Search

Rationale: The impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on vital impetus is poorly documented in patients not undergoing renal dialysis and discrepancies can be observed between patients and physicians in perception of QoL and impact of the disease., Methods: A self-questionnaire was sent to 1282 French nephrologists and a mirrored self-questionnaire was given to patients (CKD stage 3, 4 or 5) by their nephrologist. Data were collected prospectively and anonymously., Results: A total of 261 nephrologists and 172 patients participated in the survey. Sixty-six percent of patients reported a negative impact of the disease on their quality of life, which is also identified by nephrologists: important impact 22% vs 27%, mild or inconstant 44% vs 47%, mild or absent 34% vs 31% in patients and nephrologists, respectively. They had different perceptions about factors contributing to vital force; in particular, nephrologists underestimated their key role in psychological support. Indeed, the optimism and encouragements of nephrologists were considered to be a key factor of vital force for 60% of patients vs 20% of nephrologists (P<0,001). During consultations, nephrologists were primarily focused on biological abnormalities and adherence to treatment while mood or sexual disorders were rarely investigated. The main objective of treatment was to maintain a normal life for patients and to delay dialysis for nephrologists., Conclusion: Nephrologists have a relative knowledge of CKD impact on the vital impetus of patients, but there are differences of perception. It could be improved through specific trainings., (Copyright © 2017 Société francophone de néphrologie, dialyse et transplantation. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The aim of the study was to test the effectiveness of Physical Activity (PA) during haemodialysis as a protective treatment against cardiovascular (CV) diseases., Methods: Eighty volunteer patients were included in this multicentric prospective study and followed for two years: 40 patients in the Exercise group (EX), 40 patients in the Control group (Ctrl). CV risk factors: Total Cholesterol, HDL Cholesterol (HDL-c), LDL cholesterol (LDL-c), Triglycerides (TG) and Hemoglobin (Hb), and Prealbumin, Albumin, Parathormon, 25-OH Vitamin D, were checked at Month 0 (M0) and Month 24 (M24). The number of antihypertensive treatments and the Erythropoietin Stimulating Agent (ESA) required doses were collected. We noted for each group during the follow-up the number of hospitalizations for CV reasons. After two years, we compared 31 patients in EX and 35 in Ctrl., Results: We observed a significant decrease of total cholesterol EX group: 1.86±0.49g/L at M0 versus 1.64±0.38g/L at M24 (P<0.05). HDLc and but LDL-c remained stable in both groups. TG decreased significantly in EX: 1.76±0.89g/L vs 1.44±0.69g/L (P<0.05). The number of antihypertensive drugs per patient decreased significantly (P<0.05) in the EX group between M0 and M24 (1.61±1.28 at M0 and 0.74±0.85 at M24). The EX patients were three times less frequently hospitalized for cardiovascular reasons. There were five hospital stays versus 14 for the Ctrl group., Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that an intradialytic aerobic cycling training program promotes beneficial effects on cardiovascular protection. Physical activity reduced the number of CV events in our population during two years follow-up., (Copyright © 2017 Société francophone de néphrologie, dialyse et transplantation. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)