Search

Neuroimaging studies of cognition have typically been designed to identify brain regions that are active during a cognitive process. However, identifying how brain regions interact may be equally important. In a recent study we found that the pattern of activation associated with a semantic task differed depending on how subjects made a response, suggesting that there was an interaction between the neural systems underlying response mode and semantic processing (J. M. Jennings et al., 1997, NeuroImage 5, 229-239). This result raises two important questions, which we examined here: (1) How did the regions underlying semantic performance influence one another, or interact, to produce a different pattern of activation in each case? (2) What can be learned about the neurobiology of semantic processing when different regions are identified as a function of response? We addressed these questions using structural equation modeling. This technique produced functional network models representing the effect of different regions on each other during the semantic task for each response. A common network of regions associated with semantic processing was observed and included the left inferior frontal and left superior temporal cortices, with other regions brought into that network depending on response (e.g., right middle frontal). Moreover, changes in the influences among these regions across response condition predicted the pattern of activation found previously. These results show how an arbitrary response can affect the neural pathways associated with a cognitive process, likely due to the parallel and reentrant organization of the brain, and emphasize the importance of examining functional connections when studying cognition.

Positron emission tomography was used to identify brain regions that showed general increase or decrease in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) across time that was task-independent. Twelve male subjects were scanned eight times: the first and last scans were taken while subjects performed a baseline fixation task and the middle six scans were taken while subjects performed a visuomotor activation task. To determine whether there was a consistency across different studies in the regions that showed this time-related change in rCBF two additional datasets were analyzed. There were similarities across all three studies in the regions that showed a monotonic task-independent change in activity. In all three studies there was a general bilateral decrease in rCBF of occipital and temporal areas across scans that might be related to habituation in the visual domain. Increases in rCBF were found in anterior cingulate, postcentral gyrus, and precentral gyrus across studies. It is likely that these changes reflect motor learning and motor program retrieval. This implies that, unless the experimenter controls for time-dependent changes in brain activity, the interpretation of task-related changes in rCBF may be confounded by these monotonic changes in rCBF. We present analytic strategies to identify experimental effects that are independent of nonspecific time effects, which can be used when it is not possible to control these effects through counterbalancing the experimental design. Nonspecific confounds are particularly relevant in functional MRI studies in which the number of scans acquired per study is much larger.

Determining the areas of brain activity associated with cognitive processing has typically relied on the use of a subtraction paradigm, which is based on the premise that the neural processes underlying behavior are additive. If the additivity assumption is valid then brain regions associated with a semantic processing task should be the same regardless of how participants make a response. To investigate this proposition, participants underwent six PET scans, in which they made semantic or letter word judgments, responding “yes” or “no” in three different modes: mouse-clicking, spoken response, or silent thought. Analyses showed an increase in regional cerebral blood flow associated with semantic processing in the left inferior frontal cortex, anterior cingulate, and right cerebellum for all three response conditions. However, there was a significant interaction: the greatest increase was observed in the mouse-click condition and the weakest change seen with silent thought. Moreover, other areas of the brain were uniquely activated for each response mode. The results indicate that different areas of the brain were recruited for semantic processing depending on how participants had to organize their responses. Implications for the additivity assumption and methods of analysis to be used in conjunction with the subtraction technique are discussed.