Search

Objective:We performed propensity score (PS) models to compare the outcome of patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) submitted to 2 different surgical approaches: extended transsternal (T-3b) or thoracoscopic extended thymectomy (VATET).Methods:Patients' clinical data were retrieved from the MG database of the C. Besta Neurologic Institute Foundation. In the PS analysis, a matching ratio of 1:1 of the main clinical variables was obtained for the 2 groups of patients and treatment effect was estimated by comparing their outcome.Results:A total of 210 patients met the inclusion criteria, by having a complete set of clinical data, and were included in the PS model; a matched dataset of 122 participants (61 per group) showed an adequate balance of all the covariates. Our analysis demonstrated that 68.9% of patients who had thymectomy by the VATET technique reached the pharmacologic remission/remission status at 2 years from thymectomy compared to 34.4% of those operated on by the T-3b technique (p < 0.001), had a lower INCB-MG score (p < 0.001), and had less muscle fatigability (p = 0.004). Similar results were found considering only nonthymomatous patients with MG. Results were also confirmed by paired statistical tests.Conclusions:Our PS matching analysis showed that VATET is a reliable and effective surgical approach alternative to T-3b in patients with MG who are candidates for thymectomy.Classification of evidence:This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with MG, VATET is more effective than T-3b thymectomy.

Background: Genetic and environmental factors are thought to contribute to the etiology of the autoimmune disease myasthenia gravis (MG). Viral involvement has long been suspected, but direct evidence of involvement has not been found. We recently reported that Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)—a key activator of innate immunity—was overexpressed in the thymus of some patients with MG, suggesting that thymic infection by pathogens might be involved in MG pathogenesis. We searched for evidence of intrathymic infection in patients with MG. Methods: Twenty-seven MG thymuses (6 involuted, 7 hyperplastic, 5 thymitis, and 9 thymoma) previously tested for TLR4 expression, 18 nonpathologic control thymuses, and 10 pathologic control thymuses from patients without MG (8 thymoma and 2 hyperplastic) were analyzed for cytomegalovirus, varicella-zoster virus, herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2, eubacteria, respiratory syncytial virus, and enteroviruses using PCR techniques. Immunohistochemistry and double immunofluorescence were used to detect enterovirus capsid protein VP1 in thymic specimens and analyze TLR4 expression in VP1-positive cells. Results: Poliovirus was detected in 4 MG thymuses (14.8%; 2 thymitis and 2 thymoma). No virus was detected in any control thymus. A linear correlation between plus and minus strand poliovirus RNA levels was observed in all 4 thymuses, suggesting persistent thymic infection. VP1 protein was detected in the cytoplasm of CD68-positive macrophages scattered through thymic medulla in all PV-positive thymuses. VP1 and TLR4 colocalized in infected cells. Conclusions: Poliovirus-infected macrophages are present in thymus of some patients with myasthenia gravis, suggesting a viral contribution to the intrathymic alterations leading to the disease.

Patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) are subgrouped as acetylcholine receptor (AChR)-positive, muscle-specific kinase (MuSK)-positive, and AChR/MuSK-negative MG (or double negative [DN]) on the basis of autoantibody assay. We investigated the relationships between autoantibody specificity, main clinical features, and outcome of the disease, in particular the occurrence of complete stable remission (CSR), by means of a retrospective study on a cohort of 677 Italian patients with MG.A total of 517 (76%) patients with AChR-positive MG, 55 (8%) patients with MuSK-positive MG, and 105 (16%) patients with DN MG were included in the study. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were used to evaluate associations between baseline characteristics, antibody specificity, and CSR.Clinical stage at onset and at maximal worsening was more severe for MuSK-positive patients: bulbar impairment at maximal worsening was found in 83.6% of MuSK-positive patients compared with 58.6% of AChR-positive patients and 43.8% of DN patients (p0.001). Baseline characteristics of AChR-positive and DN patients were similar. CSR was observed in 3.6% of MuSK-positive patients compared with 22.2% of AChR-positive and 21.9% of DN patients. In the whole MG cohort, onset before age 40 (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27-3.02, p = 0.002) and ocular and generalized clinical stages at maximal worsening were associated with CSR (ocular, HR = 8.05, 95% CI 1.88-34.53, p = 0.005; generalized, HR = 3.71, 95% CI 1.16-11.90, p = 0.023; bulbar, HR = 3.16, 95% CI 1.00-10.05, p = 0.051).MuSK antibodies identify a clinically distinguishable, more severe form of MG since the disease onset, with a lower occurrence of CSR. These features should be considered by the clinician in the management of this particular form of MG.