Search

The histamine H2 receptor (H2R) is a Gs protein-coupled receptor. Its activation leads to increases in the second messenger adenosine-3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP). Presently, several systems are established to characterize the pharmacological profile of the H2R, mostly requiring radioactive material, animal models, or human blood cells. This prompted us to establish a flow cytometric analysis with a fluorescently labeled formyl peptide receptor (FPR) ligand in order to investigate the H2R functionally and pharmacologically. First, we stimulated U937 promonocytes, which mature in a cAMP-dependent fashion upon H2R activation, with histamine (HA) or selective H2R agonists and measured increases in cAMP concentrations by mass spectrometry. Next, indicative for the maturation of U937 promonocytes, we assessed the FPR expression upon incubation with HA or H2R agonists. FPR expression was measured either indirectly by formyl peptide-induced changes in intracellular calcium concentrations ([Ca(2+)]i) or directly with the fluorescein-labeled FPR ligand fNleLFNleYK-Fl. HA and H2R agonists concentration-dependently induced FPR expression, and potencies and efficacies of fMLP-induced increases in [Ca(2+)]i and FPR density correlated linearly. Accordingly, flow cytometric analysis of FPR expression constitutes a simple, inexpensive, sensitive, and reliable method to characterize the H2R pharmacologically. Furthermore, we evaluated FPR expression at the mRNA level. Generally, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction confirmed functional data. Additionally, our study supports the concept of functional selectivity of the H2R, since we observed dissociations in the efficacies of HA and H2R agonists in cAMP accumulation and FPR expression.

Histamine and opioid systems are involved in supraspinal modulation of pain. In this study, we investigated the effects of separate and combined microinjections of agonists and antagonists of histamine H1 and H2 and opioid receptors into the thalamic submedius (Sm) nucleus on the formalin-induced orofacial pain. Two guide cannulas were implanted into the right and left sides of the Sm in ketamine- and xylazine-anesthetized rats. Orofacial formalin pain was induced by subcutaneous injection of a diluted formalin solution (50 μl, 1.5%) into the vibrissa pad. Face rubbing durations were recorded at 3-min blocks for 45 min. Formalin produced a biphasic pain response (first phase: 0-3 min and second phase: 15-33 min). Separate and combined microinjections of histamine H1 and H2 receptor agonists, 2-pyridylethylamine (2-PEA) and dimaprit, respectively, and opioid receptor agonist, morphine, attenuated the second phase of pain. The analgesic effects induced by 2-PEA, dimaprit, and morphine were blocked by prior microinjections of fexofenadine (a histamine H1 receptor antagonist), famotidine (a histamine H2 receptor antagonist), and naloxone (an opioid receptor antagonist), respectively. Naloxone also prevented 2-PEA- and dimaprit-induced antinociception, and the analgesic effect induced by morphine was inhibited by fexofenadine and famotidine. These results showed the involvement of histamine H1 and H2 and opioid receptors in the Sm modulation of orofacial pain. Opioid receptor might be involved in analgesia induced by activation of histamine H1 and H2 receptors and vice versa.

Histamine H4 receptors are expressed in immune cells, but their potential role in the brain is less clear. Although H4 transcripts have been identified in human and rat brain, the presence of H4 receptors on the protein level has so far not been proven since appropriate antibodies fulfilling the strict criteria for G protein-coupled receptors are missing. Here, we searched for functional H4 receptors in human, guinea pig and mouse cortex. We studied whether H4 receptor activation is associated with increased GTPγS binding and reduced noradrenaline release. The latter two effects have been previously shown for H3 receptors, which, like the H4 receptors, are coupled to G i/o protein. G protein activation was studied using (35)S-GTPγS binding in cortical membranes. The electrically induced (3)H-noradrenaline release was determined in superfused cortical slices. The H4 agonist 4-methylhistamine failed to affect (35)S-GTPγS binding and/or noradrenaline release in human, guinea pig and mouse cortex although an H 3 receptor-mediated increase in (35)S-GTPγS binding and inhibition of noradrenaline release occurred in parallel experiments. In conclusion, functional H4 receptors increasing (35)S-GTPγS binding and/or decreasing noradrenaline release are not found in human, guinea pig and mouse cortex.

