1. Assessment of cervical range of motion in patients after axis fracture
- Author
-
Andżelina Wolan-Nieroda, Agnieszka Guzik, Mariusz Drużbicki, Andrzej Maciejczak, Adrian Kużdżał, Grzegorz Magoń, Michlina Czarnota, and Grzegorz Przysada
- Subjects
Orthodontics ,Cervical range of motion ,030222 orthopedics ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Lateral flexion ,business.industry ,Cervical spine ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Orthopedic surgery ,Odontoid Process ,medicine ,Cervical Vertebrae ,Humans ,Spinal Fractures ,Surgery ,Functional status ,In patient ,Neurology (clinical) ,Neurosurgery ,Range of Motion, Articular ,business ,Range of motion ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Background Surgical treatment of odontoid fractures with posterior C1/C2 fusion always leads to severe limitations in mobility of the cervical spine and head. Purpose To assess the mobility of the cervical spine in patients treated with various surgical methods after an axis body fracture. Material and methods A group of 61 subjects receiving surgical treatment in a group of 214 subjects treated for odontoid fractures at one ward of neurosurgery at a regional hospital. Studies also included odontoid peg and Hangman fractures. The range of motion of the head was compared to standards by the International Standard Orthopedic Measurements (ISOM) and to head mobility in a control group of 80 healthy subjects without any pathologies or complaints associated with the cervical spine. Ranges of motion were measured with the CROM goniometre with regard to flexion, extension, right and left lateral flexion and right and left rotation. The functional status was evaluated with Neck Disability Index (NDI) standard questionnaires indicated for patients with cervical spine pain. Results Except for flexion and extension, patients after odontoid fractures had a statistically significantly smaller range of motion of the cervical spine in all planes compared to the control group and ISOM standards. Conclusions Odontoid fractures lead to limitations in mobility of the cervical spine even after treatment with methods that in theory should preserve the C1/C2 mobility.
- Published
- 2016