Search

Herein, we report a case of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) due to anti-HLA-DQ antibody after pregnancy and delivery in a female kidney transplant recipient. A 34-year-old female recipient was admitted at 2 years after delivery for an examination of an elevated serum creatinine (S-Cr) level. The patient had received a living kidney transplantation from her mother at 22 years of age, and her kidney graft function was almost stable. The episode biopsy showed peritubular capillaritis and transplant capillaropathy with C4d immunoreactivity in the peritubular capillaries. Additional examination revealed expression of a donor-specific antibody (DSA) against HLA-DQ5, leading to the diagnosis of chronic active ABMR. Intravenous immunoglobulin, plasma exchange, and rituximab were administered, and her S-Cr level was maintained stable. This case demonstrates a possible relationship between pregnancy/delivery and development of ABMR due to a de novo DSA in a female kidney transplant recipient.

The extent of recurrence of original kidney disease after kidney transplantation has been underestimated for several reasons. First, the duration of observation varies among studies. Second, the criteria used to schedule protocol and episode biopsies differ among institutions. And third, diagnostic modalities used for early detection of recurrent original kidney disease also vary. Thus, rates of graft loss attributable to a recurrence of original kidney disease vary among institutions and are often underestimated. However, the recurrence of original disease is often thought to be less important than chronic rejection followed by loss of a functioning allograft. It is important to note that recent data have shown that in patients with certain limited primary kidney diseases (e.g., membranous proliferative glomerulonephritis [MPGN], IgA nephritis [IgAN], focal segmental glomerulonephritis [FSGS], and membranous nephropathy [MN]), the predominant (60%) cause of graft loss is the recurrence of original kidney disease. In addition, the rate of 5-year graft survival in patients with recurrent original kidney disease averages 45%. Thus, research must address the recurrence of original kidney disease. Here we focus on this recurrence and discuss diagnoses, preventive strategies, treatments, and future research directions.

Plasma cell-rich acute rejection (PCAR) is a rare type of acute rejection in renal transplantation. Despite aggressive immunotherapy, approximately 40-60% of patients develop graft loss within 1 year after an episode of PCAR. However, the reason for this outcome remains obscure. This study retrospectively identified six patients with PCAR diagnosed between 2009 and 2015 at a single university hospital. Clinicopathological data were collected. Five of the six patients were male, and mean age at the onset of PCAR was 49.0 ±14.5 years. None of the patients showed overall poor adherence to medication. Mean time to diagnosis was 302 ±234 days post-transplantation. All patients had preceding or concurrent viral infection. Four patients developed PCAR alone and two patients developed PCAR with antibody-mediated rejection. One of the six patients showed both severe tubulointerstitial and microvascular inflammation (total of Banff tubulitis 't' + interstitial inflammation 'i' + glomerulitis 'g' + peritubular capillaritis 'ptc' scores10). This patient had progressive worsening of graft function and re-initiated dialysis at 74 months after a PCAR episode. In addition, three of the six patients had long-term recurrence of PCAR. With the recurrence of PCAR, patients with both moderate tubulointerstitial and microvascular inflammation (total of Banff 't' + 'i' + 'g' + 'ptc' scores6) had progressive worsening of graft function. In summary, the present results suggest that concurrent moderate to severe tubulointerstitial and microvascular inflammation may lead to poor outcomes of graft function after a PCAR episode.

De novo membranous nephropathy (dnMN) contributes to graft failure, but the pathophysiology of the disease remains poorly understood. We defined cases exhibiting granular Immunoglobulin G (IgG) immunofluorescence staining but lacking dense deposits on electron microscopy as being of 'dnMN stage 0'; we studied the associated clinicopathological features.We studied 4653 allograft biopsy specimens (from 1747 cases treated in the Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University) and found 42 cases of allograft membranous nephropathy, of which 28 (1.6%) were diagnosed as dnMN. Of these, five cases (0.06%) fulfilled the criteria for dnMN stage 0.All five cases were diagnosed based on biopsies indicating increased serum levels of creatinine. Proteinuria status varied from negative to 2+. The median period from transplantation to allograft biopsy was 4068 days. Four of the five cases exhibited suspicious antibody-mediated rejection together with dnMN. The glomerular capillaries of all cases were C4d-positive, as were the peritubular capillaries of three of the four ABO-compatible transplants. In terms of IgG subclass, IgG1 and IgG3 predominated in all cases, and phospholipase A2 receptor status (evaluated via immunoreactivity) was negative in all cases. We examined two cases by immunoelectron microscopy using anti-IgG and anti-C4d antibodies. We found subendothelial and intramembranous deposits expressing both IgG and C4d, corresponding to positivity in immunofluorescence analysis.We confirmed the existence of dnMN stage 0 by focusing on granular IgG immunofluorescence positivity.

Arteriolar hyalinosis (AH) is a common lesion in allograft biopsies taken following kidney transplantation. Recent studies have shown that severe AH may predict transplant outcomes and provide information about previous exposure to certain drugs, such as calcineurin inhibitors (CNI). However, the incidence of AH as a direct result of diabetic nephropathy (DN) after kidney transplantation has not been fully evaluated. This study aimed to assess the impact of primary DN on the development of AH lesions in patients who underwent kidney transplantation.Eighty-three patients who underwent living-donor kidney transplantation between April 2005 and June 2015 were enrolled in this study. A total of 33 patients had DN prior to transplantation. Allograft biopsies were scored according to the Banff classification, and the relationship between the individual histological lesions and clinical baseline data was assessed.At early biopsy (3-12 months), there were no differences in the rates of AH lesions between the DN group and the non-DN group (ah ≥ 1: 37% vs. 41.3%, P = 0.719; aah ≥ 1: 14.8% vs. 6.5%; P = 0.453). However, there were significant differences between the groups in biopsies taken more than 3 years after the transplant (ah ≥ 2: 83.3% vs. 36.8%, P = 0.013; aah ≥ 2: 66.7% vs. 21.1%, P = 0.011). Multivariable analysis showed that both the length of time after transplantation and the presence of DN were independent risk factors for ah ≥ 2 (odds ratio [OR]: 2.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.47-19.54, P = 0.011) and aah ≥ 2 (OR: 7.55, 95% CI: 1.49-38.33, P = 0.015).This is the first report showing that the presence of primary DN disease contributes to the development of severe AH late in the course after kidney allografts.

We report a case of recurrent Henoch-Schönlein purpura nephritis (HSPN) treated successfully with a tonsillectomy and steroid pulse therapy in a kidney transplant patient. A 29-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital for an episode biopsy; she had a serum creatinine (S-Cr) of 1.0 mg/dL and 1.34 g/day proteinuria 26 months after kidney transplantation. Histological examination revealed increased amounts of mesangial matrix and mesangial hypercellularity with IgA deposition. Of note, one glomerulus showed focal endocapillary proliferation and tuft necrosis. We diagnosed active recurrent HSPN. Considering both the histological findings and refractory clinical course of the native kidney, she was treated for 3 consecutive days with steroid pulse therapy and a tonsillectomy. The patient's proteinuria decreased gradually to less than 150 mg/day 6 months later. A second biopsy 6 years after kidney transplantation showed an excellent response to treatment and revealed a marked reduction in both the mesangial matrix and mesangial hypercellularity, with trace IgA deposition. We conclude that a tonsillectomy and steroid pulse therapy appeared to be useful in this patient with active recurrent HSPN. This paper is the first to report a tonsillectomy and steroid pulse therapy as a therapeutic option for active recurrent HSPN. Further studies are needed to elucidate the efficacy and mechanisms of tonsillectomy with recurrent HSPN in kidney transplant patients.

We report a rare case of nephrocalcinosis caused by hereditary renal hypouricaemia 3 months after kidney transplantation. A 41-year-old man who underwent living-related kidney transplantation from his father was admitted to our hospital for a protocol biopsy; he had a serum creatinine (S-Cr) of 1.37 mg/dL and no proteinuria. Histologically, there was no evidence of rejection or calcineurin inhibitor toxicity, although scattered nephrocalcinosis was observed in the distal tubules. Perioperatively, the patient had a serum uric acid (S-UA) of 1.9 mg/dL with a fractional excretion of uric acid (FEUA) of 29% (normal,10%) and UA clearance of 26.8 mL/min (normal, 7.3-14.7 mL/min) 3 days after kidney transplantation. The donor also had a relatively low S-UA of 2.4 mg/dL and high FEUA of 10.3%. Subsequent DNA direct sequencing followed by restriction fragment length polymorphism revealed that both the recipient's and donor's urate transporter 1 (URAT1) gene had a heterozygous nonsense mutation in exon 5 (C889T). Further, the immunoreactivity of antibodies for the C terminus of URAT1 revealed a partial deletion. De Galantha and von Kossa staining revealed that the nephrocalcinosis was due to urate crystals and calcium stones. Therefore, we diagnosed hereditary renal hypouricaemia. We directed the patient to avoid hard exercise, drink plenty of water, and alkalize the urine. The 1-year follow-up allograft biopsy showed no evidence of nephrocalcinosis in the distal tubules. This is the first report of nephrocalcinosis in the distal tubules as a diagnostic clue to hereditary renal hypouricaemia. We also review the related literature.