The histamine H(4) receptor subtype (H(4)R) belongs to the class 1 of G protein-coupled receptors and is involved in inflammatory and immunological processes. The aim of this study was to elucidate the importance of extracellular regions for the large species differences between human (h) and canine (c) H(4)R. Therefore, chimeric receptors were generated by replacing corresponding domains of the hH(4)R with canine N-terminus (h(cNT)H(4)R) and three canine extracellular loops, respectively (h(cE1)H(4)R, h(cE2)H(4)R and h(cE3)H(4)R). Wild type and chimeric H(4) receptors were expressed in Sf9 insect cells and subsequently characterized in [(3)H]histamine-binding experiments and in steady-state GTPase activity assays, where standard H(4)R ligands histamine, 5-methylhistamine, thioperamide, 1-[(5-chloro-1H-indol-2-yl)carbonyl]-4-methylpiperazine (JNJ7777120) and clozapine were examined. The exchange of N-terminus or first extracellular loop did not influence hH(4)R pharmacology. The effect of altered second extracellular loop (E2-loop) and third extracellular loop (E3-loop) was rather ligand specific than agonist/inverse agonist specific. At h(cE3)H(4)R, the potency of histamine and 5-methylhistamine significantly decreased. The efficacy of the inverse agonist thioperamide was strongly reduced at h(cE2)H(4)R and h(cE3)H(4)R. Surprisingly, JNJ7777120 as weak inverse agonist at hH(4)R exhibited partial agonistic activity at h(cE2)H(4)R and h(cE3)H(4)R. Molecular dynamic simulations suggest that the E2- and E3-loops are independently of each other involved in the partial/inverse agonism of JNJ7777120 and that E2- as well as E3-loop do not directly interact with JNJ7777120 in the binding pocket. In conclusion, our study indicates an involvement of the E2- and E3-loops in H(4)R activation process after binding of some but not all examined ligands.

Histamine H(1)-receptor agonists and antagonists exhibit affinity to the human histamine H(4)-receptor (hH(4)R). However, the pharmacological profiles between hH(1)R and hH(4)R exhibit similarities and differences. Since suprahistaprodifen and trifluoromethylphenylhistamine show significant affinity to hH(4)R, the aim of this study was to analyse a large number of new phenylhistamines, histaprodifens and phenoprodifens at hH(4)R to extend the pharmacological profile of these compound classes at hH(4)R. The hH(4)R-RGS19 fusion protein was co-expressed with G(αi2) and G(β1γ2) in Sf9 insect cells, and [(3)H]histamine competition binding as well as GTPase assays were performed. Based on adequate crystal structures, homology models of hH(4)R were generated. Molecular modelling studies, including molecular dynamics and prediction of Gibbs energy of ligand binding, were performed in order to explain the pharmacological data at hH(4)R on molecular level. The exchange of the phenyl moiety of phenylhistamines into the diphenylpropyl moiety of histaprodifens acts, in contrast to hH(1)R, as partial agonism-inverse agonism switch at hH(4)R. Based on our studies, some phenylhistamine derivatives with significantly higher affinity at hH(4)R than at hH(1)R were identified. The molecular dynamic simulations revealed two different conformations for the highly conserved Trp(6.48), suggested to be involved in receptor activation. Furthermore, the predicted Gibbs energy of ligand binding for six selected phenylhistamines was in very good agreement with the experimentally determined affinities. We identified phenylhistamine derivatives with higher affinity at hH(4)R than at hH(1)R. Besides, we have identified partial agonism-inverse agonism switch between phenylhistamines and histaprodifens at hH(4)R. These results are very important to understand selectivity between hH(1)R and hH(4)R and to design new potent H(1)R and/or H(4)R receptor ligands.

Stimulation of the histamine H1 receptor has been shown to enhance adenosine 3', 5'-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP) accumulation in various cell types but, to date, the mechanism by which this occurs is still unclear. In the present study, we examined the possibility that the betagamma subunits of G proteins (G betagamma) are involved in this process in cultured Chinese hamster ovary cells transfected with the human histamine H1 receptor (CHO-H1). Histamine increased intracellular cAMP levels in a concentration-dependent manner in CHO-H1 cells, and this histamine action was abolished by pyrilamine (1 microM). Inhibition of histamine H1 receptor-G(q) protein coupling by stable expression of the C-terminal peptide of G alpha(q) protein significantly attenuated the cAMP accumulation induced by histamine. By comparison, neither BAPTA/AM (50 microM), an intracellular Ca2+ chelator, nor GF 109203X (1 microM), an inhibitor of protein kinase C, influenced the cAMP response. Histamine H1 receptor-mediated cAMP accumulation was significantly inhibited by transient transfection of CHO-H1 cells with the C-terminal peptide of beta-adrenoceptor kinase I (residues 542-685), a scavenger of G betagamma. Stable expression of the C-terminal peptide of the G alpha(s) protein, but not treatment with pertussis toxin (200 ng/ml for 24 h), attenuated the histamine H1 receptor-mediated cAMP accumulation. These results suggest that stimulation of histamine H1 receptors activates adenylyl cyclase through the release of G betagamma subunits from G proteins, thereby elevating intracellular cAMP levels.

