1. Fuzzy reinforced polynomial neural networks constructed with the aid of PNN architecture and fuzzy hybrid predictor based on nonlinear function.
- Author
-
Huang, Wei, Oh, Sung-Kwun, and Pedrycz, Witold
- Subjects
- *
NONLINEAR functions , *FUZZY neural networks , *ARTIFICIAL neural networks , *POLYNOMIALS , *PARTICLE swarm optimization - Abstract
• We propose fuzzy reinforced polynomial neural networks based on PNN architecture. • We propose fuzzy reinforced polynomial neurons (FRPNs) in the design of FRPNNs. • The proposed FRPNNs is a generalization of hybrid predictors (HPs). In the field of dynamic system identification and prediction, linear models (e.g., autoregressive models), nonlinear models (namely, neural networks models), and hybrid predictors (HPs) that are a hybridization of linear and nonlinear models have been proposed in the past. However, they are not completely free from limitations: they exhibit difficulties to describe high-order nonlinear relations between input and output variables. In this study, we propose fuzzy reinforced polynomial neural networks (FRPNNs), which are polynomial neural network architecture-based on fuzzy reinforced polynomial neurons (FRPNs) to overcome this limitation. The proposed FRPNs that consist of approximation part (AP) and compensation part (CP) arise as novel HPs. Here the CP for modeling nonlinear patterns can be regarded as forming the reinforced part for the AP that aims at capturing linear patterns, while AP is the linear polynomial neuron used in the conventional polynomial neural networks. In some sense, the overall FRPNNs are essentially generalized polynomial neural network architecture with novel HPs. The parameters considered in the design of the proposed fuzzy reinforced polynomial neural networks are optimized with the aid of the particle swarm optimization (PSO). The performance of FRPNNs is discussed involving time series and system identification datasets. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed FRPNNs achieve at most the accuracy of 43.6% higher in comparison with the accuracy produced by some classical models reported in the literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF