Search

Re-irradiation is therapeutically considered for select rGBM patients and may induce immunogenic cell death to stimulate anti-tumor immune responses. Our phase 2 study of re-irradiation with pembrolizumab among rGBM patients evaluated the efficacy and safety of this regimen. METHODS Adult rGBM patients with KPS ≥ 70, a maximum supratentorial tumor diameter of 6 cm who were on ≤ 2mg dexamethasone/day and were ≥ 6 months from initial conventional radiation therapy were eligible. Cohort A (bevacizumab [BEV]-naïve) had ≤ 2 prior progressions while cohort B (BEV-refractory) allowed unlimited progressions but only one on prior BEV. Re-irradiation included 35 Gy over 10 fractions to residual enhancing (cohort A) as well as enhancing + non-enhancing (cohort B) disease. Pembrolizumab was administered at 200 mg every three weeks beginning within one week of re-irradiation start. BEV was administered at 15 mg/kg every three weeks for cohort B only. RESULTS Sixty patients enrolled (n = 30 per cohort) with a median age of 61 years (range 20-76), 47% were female and 53% enrolled after 2 or more progressions. Grade 3 events deemed at least possibly related to study therapy in > one patient for cohort A included headache (n = 2) and for cohort B included elevated ALT (n = 2) and hypertension (n = 5). No grade 4 events occurred in more than single patients per cohort and no grade 5 events occurred. Median PFS and PFS-6 were 4.9 months (95% CI: 3.5, 5.6) and 26.0% (95% CI: 12.3%, 43.0%) for cohort A and 4.14 months (95% CI: 3.45, 5.42) and 16.9% (95% CI: 5.4, 33.7) for cohort B. Median survival for cohorts A and B were 11.5 months (95% CI: 9.6, 14.1) and 7.6 months (95% CI 5.5, 9.3), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Re-irradiation with pembrolizumab was overall well tolerated and achieved comparable efficacy to historical salvage therapy established with lomustine.

BACKGROUND KRT232 is an orally bioavailable, selective small molecule inhibitor of MDM2 that blocks the protein-protein interaction between MDM2 and p53. We performed a surgical window of opportunity trial of KRT232 in patients with recurrent GBM. METHODS The primary endpoint was to determine the tumor tissue concentration of KRT232. Prior to surgery, patients received KRT232 at either 120mg (n = 10, minimal dose that is consistently associated with alterations in serum MIC-1) or 240mg (n = 10; recommended phase 2 dose as monotherapy) for two days prior to surgical resection. Surgery was performed 3-6 hours following the last administration of KRT232. Tissue was analyzed for KRT232 concentration by LC/MS and for correlative studies. Participants with TP53 wild-type tumors were eligible to continue KRT232 following recovery from surgery at the RP2D of 240mg QD x 7 days q3weeks. RESULTS Twenty-one patients were enrolled from July 2018 to April 2020. One patient was deemed ineligible after surgery due to non-GBM tumor. Study met the prespecified criteria of target intra-tumor drug concentration of ≥ 25nM in contrast enhancing tissue in more than 50% of the patients in the 120mg cohort (67.1 ± 42.7nM in 8/10 patients) and 240mg (328.7 ± 468.1nM in 10/10 patients) cohort. Serum MIC-1 fold-changes from baseline (FCB) approximately 24 hours after a single dose of KRT232 were higher in the 240mg cohort (9.1 ± 4.1-FCB) than the 120mg cohort (3.6 ± 2.0-FCB). CDKN1A (p21), a downstream marker of p53, was significantly upregulated in analyzed participants whose GBM was TP53 wildtype, but not in TP53 mutant GBM or control samples (GBM treated with standard of care). CONCLUSION KRT232 at both 120mg and 240mg achieves adequate tumor tissue penetration and affects downstream pathways in TP53 wildtype GBM. The study has moved to Alliance to complete a phase 1 study of radiation + KRT232 in patients with newly diagnosed MGMT unmethylated GBM.