A 56-year-old man who had undergone cadaveric kidney transplantation 21 months earlier was admitted to our hospital for a protocol biopsy; he had a serum creatinine level of 1.2 mg/dL and no proteinuria. Histological features showed two distinct entities: (i) inflammatory cell infiltration, in the glomerular and peritubular capillaries and (ii) focal, aggressive tubulointerstitial inflammatory cell infiltration, predominantly plasma cells, with mild tubulitis (Banff 13 classification: i2, t1, g2, ptc2, v0, ci1, ct1, cg0, cv0). Immunohistological studies showed mildly positive C4d immunoreactivity in the peritubular capillaries. The patient had donor specific antibody to human-leucocyte-antigen-DR53. We diagnosed him with subclinical antibody-mediated rejection accompanied by plasma cell-rich acute rejection. Both antibody-mediated rejection due to anti- human-leucocyte-antigen -DR53 antibodies and plasma cell-rich acute rejection are known to be refractory and have a poor prognosis. Thus, we started plasma exchange with intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab for the former and 3 days of consecutive steroid pulse therapy for the latter. Three months after treatment, a follow-up allograft biopsy showed excellent responses to treatment for both histological features. This case report considers the importance of an early diagnosis and appropriate intervention for subclinical antibody-mediated rejection due to donor specific antibody to human-leucocyte-antigen-DR53 and plasma cell-rich acute rejection.

We herein report a refractory case of subclinical antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) due to anti-HLA-DQ antibody in a kidney transplant patient. A 45-year-old man was admitted for a protocol biopsy; he had a serum creatinine (S-Cr) level of 1.8 mg/dL 3 years following primary kidney transplantation. Histological examination revealed moderate to severe inflammatory cell infiltration in the peritubular capillaries. Thorough laboratory examination showed that the patient had donor-specific antibodies (DSAbs) to DR9 and DQ9. Considering both the histological and laboratory findings, we diagnosed acute antibody-mediated rejection. The patient underwent 3 days of consecutive steroid pulse therapy, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and plasma exchange. We also administered rituximab (200 mg/body). Six months after the treatment, a second allograft biopsy revealed the progression of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy and persistence of mild peritubular capillaritis. Further analysis showed that the anti-DR9 antibodies had disappeared, but that the mean fluorescence intensity value of the anti-DQ9 antibodies had increased. Therefore, we repeated the plasma exchange and IVIG. Allograft function was stable throughout the course of treatment, and the S-Cr level remained at 1.8 mg/dL. This case report demonstrates the difficulty of treating AMR due to the presence of anti-DQ DSAbs and the necessity for subsequent therapies in refractory cases.

Herein, we report a complicated case of acute T-cell-mediated rejection (ACR) accompanied by C4d-negative acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and cell debris in tubulus. A 32 year-old male was admitted for an episode biopsy with a serum creatinine (S-Cr) level of 1.83 mg/dL and pyuria (20-29 white blood cells per high power field) 49 days following kidney transplantation. Histological features included three distinct entities, mainly, in one of the three specimens: 1) focal aggressive tubulointerstitial inflammatory cell infiltration with moderate tubulitis, 2) inflammatory cell infiltration in peritubular capillaries (including neutrophils) and glomerular capillaries, and 3) cell debris consisting mainly of neutrophils in tubulus. Laboratory examination revealed evidence of non-human leukocyte antigen donor-specific antibodies. However, urinary culture and gram staining were negative. Considering both the histological and laboratory findings, the patient was diagnosed with ACR accompanied by C4d-negative AMR and suspicion of a urinary tract infection (UTI). The patient was treated for three consecutive days with steroid pulse therapy. The patient's S-Cr level decreased to ~1.5 mg/dL following treatment and did not increase thereafter. A second biopsy 133 days following kidney transplantation showed an excellent response to treatment and revealed no evidence of rejection. This case report demonstrates the difficulty in the diagnosis of, and therapy for, the complicated pathological findings of ACR, AMR and suspicion of a UTI.

