Search

BACKGROUND Although extensive angiogenesis takes place in glial tumors, anti-angiogenic therapies have remained without the expected success. In the peripheral circulation of glioma patients increased numbers of endothelial precursor cells (EPCs) are present, potentially offering targets for anti-angiogenic therapy (Zheng et al., Ann Neurol, 2007). However, for an anti-angiogenic therapy to be successful, the therapy should specifically target glioma-related EPC subsets and secreted factors. Here we compared the EPC subsets and plasma factors in the peripheral circulation of patients with gliomas to acute myocardial infarctions (representing fysiologic regeneration). MATERIAL AND METHODS We investigated the five most important EPC subsets and 21 angiogenesis-related plasma factors in peripheral blood samples of 29 patients with glioma, 14 patients with myocardial infarction and 20 healthy people as controls, by an advanced FACS protocol (Huizer et al., PlosOne 2018) and Luminex assay. RESULTS In GBM patients all EPC subsets were elevated as compared to healthy subjects. In addition, HPC and KDR+ cell fractions were higher than in MI, while CD133+ and KDR+CD133+ cell fractions were lower. There were differences in relative EPC fractions between the groups: KDR+ cells were the largest fraction in GBM while CD133+ cells were the largest fraction in MI. An increase in glioma malignancy grade coincided with an increase in the KDR+ fraction while the CD133+ cell fraction decreased relatively. Most plasma angiogenic factors were higher in GBM than MI patients. In both MI and GBM, the ratio of CD133+ HPCs correlated significantly with elevated levels of MMP9. In the GBM patients MMP9 correlated strongly with levels of all HPCs. CONCLUSION In conclusion, the data demonstrate that EPC traffic in patients with glioma is different from that in normal tissue regeneration. Therefore, the effects of glioma extent beyond the brain, and future therapies aimed at lowering KDR+ cells and HPCs may add to effective treatment.

Background.: The majority of glioma-associated microglia/macrophages have been identified as M2-type macrophages with immune suppressive and tumor supportive action. Recently, the extracellular adenosine deaminase protein Cat Eye Syndrome Critical Region Protein 1 (CECR1) was shown to regulate macrophage maturation. In this study, we investigate the role of CECR1 in the regulation of the glioma-associated macrophage response. Methods.: Expression of CECR1 was assessed in human glioma samples. CECR1-mediated macrophage response was studied in vitro, using donor derived CD14+ monocytes and the THP-1 monocytic cell line. The response of the human glioma cell line U87 to conditioned medium of macrophages preconditioned with recombinant human CECR1 or CECR1 silencing was also assessed. Results.: CECR1 was strongly expressed in high-grade gliomas (P < .001) and correlated positively with the M2 phenotype markers in tumor-associated microglia/macrophages (TAMs) (overall, P < .05). In vitro studies confirmed the presence of a significantly higher level of CECR1 expression in M2-like macrophages exposed to U87 conditioned medium (P < .001). CECR1 knockdown or stimulation of macrophages affected differentiation toward the M2-like phenotype. Stimulation of U87 cells with conditioned medium of CECR1 knockdown or stimulated macrophages affected tumor cell proliferation and migration, coinciding with altered intracellular signaling of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK). In glioma tissue samples, CECR1 expression correlated with Ki67 and MAPK signaling protein. Conclusions.: CECR1 is a potent regulator of TAM polarization and is consistently highly expressed by M2-type TAMs, particularly in high-grade glioma. Paracrine effects induced by CECR1 in M2-like TAMs activate MAPK signaling and stimulate the proliferation and migration of glioma cells.

BACKGROUND: EGFR is frequently mutated in various types of cancer. Although all oncogenic mutations are considered activating, different tumor types have different mutation spectra. It is possible that functional differences underlie this tumor-type specific mutation spectrum. METHODS: We have determined whether specific mutations in EGFR (EGFR, EGFRvIII and EGFR-L858R) have differences in binding partners, differences in downstream pathway activation (gene expression and phosphoproteins), and have functional consequences on cellular growth and migration. RESULTS: Using biotin pulldown and subsequent mass spectrometry we were able to detect mutation specific binding partners for EGFR. Differential binding was confirmed using a proximilty ligation assay and/or Western Blot for the dedicator of cytokinesis 4 (DOCK4), UDP-glucose glycoprotein glucosyltransferase 1 (UGGT1), MYC binding protein 2 (MYCBP2) and Smoothelin (SMTN). We also demonstrate that each mutation induces the expression of a specific set of genes, and that each mutation is associated with specific phosphorylation patterns. Finally, we demonstrate using stably expressing cell lines that EGFRvIII and EGFL858R display reduced growth and migration compared to EGFR wildtype expressing cells. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that there are distinct functional differences between different EGFR mutations. The functional differences between different mutations argue for the development of mutation specific targeted therapies.