BACKGROUND GBM genomic profiling relies on sequencing a limited tumor tissue sample, which is invasive and may underrepresent molecular heterogeneity. CSF, which can be obtained less invasively, is in intimate contact with tumor lesions and may better capture the full genomic profile of the tumor. However, datasets with contemporaneously collected CSF and tissue to support this claim have been lacking. To evaluate the performance of CSF NGS, we conducted a pilot study in patients with GBM undergoing a resection for suspected recurrence following first-line chemoradiotherapy. METHODS Paired CSF and tissue samples were sequenced using a hybrid capture-based NGS assay. Clinically meaningful variants were defined as those that are potentially targetable using off-label or clinical trial options, exhibit prognostic value, or may predict response or resistance to specific treatments. RESULTS Eighteen patients were enrolled, and 13 of 18 CSF samples (72.2%) were sequenced successfully. At least one variant was detected in all CSF samples analyzed. A median of 7 variants (range 1—67) was detected per sample across 54 genes. The median variant allele fraction was 0.6% (range 0.2—72.4%). Among 38 clinically meaningful genes, 102 variants were detected; 25 (24.5%) were detected in both tissue and CSF, while 60 (58.8%) were detectable solely in CSF. Hypermutation was detected by CSF in one patient. Of the 82 variants detected in this patient’s tumor, 15 (18.3%) were identified in both tissue and CSF, 15 (18.3%) were identified only in the tissue, and 52 (63.2%) were identified only in the CSF. CONCLUSIONS CSF NGS detects clinically meaningful variants at a substantial rate and frequently identifies mutations not detected by matched tissue NGS. These results suggest that CSF may be a suitable source material for tumor profiling, overcoming the limitations of tissue, and may also provide a more comprehensive tumor profile.

PURPOSE Differentiation of tumor progression (TP) from pseudoprogression (PsP) is a major unmet need in post-treatment glioblastoma (GBM). 18F-Fluciclovine is a synthetic amino acid PET radiotracer with higher uptake in tumor tissue vs. areas of treatment-related change. We investigated the value of 18F-Fluciclovine PET for differentiating PsP from TP independent from and in combination with multi-parametric MRI. METHODS We prospectively enrolled 30 patients with GBM with a new or enlarging contrast-enhancing lesion on MRI after chemoradiotherapy who were planned for surgical resection of the lesion. Patients underwent pre-operative 18F-Fluciclovine PET and multi-parametric MRI. Following surgery, the relative percentages of viable tumor and therapy-related changes observed in histopathology were quantified. Patients were categorized as TP if viable tumor represented ≥ 50% of the specimen, mixed TP if < 50% and > 10%, and PsP if ≤ 10%. RESULTS 18 patients had TP, 4 had mixed TP, and 8 PsP. Patients with TP/mixed TP had a significantly higher 40-50 minutes SUVmax (6.64 + 1.88 vs 4.11± 1.52, p=0.009) and an SUVmax cut-off of 4.66 provided 90% sensitivity and 83% specificity for differentiation of TP/mixed TP from PsP (AUC=0.856). A maximum cerebral blood volume (CBVmax) cut-off of 3.67 provided 90% sensitivity and 71% specificity for differentiation of TP/mixed TP from PsP (AUC=0.779). Combining a 40-50 minutes SUVmax cut-off of 4.662 and a relative CBVmax cut-off of 3.67 provided 100% sensitivity and 80% specificity for differentiating TP/mixed TP from PsP (AUC=0.95). The time activity curve patterns and time to peaks were not different between the groups. Normalization of PET parameters to normal brain parenchyma were not helpful to differentiate the groups due to variability in radiotracer uptake in normal brain between subjects. CONCLUSION 18F-Fluciclovine PET uptake can accurately differentiate PsP from TP in GBM patients, with even more accurate differentiation achieved when combined with MRI.

BACKGROUND We evaluated the combination of retifanlimab, INCAGN01876, and FSRT in patients with recurrent GBM. METHODS Phase II, single-center, 2 cohort study (A: single-arm non-surgical cohort; B, two-arm neoadjuvant/surgical cohort). Cohort A patients received pre-FSRT one-time doses of retifanlimab (500mg) and INCAGN01876 (300mg), FSRT (8 Gy x 3 fractions), and post-FSRT 28-day treatment cycles (retifanlimab, day 1; INCAGN01876, days 1, 15). Cohort B patients received pre-surgery doses of retifanlimab + INCAGN01876; subsequently, patients either went directly to resection (Sub-Arm 1) or to FSRT followed by resection (Sub-Arm 2). All patients resumed immunotherapy post-operatively. Primary endpoint: ORR in Cohort A. Data cut-off for this analysis was June 30, 2022. RESULTS Thirty-two evaluable patients: Cohort A, n=16; Cohort B, n=16 (Sub-Arm 1, n=8, Sub-Arm 2, n=8). Median follow-up time: Cohort A, 13.6 months; Cohort B, 8.8 months. Forty-four percent women, median age 64 (IQR, 55–65), 56% MGMT unmethylated. Most common grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs included cerebral edema (25%), lymphopenia (16%), and cognitive disturbance (13%). Efficacy in Cohort A: no objective responses observed, best response of stable disease achieved in 9/16 patients (56%), median PFS 3.9 months (95% CI 2.1 – 6.2 months), median OS 9.8 months (95% CI 8.3 months – not reached [NR]). Efficacy in Cohort B: median PFS NR, median OS 15.1 months (95% CI 8.5 months – NR). Median PFS and OS are longer in Cohort B Sub-Arm 2 compared to Cohort B Sub-Arm 1 (PFS, NR vs. 2.2 months, p = 0.009; OS, NR vs. 8.5 months, p=0.026). Results of tissue and blood-based immune correlative analyses will be presented. CONCLUSIONS The combination of retifanlimab, INCAGN01876, and FSRT is generally well-tolerated in patients with recurrent GBM when administered with or without surgical resection. Survival outcomes in the neoadjuvant cohort are encouraging, largely driven by patients that received neoadjuvant FSRT.

