Search

Objective: We assessed patient clinical outcomes based on occlusion location, focusing on distal occlusions to understand if occlusion location was an independent predictor of outcome, and tested the relationship between occlusion location and baseline ischemic core, a known predictor of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days., Methods: We analyzed a prospectively collected cohort of thrombolysis-eligible ischemic stroke patients from the International Stroke Perfusion Imaging Registry who underwent multimodal CT pretreatment. For the primary analysis, logistic regression was used to predict the effect of occlusion location and ischemic core on the likelihood of excellent (mRS 0-1) and favorable (mRS 0-2) 90-day outcomes., Results: This study included 945 patients. The rates of excellent and favorable outcome in patients with distal occlusion (M2, M3 segment of middle cerebral artery, anterior cerebral artery, and posterior cerebral artery) were higher than M1 occlusions (mRS 0%-1%, 55% vs 37%; mRS 0%-2%, 73% vs 50%, p < 0.001). Vessel occlusion location was not a strong predictor of outcomes compared to baseline ischemic core (area under the curve, mRS 0-1, 0.64 vs 0.83; mRS 0-2, 0.70 vs 0.86, p < 0.001). There was no interaction between occlusion location and ischemic core (interaction coefficient 1.00, p = 0.798)., Conclusions: Ischemic stroke patients with a distal occlusion have higher rate of excellent and favorable outcome than patients with an M1 occlusion. The baseline ischemic core was shown to be a more powerful predictor of functional outcome than the occlusion location, but the relationship between ischemic core and outcome does not different by occlusion locations., (© 2019 American Academy of Neurology.)

Objective: The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intensive blood pressure (BP) reduction in patients with acute-onset intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) using data from randomized controlled trials., Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines of all available randomized controlled trials that randomized patients with acute ICH to either intensive or guideline BP-reduction protocols., Results: We identified 4 eligible studies, including a total of 3,315 patients (mean age 63.4 ± 1.4 years, 64% men). Death rates were similar between patients randomized to intensive BP-lowering treatment and those receiving guideline BP-lowering treatment (odds ratio = 1.01, 95% confidence interval: 0.83-1.23; p = 0.914). Intensive BP-lowering treatment tended to be associated with lower 3-month death or dependency (modified Rankin Scale grades 3-6) compared with guideline treatment (odds ratio = 0.87, 95% confidence interval: 0.76-1.01; p = 0.062). No evidence of heterogeneity between estimates (I(2) = 0%; p = 0.723), or publication bias in the funnel plots (p = 0.993, Egger statistical test), was detected. Intensive BP reduction was also associated with a greater attenuation of absolute hematoma growth at 24 hours (standardized mean difference ± SE: -0.110 ± 0.053; p = 0.038)., Conclusions: Our findings indicate that intensive BP management in patients with acute ICH is safe. Fewer intensively treated patients had unfavorable 3-month functional outcome although this finding did not reach significance. Moreover, intensive BP reduction appears to be associated with a greater attenuation of absolute hematoma growth at 24 hours., (© 2014 American Academy of Neurology.)