stroke predicted more improvement in ΔGS (β = -0.86, p = 0.006) and ΔFT (β = -0.74, p = 0.035), independent of the initial motor deficit., Conclusions: Movement-related ICI one week after a subcortical stroke is associated with better outcome of hand motor function. Disinhibition in the ipsilesional primary motor cortex could be a mechanism of how the brain attempts to promote motor recovery after stroke.