1. Quantitative Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Susceptibility Artifacts Caused by Neurosurgical Biomaterials: Comparison of 0.5, 1.5, and 3.0 Tesla Magnetic Fields
- Author
-
Yasutaka Kuzu, Hideaki Nishimoto, Hiromu Konno, Takashi Inoue, Akira Ogawa, Hideki Matsuura, Kuniaki Ogasawara, and Makoto Sasaki
- Subjects
Ceramics ,Alloy ,chemistry.chemical_element ,Biocompatible Materials ,engineering.material ,Magnetics ,Humans ,Medicine ,Ceramic ,Titanium ,Artifact (error) ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Titanium alloy ,Biomaterial ,Magnetic resonance imaging ,Cobalt ,Prostheses and Implants ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,Magnetic field ,chemistry ,visual_art ,visual_art.visual_art_medium ,engineering ,Surgery ,Neurology (clinical) ,Artifacts ,business ,Biomedical engineering - Abstract
Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is an important diagnostic tool for neurosurgical diseases but susceptibility artifacts caused by biomaterial instrumentation frequently causes difficulty in visualizing postoperative changes. The susceptibility artifacts caused by neurosurgical biomaterials were compared quantitatively by 0.5, 1.5, and 3.0 Tesla MR imaging. MR imaging of uniform size and shape of pieces ceramic (zirconia), pure titanium, titanium alloy, and cobalt-based alloy was performed at 0.5, 1.5, and 3.0 Tesla. A linear region of interest was defined across the center of the biomaterial in the transverse direction, and the susceptibility artifact diameter was calculated. Susceptibility artifacts developed around all biomaterials at all magnetic field strengths. The artifact diameters caused by pure titanium, titanium alloy, and cobalt-based alloy increased in the order of 0.5, 1.5, to 3.0 Tesla magnetic fields. The artifact diameter of ceramic was not influenced by magnetic field strength, and was the smallest of all biomaterials at all magnetic field strengths. The artifacts caused by biomaterials except ceramic increase with the magnetic field strength. Ceramic instrumentation will minimize artifacts in all magnetic fields.
- Published
- 2005
- Full Text
- View/download PDF