Search

Background Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) remains a clinico-radiologic diagnosis without routine tissue acquisition. Reliable imaging distinction between DIPG and other pontine tumors with potentially more favorable prognoses and treatment considerations is essential. Methods Cases submitted to the International DIPG registry (IDIPGR) with histopathologic and/or radiologic data were analyzed. Central imaging review was performed on diagnostic brain MRIs (if available) by two neuro-radiologists. Imaging features suggestive of alternative diagnoses included nonpontine origin, Results Among 286 patients with pathology from biopsy and/or autopsy, 23 (8%) had histologic diagnoses inconsistent with DIPG, most commonly nondiffuse low-grade gliomas and embryonal tumors. Among 569 patients with centrally-reviewed diagnostic MRIs, 40 (7%) were classified as non-DIPG, alternative diagnosis suspected. The combined analysis included 151 patients with both histopathology and centrally-reviewed MRI. Of 77 patients with imaging classified as characteristic of DIPG, 76 (99%) had histopathologic diagnoses consistent with DIPG (infiltrating grade II-IV gliomas). Of 57 patients classified as likely DIPG with some unusual imaging features, 55 (96%) had histopathologic diagnoses consistent with DIPG. Of 17 patients with imaging features suggestive of an alternative diagnosis, eight (47%) had histopathologic diagnoses inconsistent with DIPG (remaining patients were excluded due to nonpontine tumor origin). Association between central neuro-imaging review impression and histopathology was significant (p < 0.001), and central neuro-imaging impression was prognostic of overall survival. Conclusions The accuracy and important role of central neuro-imaging review in confirming the diagnosis of DIPG is demonstrated.

BackgroundDiffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPG) generally occur in young school-age children, although can occur in adolescents and young adults. The purpose of this study was to describe clinical, radiological, pathologic, and molecular characteristics in patients ≥10 years of age with DIPG enrolled in the International DIPG Registry (IDIPGR).MethodsPatients ≥10 years of age at diagnosis enrolled in the IDIPGR with imaging confirmed DIPG diagnosis were included. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) categorized as long-term survivors (LTS) (≥24 months) or short-term survivors (STS) (ResultsAmong 1010 patients, 208 (21%) were ≥10 years of age at diagnosis; 152 were eligible with a median age of 12 years (range 10-26.8). Median OS was 13 (2-82) months. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS was 59.2%, 5.3%, and 3.3%, respectively. The 18/152 (11.8%) LTS were more likely to be older (P < .01) and present with longer symptom duration (P < .01). Biopsy and/or autopsy were performed in 50 (33%) patients; 77%, 61%, 33%, and 6% of patients tested had H3K27M (H3F3A or HIST1H3B), TP53, ATRX, and ACVR1 mutations/genome alterations, respectively. Two of 18 patients with IDH1 testing were IDH1-mutant and 1 was a LTS. The presence or absence of H3 alterations did not affect survival.ConclusionPatients ≥10 years old with DIPG have a median survival of 13 months. LTS present with longer symptom duration and are likely to be older at presentation compared to STS. ATRX mutation rates were higher in this population than the general DIPG population.

INTRODUCTION Ewing Sarcoma (ES) is defined by molecular markers, being t(11;22)(q24;q12) the most frequent. Intracranial ES usually shows as metastases from extracranial sites. Primary central nervous system (CNS) lesions are extremely rare. MATERIAL AND METHODS Retrospective review of clinical records from patients with primary CNS ES, assessed at 2 institutions in Argentina between 2007–2019. Translocation was evidenced in all cases through molecular testing. Clinical characteristics, imaging, histopathology, and treatment response were evaluated. Extracranial and osseous lesions were excluded. RESULTS 15 patients. Median age at beginning of symptoms: 8 yo (2–20). Most patients had intracranial hypertension syndrome (14/15). In brain MRI, 5/15 supratentorial lesions, 4/15 posterior fosa, 1/15 medullary, 2/15 supra and infratentorial, and 3/15 lesions diffuse leptomeningeal infiltration. Histopathologic findings showed diffuse pattern with small round blue cells in most cases, other patterns were also described. CD99 marked positive in all cases. Misdiagnosis with glial tumors (4/15), medulloblastoma (6/15) and infectious diseases (3/15); led to median delay to accurate diagnosis of 3 months (range 0–67). After correct diagnosis patients were treated with standard ES treatment (6 VIDE cycles plus radiotherapy) in 14/15 patients. Vincristine, irinotecan and temozolamide was used as second line treatment in all relapse cases whenever possible. EFS was 22 months (2- 65). OS at 5 years of follow-up was 46,67% (mean OS 31 mo). CONCLUSION Even though molecular assessment led to accurate diagnosis in all cases, treatment response and outcome showed two different groups of patients with long and very short survival. Adaptative therapy should be considered.