BACKGROUND We have previously demonstrated that high baseline plasma cfDNA concentration is associated with poor survival in patients with newly diagnosed GBM. The mechanism of this association remains unknown. To explore whether differences in the immune landscape between high- vs. low-cfDNA patients may play a role in their divergent clinical outcomes, we phenotyped tumors from patients with high vs. low cfDNA using mass cytometry by time of flight (CyTOF). METHODS We performed CyTOF on frozen tumor infiltrate suspension from a pilot cohort of patients with previously untreated GBM with known baseline plasma cfDNA concentration (Bagley, Clin Cancer Res 2020). CyTOF was used to simultaneously measure expression of 39 molecules related to immune cell lineage, differentiation state, and function. Differences in immune cell infiltrates between high- and low-cfDNA patients were assessed using Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS Four patients with high cfDNA (median 57, range 33-90 ng/mL) were compared to six patients with low cfDNA (median 12, range 7-16 ng/mL). Immune cell infiltrates with increased adaptive cells (high monocytes and T cells, p=0.05) were present in high-cfDNA compared to low-cfDNA patients. While > 70% of the infiltrating T cells were exhausted in both groups, the pattern of exhaustion was significantly different in high- vs. low-cfDNA patients, with less CXCR5+CD69+ and more CXCR5-CD69- (p=0.008) progenitor exhausted T cells in cfDNA-high patients. CONCLUSIONS In this GBM pilot study, we demonstrated differences in the tumor immune infiltrate in patients with high vs. low baseline plasma cfDNA concentration. Preclinical studies will be needed to determine if this explains the association between high plasma cfDNA and poor outcomes previously observed in patients. Our results may have implications for the use of cfDNA concentration as a predictive biomarker for immunotherapy, as tumors with more intermediate progenitor (CXCR5-CD69-) exhausted T cells may respond better to PD-1 checkpoint blockade.

PURPOSE Decision making about the best course of treatment for glioblastoma patients becomes challenging when a new enhancing lesion appears in the vicinity of the surgical bed on follow-up MRI (after maximal safe tumor resection and chemoradiation), raising concerns for tumor progression (TP). Literature indicates 30-50% of these new lesions describe primarily treatment-related changes (TRC). We hypothesize that quantitative analysis of specific and sensitive features extracted from multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) via machine learning (ML) techniques may yield non-invasive imaging signatures that distinguish TP from TRC and facilitate better treatment personalization. METHODS We have generated an ML model on a retrospective cohort of 58 subjects, and prospectively evaluated on an independent cohort of 58 previously unseen patients who underwent second resection for suspicious recurrence and had availability of advanced mpMRI (T1, T1-Gd, T2, T2-FLAIR, DTI, DSC). The features selected by our retrospective model, representing principal components analysis of intensity distributions, morphological, statistical, and texture descriptors, were extracted from the mpMRI of the prospective cohort. Integration of these features revealed signatures distinguishing between TP, mixed response, and TRC. Independently, a board-certified neuropathologist evaluated the resected tissue by blindly classifying it in the above three categories, based on mitotic figures, pseudopalisading necrosis, geographic necrosis, dystrophic calcification, vascular changes, and Ki67. RESULTS Tissues classified as TRC by the neuropathologist were associated with imaging phenotypes of lower angiogenesis (DSC-derived features), lower cellularity (DTI-derived features), and higher water concentration (T2, T2-FLAIR features). Our ML model characterized TP with 78% accuracy (sensitivity:86%, specificity:70%, AUC:0.80 (95%CI, 0.68-0.92)) and TRC with 81% accuracy (sensitivity:80%, specificity:81%, AUC:0.87 (95%CI, 0.72-1.00)). CONCLUSION Our proposed ML model reveals distinct non-invasive markers of TP and TRC, directly associated with histopathological changes in prospective glioblastoma patients. Reliable stratification of TP and TRC entities may help to noninvasively determine whether the course of treatment should change.