We report a case of probable C4d-negative accelerated acute antibody-mediated rejection due to non-HLA antibodies. A 44 year-old male was admitted to our hospital for a kidney transplant. The donor, his wife, was an ABO minor mismatch (blood type O to A) and had Gitelman syndrome. Graft function was delayed; his serum creatinine level was 10.1 mg/dL at 3 days after transplantation. Open biopsy was performed immediately; no venous thrombosis was observed during surgery. Histology revealed moderate peritubular capillaritis and mild glomerulitis without C4d immunoreactivity. Flow cytometric crossmatching was positive, but no panel-reactive antibodies against HLA or donor-specific antibodies (DSAbs) to major histocompatibility complex class I-related chain A (MICA) were detected. Taken together, we diagnosed him with probable C4d-negative accelerated antibody-mediated rejection due to non-HLA, non-MICA antibodies, the patient was treated with steroid pulse therapy (methylprednisolone 500 mg/day for 3 days), plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin (40 g/body), and rituximab (200 mg/body) were performed. Biopsy at 58 days after transplantation, at which time S-Cr levels were 1.56 mg/dL, found no evidence of rejection. This case, presented with a review of relevant literature, demonstrates that probable C4d-negative accelerated acute AMR can result from non-HLA antibodies.

Previous studies have shown that a donor/recipient body weight mismatch affects long-term graft survival and graft function after kidney transplantation. However, the mechanisms are not fully understood.To address the mechanisms, we compared the pathological and physiological features between patients with a donor/recipient body weight mismatch and those without a mismatch 1 yr after kidney transplantation. Furthermore, we investigated the correlation with the donor/recipient body weight ratio.We examined allograft biopsy specimens from 10 recipients with stable kidney function, with body weight mismatch (donor/recipient body weight ratio [D/R BWR] 0.9), and compared them with samples from 13 patients without mismatch. We measured glomerular volume (GV) using the Weibel-Gomez method and glomerular density (GD) defined by nonsclerotic glomerular number/renal cortical area as pathological findings. The physiological parameters included estimated glomerular filtration rate and proteinuria (mg/day). These data were evaluated to identify a correlation with D/R BWR.The pathological features showed that GV and GD were identical in the two groups. However, when glomerular enlargement was defined by ΔGV (GV at the 1-yr biopsy minus GV at baseline biopsy), ΔGV was higher in mismatch cases compared with that in cases without a mismatch (10.6 ± 4.6 vs. 5.5 ± 7.1 × 10(5) μm(3) ; P = 0.049). Furthermore, D/R BWR was significantly correlated with ΔGV (P = 0.03, r = -0.436). eGFR values were physiologically identical between the two groups, but the mismatch cases had significantly higher proteinuria levels than that of the cases without a mismatch at 1 yr after kidney transplantation.A donor/recipient body weight mismatch could affect glomerular enlargement and increased proteinuria 1 yr after kidney transplantation. How these two features affect long-term graft survival and function must be addressed in the future.

Both immunological and non-immunological etiologies affect graft function after kidney transplantation, including acute rejection, calcineurin inhibitor toxicity, and a recurrence of glomerulonephritis. Glomerular enlargement or glomerular sclerosis due to glomerular hyperfiltration related to increased renal blood flow is another cause. Although the glomerular volume in baseline biopsies predicts late allograft function, the relationship between allograft function and the annual changes in glomerular volume after kidney transplantation are unclear.We investigated changes in glomerular volume after kidney transplantation and their clinicopathological relationship.We enrolled 23 patients with stable kidney function without an episode of rejection or any complication resulting in a functional decrease in the graft. We measured glomerular volume (GV) using the Weibel-Gomez method and glomerular density (GD) using 0,1 h biopsy samples as baseline controls and 1 yr biopsy samples and investigated the association between the changes in them and clinical parameters, including graft function, proteinuria, and renal hemodynamic markers, including effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) and filtration fraction (FF). The ERPF was calculated from a 99mTc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG3) renogram.The GV and ERPF increased significantly 1 yr after kidney transplantation. In contrast, proteinuria decreased significantly and Δproteinuria (1 yr - 1 month after transplantation) was correlated with ΔGV (P0.05, rs = -0.467).Glomerular enlargement 1 yr after transplantation may be related to improved proteinuria. It is possible that glomerular enlargement serves as a renal adaptation after kidney transplantation.

