Search

Ferroptosis is a regulated cell death modality triggered by iron-dependent lipid peroxidation. Ferroptosis plays a causal role in the pathophysiology of various diseases, making it a promising therapeutic target. Unlike all other cell death modalities dependent on distinct signaling cues, ferroptosis occurs when cellular antioxidative defense mechanisms fail to suppress the oxidative destruction of cellular membranes, eventually leading to cell membrane rupture. Physiologically, only two such surveillance systems are known to efficiently prevent the lipid peroxidation chain reaction by reducing (phospho)lipid hydroperoxides to their corresponding alcohols or by reducing radicals in phospholipid bilayers, thus maintaining the integrity of lipid membranes. Mechanistically, these two systems are linked to the reducing capacity of glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) by consuming glutathione (GSH) on one hand and ferroptosis suppressor protein 1 (FSP1, formerly AIFM2) on the other. Notably, the importance of ferroptosis suppression in physiological contexts has been linked to a particular vulnerability of renal tissue. In fact, early work has shown that mice genetically lacking Gpx4 rapidly succumb to acute renal failure with pathohistological features of acute tubular necrosis. Promising research attempting to implicate ferroptosis in various renal disease entities, particularly those with proximal tubular involvement, has generated a wealth of knowledge with widespread potential for clinical translation. Here, we provide a brief overview of the involvement of ferroptosis in nephrology. Our goal is to introduce this expanding field for clinically versed nephrologists in the hope of spurring future efforts to prevent ferroptosis in the pathophysiological processes of the kidney. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The small number of organ donors forces transplant centres to consider potentially suboptimal kidneys for transplantation. Eurotransplant established an algorithm for rescue allocation (RA) of kidneys repeatedly declined or not allocated within 5 h after procurement. Data on the outcomes and benefits of RA are scarce to date. Methods We conducted a retrospective 8-year analysis of transplant outcomes of RA offers based on our in-house criteria catalogue for acceptance and decline of organs and potential recipients. Results RA donors and recipients were both older compared with standard allocation (SA). RA donors more frequently had a history of hypertension, diabetes or fulfilled expanded criteria donor key parameters. RA recipients had poorer human leucocyte antigen (HLA) matches and longer cold ischaemia times (CITs). However, waiting time was shorter and delayed graft function, primary non-function and biopsy-proven rejections were comparable to SA. Five-year graft and patient survival after RA were similar to SA. In multivariate models accounting for confounding factors, graft survival and mortality after RA and SA were comparable as well. Conclusions Facing relevant comorbidities and rapid deterioration with the risk of being removed from the waiting list, kidney transplantation after RA was identified to allow for earlier transplantation with excellent outcome. Data from this survey propose not to reject categorically organs from multimorbid donors with older age and a history of hypertension or diabetes to aim for the best possible HLA matching and to carefully calculate overall expected CIT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]