In patients with certain hematologic malignancies, the use of autologous T cells genetically modified to express chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) has led to unprecedented clinical responses. Although progress in solid tumors has been elusive, recent clinical studies have demonstrated the feasibility and safety of CAR T-cell therapy for glioblastoma. In addition, despite formidable barriers to T-cell localization and effector function in glioblastoma, signs of efficacy have been observed in select patients. In this review, we begin with a discussion of established obstacles to systemic therapy in glioblastoma and how these may be overcome by CAR T cells. We continue with a summary of previously published CAR T-cell trials in GBM, and end by outlining the key therapeutic challenges associated with the use of CAR T cells in this disease.

PURPOSE Multi-omics data integration captures tumor characteristics at multiple scales [i.e., microscopic (genomics and epigenetics), macroscopic (radiomics), clinical manifestation], provides a more comprehensive assessment of patient’s risk, and facilitates personalized therapies. In this work, we investigated the synergistic value of such multiple data sources for risk stratification and prediction of overall survival in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma tumors. METHODS Quantitative conventional and deep radiomics were extracted from pre-operative multi-parametric structural MRI (T1, T1Gd, T2, T2-FLAIR) of 501 patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. 389/501 and 112/501 patients formed our discovery and replication cohorts, respectively. Conventional radiomics were extracted from CaPTk, and deep radiomics from a pre-trained VGG-19 model. Multivariate SVM classification was performed on the discovery cohort to stratify patients in high, medium, and low-risk groups, using recursive feature elimination and 5-fold cross-validation. This model was independently tested on the replication cohort, and a radiomic-based survival prediction index (SPIradiomics) was calculated for each patient. Multi-stage integration of omics data, i.e., clinical (age, gender, extent of resection (EOR)), SPIradiomics, epigenetics (MGMT promoter methylation), and genomics (27 clinically relevant gene mutations via next-generation sequencing (NGS)), was performed using multivariate Cox proportional hazards (Cox-PH) model for stratification of the risk in the replication cohort. RESULTS Cox-PH modeling resulted in a concordance index (c-index) of 0.65 (95% CI:0.6–0.7) for clinical data, 0.67 (95% CI:0.62–0.72) for clinical and epigenetics, 0.70 (95% CI:0.65–0.75) for clinical and radiomics, 0.72 (95% CI:0.68–0.77) for clinical, epigenetics, and radiomics, and 0.75 (95% CI:0.71 – 0.78) for the multi-omics combination of all data; highlighting the added value of each layer of information in prediction of the patient’s risk. CONCLUSION Our results reinforce the synergistic value of integrated diagnostic methods for improving risk assessment of patients with glioblastoma that may pave the path towards a more personalized treatment planning.

BACKGROUND CAN-2409 is a replication-deficient adenovirus that delivers HSV thymidine kinase to cancer cells, resulting in local conversion of orally administered valacyclovir into a toxic metabolite. Previously, a phase 1b/2 clinical trial of CAN-2409 combined with standard-of-care (SOC) demonstrated safety and improved survival in HGG patients. Addition of CAN-2409 to nivolumab has the potential to activate locally recruited lymphocytes and teach them to recognize tumor neoantigens, changing the ‘cold’ immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, and synergizing with the activity mediated by immune checkpoint inhibitors. This notion is supported by preclinical experiments showing that the combination of CAN-2409 with anti-PD1 therapy was more effective than either treatment alone. METHODS This ongoing phase 1 clinical trial evaluates safety and initial efficacy of CAN-2409 combined with nivolumab and SOC in newly diagnosed HGG. CAN-2409 is injected during neurosurgery into the tumor bed, followed by 14-days of valacyclovir. Radiation starts within 8 (+/-4) days of surgery. Temozolomide is administered to MGMT-methylation positive patients only. Nivolumab is given every 2 weeks, up to 52-weeks. Deep immune profiling studies are ongoing and initial results will be available shortly. RESULTS From February 2019 to March 2021, 41 patients were enrolled and 35 were evaluable for safety from the combination of CAN-2409, nivolumab and SOC: 24 male and 11 female; 34 glioblastoma, 1 diffuse astrocytoma; 33 IDH-wildtype, 2 IDH-mutant; 15 MGMT-methylated, 20 unmethylated. Median age was 62-years (range 28-79), median KPS 90 (range 80-100). With 13 months median follow-up, no unexpected serious adverse events were observed, and 23 patients are still alive. The most frequent possibly related adverse events (>10%) were nausea, fatigue, fever, headache, and increased ALT. CONCLUSIONS The combination of CAN-2409 + nivolumab + SOC was well tolerated. Clinical follow-up and extensive biomarker analyses will provide a better understanding of the therapeutic potential of this approach.