We report a case of plasma cell-rich rejection accompanied by acute antibody-mediated rejection in a patient with ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation. A 33-year-old man was admitted for an episode biopsy; he had a serum creatinine (S-Cr) level of 5.7 mg/dL 1 year following primary kidney transplantation. Histological features included two distinct entities: (1) a focal, aggressive tubulointerstitial inflammatory cell (predominantly plasma cells) infiltration with moderate tubulitis; and (2) inflammatory cell infiltration (including neutrophils) in peritubular capillaries. Substantial laboratory examination showed that the patient had donor-specific antibodies for DQ4 and DQ6. Considering both the histological and laboratory findings, we diagnosed him with plasma cell-rich rejection accompanied by acute antibody-mediated rejection. We started 3 days of consecutive steroid pulse therapy three times every 2 weeks for the former and plasma exchange with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) for the latter histological feature. One month after treatment, a second allograft biopsy showed excellent responses to treatment for plasma cell-rich rejection, but moderate, acute antibody-mediated rejection remained. Therefore, we added plasma exchange with IVIG again. After treatment, allograft function was stable, with an S-Cr level of 2.8 mg/dL. This case report demonstrates the difficulty of the diagnosis of, and treatment for, plasma cell-rich rejection accompanied by acute antibody-mediated rejection in a patient with ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation. We also include a review of the related literature.

We report the successful management of BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of mycophenolic acid (MPA). A 40-year-old woman was admitted for a protocol biopsy 3 months following primary kidney transplantation. Histological features were distributed in mainly two sections: the corticomedullary junction and cortical area. In the former, massive interstitial mononuclear cell infiltration and mild to moderate tubulitis with nuclear inclusion bodies were found. SV40 staining was positive in the injured tubules. These findings were compatible with BKVN. In the latter, focal interstitial inflammation and severe tubulitis without cytopathic changes were identified outside of SV40-positive areas. Based on the histological findings, we diagnosed BKVN and we also suspected of the complication with acute T-cell-mediated rejection. We started steroid pulse therapy and reduced the dosage of immunosuppressive therapy under careful monitoring, using not only a trough level of tacrolimus but also a 12-h area under the curve (AUC0-12 ) of MPA. After the treatment, the patient maintained kidney function. This case report demonstrates the usefulness of MPA AUC0-12 for more accurate adjustment of immunosuppressive therapy and the difficulty of pathological differentiation of BKVN and acute cellular rejection.

We report a case of acute vascular rejection occurring during antituberculosis therapy in a patient who had received a kidney transplant. A 29 year-old man was admitted for a protocol biopsy; he had a serum creatinine (S-Cr) level of 1.5 mg/dL 1 year after primary kidney transplantation. Histological examination yielded no evidence of rejection but a routine chest CT scan revealed typical lung tuberculosis and his serum was positive for QFT. We commenced antituberculosis therapy, including rifampicin, on June 29 2012. We paid close attention to the weekly trough tacrolimus (TAC) level but the S-Cr concentration increased to 3.7 mg/dL on October 16 2012, and he was admitted for biopsy. Histological examination revealed, first, a diffuse aggressive infiltration of tubulointerstitial inflammatory cells accompanied by severe tubulitis and mild intimal arteritis and, second, peritubular capillary infiltration by inflammatory cells (including neutrophils). Laboratory data revealed that our patient did not express donor-specific antibody and the peritubular capillaries did not exhibit C4d immunoreactivity. Upon consideration of both histological and laboratory findings, we diagnosed acute vascular rejection of Banff 2007 class ACR IIA. We commenced 3-day sessions of intravenous steroid pulse therapy twice weekly and adjusted the trough TAC level to 5-8 ng/mL by varying the TAC dose. We next performed an allograft biopsy and found no evidence of rejection (the S-Cr level was 2.7 mg/dL on April 1 2013). The present case report demonstrates the difficulties associated with management of TAC-based regimens in kidney transplant patients undergoing antituberculosis therapy. We also review the relevant literature.