INTRODUCTION The role of diagnostic biopsy in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) remains in question. Distinguishing radiographically between DIPG and other pontine tumors with more favorable prognosis and different therapy is critically important. METHODS Cases submitted to the International DIPG registry with histopathologic data were analyzed. Central imaging review was performed by two neuro-radiologists; all cases with imaging features or histopathology suggestive of alternative diagnoses were re-reviewed. Imaging features suggestive of alternative diagnoses included non-pontine origin, RESULTS Among 297 patients with pathology from biopsy and/or autopsy available, 27 (9%) had histologic diagnoses not consistent with DIPG, commonly embryonal tumors (n=9) and pilocytic astrocytomas (n=11). 163 patients had diagnostic MRI available for central neuroimaging review. Among 81 patients classified as characteristic of DIPG, 80 (99%) had histopathology consistent with DIPG (diffuse midline glioma, H3K27M-mutant, glioblastoma, anaplastic astrocytoma, diffuse astrocytoma). Among 63 patients classified as likely DIPG, but with unusual imaging features, 59 (94%) had histopathology consistent with DIPG. 19 patients had imaging features suggestive of another diagnosis, including 13 with non-pontine tumor origin; the remaining 6 all had histopathology not consistent with DIPG. Association between central imaging review and histopathology was significant (p CONCLUSIONS The important role and accuracy of central neuroimaging review in diagnosing or excluding DIPG is demonstrated. In patients with pontine tumors for which DIPG is felt unlikely radiographically, biopsy may be considered to guide diagnosis and treatment.

PURPOSE To review data from DIPG Registry patients recorded to have received a second course of radiation therapy (rRT). METHODS The International DIPG Registry was searched for patients with DIPG who were treated with a known dose of rRT. Doses of rRT, timing from initial diagnosis and primary radiation therapy (pRT), radiographic response to rRT and survival from diagnosis (OS) were evaluated. RESULTS Sixty (11.2%) of 535 Registry patients underwent rRT; dose was provided for 44 patients. Median (range) data from those 44 revealed that rRT was given at 12 (2–65) months from initial diagnosis of DIPG and at 9.6 (1–61) months from completion of pRT at a dose of 26.7 (1.8–74) Gy. After completion of rRT, MRI showed response, progression, stable disease or was not available in 19, 8, 3 and 14 patients, respectively. Median PFS and OS were 11 and 18.1 months, respectively. 475 Registry patients did not undergo rRT; their ages, duration of symptoms, and primary treatment with or without chemotherapy were not significantly different from the rRT cohort. Median PFS and OS for the non-rRT patients were 6.9 and 10 months, respectively. rRT patients were more likely to have had radiographic evidence of tumor necrosis at diagnosis than non-rRT patients. CONCLUSIONS Administration of rRT to patients with DIPG has been inconsistent with respect to timing and dose. Toxicity, response and quality of life data are incomplete, but survival appears to be lengthened with rRT. Prospective clinical trials will elucidate benefits and risks of rRT.

INTRODUCTION: Patients ≥10 years of age with a DIPG are reported to have a higher rate of long-term survival (≥24 months). The purpose of this study was to compare clinical, radiological, pathological and molecular characteristics between patients ≥10 years old with DIPG who were long-term survivors (LTS) vs short-term survivors (STS) and assess biological differences in this age group compared to patients