BACKGROUND Preclinical studies have demonstrated that IDH1-mutant (IDHmt) gliomas harbor a BRCAness phenotype with a defect in homologous recombination that confers PARP inhibitor sensitivity. Pamiparib (BeiGene BGB-290) is an effective PARP-trapping PARP inhibitor with demonstrated favorable brain penetration in animal models. METHODS ABTC 1801 is a study examining the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of the combination of pamiparib with low dose metronomic temozolomide in recurrent IDHmt gliomas. The Phase I component utilized a 3 + 3 design with a target DLT rate ≤ 33%. Pamiparib dose was 60 mg BID and temozolomide dose 20 mg daily, with dose de-escalation levels for anticipated hematological toxicity. RESULTS Seven patients were enrolled on the Phase I portion at dose level 1; one patient was replaced for inadequate dosing secondary to non-compliance. All patients had prior radiotherapy and temozolomide; 4/7 had received multiple lines of alkylator therapy including nitrosoureas. Median age was 45, KPS 90, and number of prior relapses 3. Four patients had anaplastic astrocytoma, 2 anaplastic oligodendroglioma, and 1 glioblastoma. One of 6 patients (16.7%) experienced DLT during the first cycle (grade 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia). Two additional patients had grade 2 neutropenia. Two patients remain on study treatment at 12+ and 10+ months, while a third progressed at 10.1 months (PFS-6 43%). Tumor tissue was collected from two patients in the surgical arm. In enhancing and non-enhancing tumors, the mean unbound pamiparib concentrations were 198 and 160 nmol/L (or nmol/kg), respectively, which were > 20-fold the in vitro IC50 for PARP inhibition; mean unbound tumor-to-plasma ratios were 0.65 and 0.38. CONCLUSIONS Phase I results support pamiparib 60 mg BID with temozolomide 20 mg daily as the dosages for the Phase II study. Preliminary Phase 0 data suggest that pamiparib likely achieves sufficient pharmacologically active concentrations in both enhancing and non-enhancing brain tumors.

BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are not uniformly effective in glioblastoma treatment. Immunogenomic determinants may identify patients who are most likely to benefit from these therapies. Therefore, we compared the immunogenomic phenotype of a responder to combination anti-LAG-3 and anti-PD-1 therapy to non-responders. METHODS We performed T cell receptor (TCR) sequencing and gene expression analysis on pre-treatment, post-chemoradiation, and post-immunotherapy tumor specimens of glioblastoma patients treated with anti-LAG3 in combination with anti-PD-1 after first recurrence (NCT02658981, ongoing). We evaluated T cell clonotypes and immunophenotype of serially collected peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) during treatment using multi-parametric flow cytometry. RESULTS To date, six patients have been enrolled in the initial anti-LAG-3 and anti-PD-1 cohort. One patient demonstrated complete response, one had stable disease, and four had progressive disease by radiographic evaluation. The responder demonstrated substantially higher TCR clonality in the resected tumor at initial diagnosis compared to non-responders (mean 0.028 vs. 0.005). Shared tumor infiltrating clonotypes with pre-immunotherapy PBMCs exhibited an increase in frequency from initial resection (6.8%) to resection at recurrence (20%). The responder’s tumor at initial resection exhibited increased gene signatures of PD1low CD8+ T cells, chemokine signaling, and interferon gamma pathways. On PBMC phenotypic analysis, the responder demonstrated significantly higher percentages of CD137+ CD8+T cells (median 8.38% vs 3.24%, p=0.02) and lower percentages of Foxp3+CD137+ CD4+T cells compared to non-responders (median 18.5% vs. 38.5%, p=0.006). Interestingly, dynamic analysis of PBMCs showed that the responder demonstrated a lower percentage of PD1+ CD8+ T cells pre-immunotherapy (median 2.5% vs.12.4%, p=0.002), with persistent decrease over the course of treatment while non-responders showed no consistent pattern. CONCLUSION Our preliminary results demonstrate significant differences in tumor and peripheral blood immunogenomic characteristics between responder and non-responders to anti-LAG3 and anti-PD-1 therapy. These immunogenomic characteristics may help stratify patients’ response to combination ICIs.