To elucidate the central roles of histamine receptors in cardiovascular regulatory system, systolic, mean, and diastolic blood pressures (BPs) and heart rate (HR) were examined in conscious H(1) receptor gene knockout (H(1)KO) mice, H(2) receptor gene knockout (H(2)KO) mice, H(1) and H(2) receptor gene double knockout (DKO) mice, and their respective control mice by the tail-cuff system. Histamine, histamine-trifluoromethyl-toluidine derivative (HTMT, an H(1) agonist), dimaprit (an H(2) agonist), and immepip (an H(3) agonist) were intrathecally administered to these KO mice and control mice. Basal BPs and HR were not different among these three KO mice and their control or wild-type mice. Intrathecal administration of histamine significantly increased BPs and decreased HR in control mice. The increases in BPs were produced by histamine in H(1)KO and H(2)KO mice and by HTMT and dimaprit in C57BL mice. The pressor responses by HTMT and dimaprit in C57BL mice were greater than those by histamine in H(1)KO and H(2)KO mice, although the same decreases in HR were induced by histamine in C57BL and H(1)KO mice and by dimaprit in C57BL mice. The selective stimulation of H(3) receptors by immepip produced a consistent decrease in BPs in control mice. These results obtained with the exogenous selective agonists of three histamine receptors suggest that the pressor responses to histamine are mediated through the stimulation of both H(1) and H(2) receptors, whereas the atropine-sensitive decrease in heart rate is mainly due to H(2) receptors which activate the vagal output to the heart.

We determined the molecular properties of the selective and potent H(1)-receptor agonist histaprodifen and its N(alpha) substituted analogues: methyl-, dimethyl-, and imidazolylethyl-histaprodifen (suprahistaprodifen). All derivatives show high affinity for (3)H-mepyramine labeled bovine aortic H(1)-receptor binding sites with the following order of potency: suprahistaprodifen > dimethylhistaprodifen > methylhistaprodifen > histaprodifen > histamine. Suprahistaprodifen and dimethylhistaprodifen were the most potent displacers of (3)H-mepyramine binding (K(i)=4.3 and 4.9 nM, respectively). Histaprodifen, methylhistaprodifen and suprahistaprodifen binding was differentially influenced by GTP, whereas dimethylhistaprodifen was not affected. All drugs, except dimethylhistaprodifen, were activators of G-proteins. Their order of potency was suprahistaprodifen > histamine > histaprodifen > methylhistaprodifen. Their effect on G-protein activation was abolished by the addition of the H(1)-receptor antagonist triprolidine (10 microM), which given alone did not activate G-proteins. Our data suggest that histaprodifens are potent but heterogeneous H(1)-receptor ligands with diverse effects on the molecular level in our model system. While the histaprodifen, methylhistaprodifen and suprahistaprodifen data are in agreement with their agonistic nature, as shown in the functional studies performed on different species (rat and guinea pig H(1)-receptor), dimethylhistaprodifen behaved as an antagonist in our study.

The histamine-induced biphasic increase of the intracellular free [Ca2+] ([Ca2+]i) was studied in bovine adrenal chromaffin cells using fura-2 microfluorimetry and the whole-cell patch-clamp technique. Both the rapid, transient Ca2+ rise and the sustained plateau component of elevated [Ca2+]i were independent of extracellular Ca2+. Incubation with the sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA) blocker thapsigargin diminished histamine-induced changes in [Ca2+]i. When Ca2+ release was either stimulated by IP3 or blocked with the competitive inhibitor heparin, histamine was unable to elicit the typical Ca2+ rise. Ryanodine, tetracaine and ruthenium red, all blockers of Ca2+ release from caffeine-sensitive stores, had only minor effects on the agonist-induced Ca2+ changes. The contribution of mitochondria in shaping the histamine-induced Ca2+ increase was studied using ruthenium red and the two proton ionophores carbonylcyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) and carbonylcyanide p-(trifluoromethoxy)phenylhydrazone (FCCP). Both mitochondrial uncouplers reversibly increased [Ca2+]i and induced an inward current leading to cell membrane depolarisation. In summary, these results indicate that Ca2+ from IP3-sensitive stores is essential for the generation of both the transient increase and secondary elevation in [Ca2+]i.

