Search

Background: High-resolution manometry (HRM) categorizes esophageal motor processes into specific Chicago Classification (CC) diagnoses, but the clinical impact of these motor diagnoses on symptom burden remain unclear., Methods: Two hundred and eleven subjects (56.8±1.0 years, 66.8% F) completed symptom questionnaires (GERDQ, Mayo dysphagia questionnaire [MDQ], visceral sensitivity index, short-form 36, dominant symptom index, and global symptom severity [GSS] on a 100-mm visual analog scale) prior to HRM. Subjects were stratified according to CC v3.0 and by dominant presenting symptom; contraction wave abnormalities (CWA) were evaluated within "normal" CC. Symptom burden, impact of diagnoses, and HRQOL were compared within and between cohorts., Key Results: Major motor disorders had highest global symptom burden (P=.02), "normal" had lowest (P<.01). Dysphagia (MDQ) was highest with esophageal outflow obstruction (P=.02), but reflux symptoms (GERDQ) were similar in CC cohorts (P=ns). Absent contractility aligned best with minor motor disorders. Consequently, pathophysiologic categorization into outflow obstruction, hypermotility, and hypomotility resulted in a gradient of decreasing dysphagia and increasing reflux burden (P<.05 across groups); GSS (P=.05) was highest with hypomotility and lowest with "normal" (P=.002). Within the "normal" cohort, 33.3% had CWA; this subgroup had symptom burden similar to hypermotility. Upon stratification by symptoms, symptom burden (GSS, MDQ, HRQOL) was most profound with dysphagia., Conclusions and Inferences: Chicago Classification v3.0 diagnoses identify subjects with highest symptom burden, but pathophysiologic categorization may allow better stratification by symptom type and burden. Contraction wave abnormalities are clinically relevant and different from true normal motor function. Transit symptoms have highest yield for a motor diagnosis., (© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: It is common belief that symptoms of patients with non-obstructive dysphagia are the result of impaired bolus clearance in the esophagus, usually caused by esophageal motility disorders. We therefore investigated the relationship between transit of swallowed boluses and the symptom dysphagia., Methods: Twenty healthy volunteers and 20 patients with dysphagia underwent videofluoroscopy. Success of bolus transport was graded on a 7-point scale. Each subject swallowed five liquid and five solid barium boluses., Key Results: For liquids, patients reported dysphagia during 1 [0-3] of the five swallows, while controls reported no dysphagia (median 0 [0-0]; p = 0.003). For solids, patients reported dysphagia during 3 [2-4] of five swallows, while controls reported dysphagia in 0.5 [0-2] of five swallows (p = 0.001). When correlating dysphagia to ineffective clearance (score ≥ 3), in 3 [2-4] of five liquids, the subjects perception of clearance was related to the clearance result on fluoroscopy in patients and also 3 [1-5] were correctly perceived in controls (p = 0.6). For solids, in 4 [3-5] of five swallows, the subjects perception of clearance was related to the clearance result on fluoroscopy in patients, but only 2 [1-3] of five swallows were correctly perceived by controls, the difference being statistically significant., Conclusions & Inferences: Patients very frequently report dysphagia when bolus clearance is successful. Therefore, the major underlying problem in patients with non-obstructive dysphagia is disordered perception and increased sensitivity to physiological bolus stasis. Treatment should therefore be directed at reducing increased sensitivity rather than at improving motility., (© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)