BACKGROUND Liquid biopsy has been not been widely utilized in patients with glioblastoma (GBM) compared to other solid tumors. However, the clinical utility of plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in GBM has not been assessed prospectively or at the time of initial diagnosis. METHODS We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients with newly diagnosed GBM. Whole blood was collected in Streck® tubes at baseline prior to initial surgical resection and longitudinally during the course of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Plasma cfDNA concentration (ng/mL) was quantified by qPCR for a 115 bp amplicon of the human ALU repeat element, correlated with radiographic tumor burden by volumetry at multiple time points using Spearman rank correlation, and assessed for its impact on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by Cox regression. RESULTS Prior to initial resection, GBM patients (N=42) had higher plasma cfDNA concentration compared to age-matched healthy controls (N=42) (mean 13.43 vs. 6.70 ng/mL, p< 0.001). Plasma cfDNA concentration was correlated with radiographic tumor burden on subjects’ first post-radiation MRI scan (r=0.77, p=0.003) and tended to rise prior to or concurrently with radiographic tumor progression. Pre-operative plasma cfDNA concentration above the mean (>13.4 ng/mL) was associated with inferior PFS (median 4.9 vs. 9.5 months, p=0.038) and OS (median 8.9 vs. 14.8 months, p=0.078). The impact on PFS persisted after adjusting for age, extent of resection, performance status, MGMT promoter methylation, and IDH1/2 mutational status (HR 2.48, 95% CI 1.1–6.1, p=0.046). CONCLUSIONS Plasma cfDNA may be an effective prognostic tool and noninvasive surrogate of tumor burden in newly diagnosed GBM. Tumor tissue samples from our cohort have been subjected to targeted next generation sequencing (NGS), and baseline plasma samples have been sent to Guardant Health for NGS. Plasma NGS results and concordance with matched tissue NGS will be included at time of presentation.

BACKGROUND Oligodendroglioma is a rare primary brain tumor characterized by mutation in the IDH1/IDH2 genes and codeletion of chromosomes 1p and 19q. Although median overall survival extends beyond 10 years for patients with oligodendroglioma who receive adjuvant radiation and alkylating chemotherapy, the disease uniformly relapses and has no other effective treatments. The CIC gene, which encodes a high-mobility group box transcriptional repressor, is mutated in about 70% of oligodendrogliomas and is associated with worse prognosis and overexpression of cyclin D1 (CCND1). Cyclin D1 assembles with the cyclin-dependent kinases CDK4 and CDK6 to cause phosphorylation of Rb protein and subsequent cell cycle progression from the G1 to S phase. Therapeutic inhibition of CDK4/6 activity, which leads to Rb dephosphorylation and cell cycle arrest, has revolutionized the care of breast cancer. The current phase 2 study will investigate the efficacy and safety of abemaciclib, a selective and potent small molecule inhibitor of CDK4 and CDK6 with significant brain-brain barrier penetration, in patients with 1p/19q codeleted oligodendroglioma that has recurred after standard radiation and alkylating chemotherapy. METHODS This protocol (NCT03969706) has a single-arm, open-label, single-stage phase 2 design. Subjects will be treated with abemaciclib 200mg tablet twice daily on 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Tumor response will be assessed according to modified Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (mRANO) criteria. The primary objective of the study is to determine the efficacy of abemaciclib for recurrent oligodendroglioma. The primary endpoint is the progression-free survival status of the subject at 6 months after enrollment (PFS-6). The alternative hypothesis is that the proportion of subjects without an event at 6 months will be ³85%. We will test this hypothesis against a null hypothesis of PFS-6 = 50%. With enrollment of 10 planned subjects, the power to detect this difference is 82% (one-sided alpha = 0.05).

AZD1775 is an oral small molecular inhibitor of the G2/M checkpoint regulator Wee1. The Adult Brain Tumor Consortium 1202 trial (NCT01849146) is a phase I, open label, multicenter dose-finding study of AZD1775 in combination with standard RT and TMZ followed by an IDD study for patients undergoing surgery for recurrent GBM. Dose of AZD1775 was increased in a 3 + 3 design M-F during concurrent RT/TMZ and x 5d/28d cycle with adjuvant TMZ in separate cohorts. A combination cohort with both concurrent and adjuvant AZD1775 at MTD and analysis of PK/PD and IDD at MTD in patients undergoing surgery for recurrent GBM followed. MTD was 200 mg for concurrent with 2/6 patients experiencing DLTs (grade 4 neutropenia, grade 3 ALT elevation). MTD for the adjuvant cohort was 425 mg with 1/6 patients experiencing DLT (grade 4 decrease in ANC). 6/12 patients experienced DLTs when cohorts were combined, however, five during the concurrent phase. Three patients had grade ≥3 ALT/AST elevation, one had grade 3 afib, and one had grade 4 neutropenia/thrombocytopenia, grade 3 dehydration/fatigue/muscle weakness. A sixth patient had grade 4 neutropenia in the first adjuvant cycle. Following amendment, an additional 6 patients were enrolled with 150 mg (concurrent) and 425 mg (adjuvant) combination and are in the observation period with one DLT currently. Drug concentration in contrast enhancing and non-enhancing brain tumor was 4–8 x and 0.5–2.6 x greater than plasma, respectively for patients on IDD portion. CONCLUSIONS: AZD1775 in combination with RT/TMZ at 200 mg qd M-F with concurrent RT/TMZ and 425 mg qd x 5d/28d cycle in combination with adjuvant TMZ had unacceptable DLT rate in the concurrent phase. A cohort with 150 mg concurrent/425 mg adjuvant has competed accrual with acceptable rates of toxicity currently in observation. AZD1775 has good penetration to non-enhancing and enhancing tumor areas.