The present study investigates the mechanisms through which prejunctional histamine H3 receptors modulate intestinal cholinergic neurotransmission. The experiments were performed on longitudinal muscle-myenteric plexus preparations of guinea pig ileum, preincubated with [3H]choline, superfused with physiological salt solution containing hemicholinium-3, and subjected to electrical field stimulation. The stimulation-induced outflow of radioactivity was taken as an index of endogenous acetylcholine release. The electrically induced [3H]acetylcholine release was inhibited by histamine (EC50)=33.5 nM) or the H3 receptor agonist R-alpha-methylhistamine (EC50=41.6 nM), whereas it was not affected by pyridylethylamine (H1 agonist), impromidine (H2 agonist), pyrilamine (H1 antagonist), cimetidine (H2 antagonist), thioperamide or clobenpropit (H3 antagonists). The inhibitory effects of histamine or R-alpha-methylhistamine were antagonized by thioperamide (pKd= 8.31 and 8.53, respectively) or clobenpropit (pKd=9.44 and 9.32, respectively), but not by pyrilamine or cimetidine. The modulatory action of histamine on the evoked tritium outflow was attenuated by pertussis toxin and abolished by N-ethylmaleimide, two selective blockers of Gi/Go proteins. Tetraethylammonium or 4-aminopyridine, acting as inhibitors of voltage-dependent K+ channels, enhanced the evoked tritium outflow when tested alone, and apparently counteracted the inhibitory effect of histamine. However, the blocking actions of tetraethylammonium and 4-aminopyridine were no longer evident when their enhancing actions were compensated by appropriate reductions of Ca2+ concentration in the superfusion medium. Histamine-induced inhibition of evoked tritium output was enhanced by omega-conotoxin, a selective blocker of N-type Ca2+ channels, or low Ca2+ concentration, whereas it was not modified by nifedipine, an antagonist of L-type Ca2+ channels. In addition, the inhibitory effect of histamine was not significantly affected by forskolin (activator of adenylyl cyclase), 8-bromo-cyclic AMP (a stable analog of cyclic AMP), rolipram (a selective blocker of type IV phosphodiesterase), phorbol myristate acetate (activator of protein kinase C), H-89 (N-(2-[p-bromocinnamylamino]ethyl)-5-isoquinolinesulfonamide, inhibitor of protein kinase A), Ro-31-8220 (2-(1-[3-(amidinothio)propyl]-1H-indol-3-yl)-3-(1-methylindol-3-yl)-maleimide, inhibitor of protein kinase C), KT5823 (N-methyl-(8R*,9S*,11S*)-(-)-9-methoxy-9-methoxycarbonyl-8-methyl-2,3,9,10-tetrahydro-8,11-epoxy-1H,8H,11H-2,7b,11a-triazadibenzo [a,g]cycloocta[c,d,e]-trinden-1-one, inhibitor of protein kinase G), or lavendustin A (inhibitor of tyrosine kinase). The present results indicate that histamine inhibits intestinal cholinergic neurotransmission through presynaptic H3 receptors coupled to Gi/Go proteins. It is suggested that adenylyl cyclase, serine-threonine protein kinase and tyrosine kinase pathways are not implicated in this regulatory action, and that Gi/Go proteins modulate the activity of N-type Ca2+ channels through a direct link, thus causing a reduced availability of extracellular Ca2+ at the level of ileal cholinergic nerve terminals.