BACKGROUND: Distinguishing between radiographic pseudoprogression and true tumor progression is challenging in patients with GBM. Recent data suggests that plasma cfDNA concentration may serve as a viable surrogate for tumor burden in other malignancies. We performed a pilot study to determine the feasibility of detecting cfDNA in patients with newly diagnosed GBM and explored its correlation with radiographic tumor burden and other relevant clinical variables. METHODS: We collected blood in Streck cfDNA tubes from patients with radiographically suspected high-grade glioma prior to planned initial surgical resection. Plasma was isolated using a 3-step centrifugation protocol. cfDNA was extracted from using a QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit. cfDNA concentration (ng DNA/mL) was determined by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) for the ALU repeat element. Tumor burden was defined as the sum of products of diameters (SPD) of target enhancing lesions plus the SPD of the T2 FLAIR signal abnormality on preoperative MRI. RESULTS: 22 preoperative patients were enrolled and diagnosed histopathologically with GBM. The median cfDNA concentration was 10.9 ng/mL (IQR 7.2–23.6, range 0.48–37.6). There was a significant correlation between radiographic tumor burden and cfDNA concentration (Spearmans rho = 0.46, p = 0.03). In a multiple linear regression model, cfDNA concentration remained significantly associated with radiographic tumor burden (beta coefficient 1.87, p=0.03) after adjusting for age, sex, tumor Ki-67 proliferation rate, weight, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). GFR was also independently (negatively) associated with cfDNA concentration. CONCLUSIONS: In this small pilot study, we demonstrated that plasma cfDNA is easily detected and quantified in patients with newly diagnosed GBM prior to initial surgical resection. In addition, plasma cfDNA concentration was independently associated with radiographic tumor burden. A prospective, longitudinal study monitoring cfDNA dynamics during standard treatment for GBM, including gold standard tissue correlates for tumor progression vs. pseudoprogression, is ongoing at our institution.

Background Mibefradil (MIB), previously approved for treatment of hypertension, is a selective T-type calcium channel blocker with preclinical activity in high-grade gliomas (HGGs). To exploit its presumed mechanism of impacting cell cycle activity (G1 arrest), we designed a phase I study to determine safety and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of MIB when given sequentially with temozolomide (TMZ) in recurrent (r)HGG. Methods Adult patients with rHGG ≥3 months from TMZ for initial therapy received MIB in 4 daily doses (q.i.d.) for 7 days followed by standard TMZ at 150-200 mg/m2 for 5 days per 28-day cycle. MIB dose escalation followed a modified 3 + 3 design, with an extension cohort of 10 patients at MTD who underwent 3'-deoxy-3'-18F-fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) PET imaging, to image proliferation before and after 7 days of MIB. Results Twenty-seven patients were enrolled (20 World Health Organization grade IV, 7 grade III; median age 50 y; median KPS 90). The MTD of MIB was 87.5 mg p.o. q.i.d. Dose-limiting toxicities were elevation of alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase (grade 3) and sinus bradycardia. The steady-state maximum plasma concentration of MIB at the MTD was 1693 ± 287 ng/mL (mean ± SD). 18F-FLT PET imaging showed a significant decline in standardized uptake value (SUV) signal in 2 of 10 patients after 7 days of treatment with MIB. Conclusions MIB followed by TMZ was well tolerated in rHGG patients at the MTD. The lack of toxicity and presence of some responses in this selected patient population suggest that this regimen warrants further investigation.

BACKGROUND: Hypoxia inducible factor 2-alpha (HIF2a) is a stress response transcription factor that mediates the cellular response to hypoxia. HIF2a is an underexplored target in glioma. PT2385 is a first-in-class oral HIF2a inhibitor with favorable blood-brain barrier penetrating properties and in vivo single-agent activity against glioblastoma (GBM). METHODS: A single-arm open-label phase II study of adults with bevacizumab-naïve first recurrence of GBM following chemoradiation with measurable disease was conducted within the Adult Brain Tumor Consortium. PT2385 was administered at the recommended phase II dose (800 mg b.i.d.). The primary study outcome is objective radiographic response (CR+PR). Secondary objectives are safety, overall survival, and progression-free survival. Patients at selected study sites underwent pH-weighted amine-CEST MRI imaging to quantify tumor acidity at baseline and explore associations with drug response. Results of planned interim analysis are presented. RESULTS: 24 patients were enrolled; mean age 61 ± 11 years, 63% male, 92% white, median KPS 80. MGMT promoter was methylated in 46%, unmethylated in 50%, and indeterminate in 1 patient. Prior surgery included biopsy (8%), subtotal (38%) and gross total resection (54%). To date, 21 patients have progressed at a median of 7.7 weeks (95%CI 4.66–12.3 weeks). No objective radiographic responses have been observed. Three patients continue on treatment at a median of 19 weeks (95%CI 12–19.1). The drug was well tolerated with expected side effect profile. Common Grade 1–2 drug-related adverse events were anemia, dyspnea, and thrombocytopenia. Grade 3–4 drug-related adverse events included hypoxia (n=2, 8%), anemia (n=1, 4%), and hypophosphatemia (n=1, 4%). At baseline, pH-weighted MRI showed high levels of acidity and intratumoral heterogeneity. PK and PD data are forthcoming. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this planned interim analysis suggest that single-agent PT2385 has acceptable safety but minimal activity in glioblastoma patients after first recurrence. Ongoing analysis will explore patterns of progression and correlate these with tumor acidity measurements.

BACKGROUND: Young adults with IDH-WT GBM represent a rare, understudied population compared to pediatric, IDH-mutant, or typical (elderly) GBM. We aimed to explore clinically detected genomic alterations in this population and their prognostic impact. METHODS: We identified patients ages 21 45 with newly diagnosed, previously untreated IDH-WT GBM whose tumors underwent NGS at our institution. Patients with hereditary cancer syndromes were excluded. The NGS panel detects pathogenic variants by targeted exome sequencing of 47 (2014–2016) or 153 (2016-present) genes. Clinical characteristics and overall survival (OS) were collected. These data were also collected from a contemporaneous cohort of older (>=65) patients with newly diagnosed, IDH-WT GBM. RESULTS: 28 young and 30 older patients were included. In young patients, 12 (43%) had an EGFR alteration [2 (7%) EGFR mutation, 7 (25%) EGFR amplification (EGFRamp), and 3 (13%) both EGFRamp and EGFRvIII]. Other mutations detected in 2 young patients were TP53 in 7 (25%), BRAF (V600E) in 3 (11%), RB1 in 3 (11%), PTEN in 2 (7%), SETD2 in 2 (7%), and DNMT3A in 2 (7%). Differences detected in older vs. younger patients were more frequent PTEN mutations (27% vs. 7%, p=0.049) and MGMT methylation (50% vs. 25%, p =0.06). In young patients, median OS was 19.5 months (95% CI 15.9–24.4), and EGFRamp was associated with inferior median OS (16.3 vs. 23.5 months, p=0.047). There was no difference in OS by EGFRamp in older patients. CONCLUSIONS: EGFRamp was associated with inferior OS in this contemporary cohort of young adults with IDH-WT GBM, whereas no association was detected in older patients. This suggests a potential role for targeting EGFR specifically in this population. In addition, consistent with prior studies, we found that MGMT methylation is less common in young patients with IDH-WT GBM, highlighting the need for alternatives to temozolomide.

BACKGROUND: Others and we have shown additional checkpoint molecules are expressed in GBM and preclinical studies have shown that combining anti-Lag-3 and anti-CD137 with anti-PD-1 can induce effective antitumor immune responses. METHODS: The Adult Brain Tumor Consortium (ABTC) 1501 trial is a phase I, open label, multicenter, multi-arm dose-finding/safety study of anti-LAG-3 (BMS-986016) or anti-CD137 (BMS-663513) alone and in combination with anti-PD-1 in patients with first time recurrent GBM. The primary objective was to define MTD for the mono and combination treatments with a secondary objective of OS. Using a sequential allocation, we started with doses of 80mg for anti-LAG-3 and 8mg flat for anti-CD137. Anti-PD-1 was given at a flat dose of 240 mg in the combination treatment arms. Using a 3 + 3 design our target DLT rate was < 33%. RESULTS: To date 30 patients were enrolled into the trial with median age at 56, median KPS of 90. Median treatment cycle was 3 and 43% tumors were MGMT methylated. Recruitment of the monotherapy Anti-LAG-3 and anti-CD137 arms were completed. We observed no DLT at the highest dose for Anti-LAG-3 at 800mg and only one DLT (a grade 3 elevated serum ALT at end of cycle 2) with anti-CD137 at the top dose of anti-CD137 at 8mg flat. In addition, three out of 12 patients developed elevated ALT at end of cycle 2 that was considered possibly related to anti-CD137. Another two patients had grade 1 elevated ALTs. Six patients are currently enrolled into a combination cohort of Anti-LAG-3 at160mg +anti-PD-1with no observed DLT and the combination arm of anti-CD137 with anti-PD-1 is open to accrual. CONCLUSIONS: The safe monotherapy dose is 800mg for anti-LAG-3 and 8mg flat for anti-CD137. Both Anti-LAG-3 and anti-CD137 in combination with antiPD-1 cohorts and an intratumoral surgical anti-CD137 cohort are open for accrual.