The effects of histamine and the more selective H3 receptor agonist (R)alpha-methylhistamine were investigated on contractile responses produced by electrical stimulation of the longitudinal and circular muscles of the rat ileum and the circular muscle of the human colon. Histamine (0.1-3.0 microM) and (R)alpha-methylhistamine (0.1-3.0 microM) had no significant effect (P>0.05) on cholinergic nerve stimulation of either the longitudinal or circular muscle of the rat ileum nor the circular muscle of the human colon. Substance P (1 microM) and nicotine (0.1 microM), which both produce a contraction via activation of cholinergic nerves, were also unaffected by histamine (1 microM and 10 microM) or (R)alpha-methylhistamine (1 microM and 10 microM), in either tissue. Preliminary studies using in situ hybridisation histochemistry (ISHH) were performed in rat brain and ileum in an attempt to identify H3 receptor mRNA expression. This was done using 33P-labelled oligonucleotide-specific probes for rat H3 receptor mRNA. Unlike rat brain, where H3 receptor mRNA expression was found to be abundant in several regions, no H3 receptor mRNA expression could be detected in the rat ileum under the conditions used. These findings suggest H3 receptors have no role in the modulation of cholinergic neuronal function in the rat or human intestine unlike those in the guinea-pig. Furthermore, H3 receptors appear to be absent in the rat ileum.

To investigate whether H1 and H2 histamine receptors are implicated in the modulation of acetylcholine release by endogenous histamine, the ventral striatum of the conscious, freely moving rat was superfused by the push-pull superfusion technique with drugs and the release of acetylcholine was determined in the superfusate. Superfusion with the H1 receptor agonist 2-thiazolylethylamine (TEA, 50 micromol/l) enhanced the release of acetylcholine, while the H1 receptor antagonist triprolidine (50 micromol/l) reduced acetylcholine outflow and abolished the TEA-evoked release of the neurotransmitter. The inhibitory effect of triprolidine was not influenced either on simultaneous superfusion with 10 micromol/l (+/-)-7-bromo-1-(fluoresceinylthioureido)phenyl-8-hydroxy-3-methyl -2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-benzazepine (SKF-83566, D1 dopamine receptor antagonist) and 50 micromol/l quinpirole (D2/D3 dopamine receptor agonist) or on superfusion with the GABAA receptor antagonist bicuculline (50 micromol/l). The H2 receptor antagonists ranitidine or famotidine (50 micromol/l each) greatly enhanced acetylcholine release rate in the ventral striatum. Presuperfusion with alpha-fluoromethylhistidine (FMH, 1 mmol/l), which inhibits neuronal synthesis of histamine, abolished the famotidine-induced release of acetylcholine. The releasing effect of famotidine was also abolished on simultaneous superfusion with 10 micromol/l SKF-83566 and 50 micromol/l quinpirole. The release of acetylcholine elicited by famotidine was reversed to a decreased acetylcholine outflow when the striatum was superfused with the GABA(A) receptor antagonist bicuculline (50 micromol/l) prior to famotidine. Superfusion with the H2 receptor agonist impromidine (1 micromol/l) decreased acetylcholine outflow, while the H2 agonist dimaprit (50 micromol/l) exerted the opposite effect. The releasing effect of dimaprit was not influenced by FMH (1 mmol/l), but it was abolished in the presence of SKF-83566 (10 micromol/l) and quinpirole (50 micromol/l). In the presence of bicuculline the release of acetylcholine by dimaprit was enhanced and prolonged. It seems possible that dimaprit and impromidine stimulate different subtypes of H2 receptors. The findings suggest that the release of acetylcholine in the striatum is modulated by neighbouring histaminergic neurons in a complex way. Stimulation of H1 histamine receptors, probably located on cholinergic neurons, enhances acetylcholine release. Stimulation by histamine of H2 receptors located on cholinergic or GABAergic neurons enhances the release of acetylcholine, while stimulation of H2 receptors located on dopaminergic neurons exerts the opposite effect.

Selective H2- and H3-receptor agonists, exhibiting an at least tenfold higher potency than histamine itself at the respective receptors, have been known for several years. Selective H1-receptor agonists with a potency exceeding that of histamine have become available only recently; the most potent are methylhistaprodifen and dimethylhistaprodifen [Nalpha-methyl- and Nalpha,Nalpha-dimethyl-2(3,3-diphenylpropyl)histamine, respectively] with 3.4- and 2.4-fold higher potencies than histamine in vitro (in the guinea-pig ileum). The aim of the present study was to examine whether these compounds and the parent compound histaprodifen are potent H1-receptor agonists in the pithed and in the anaesthetized rat. In pithed, vagotomized rats diastolic blood pressure was decreased by 2-(2-thiazolyl)ethanamine i.v. (which was used as a reference H1-receptor agonist) and by histaprodifen, methylhistaprodifen, and dimethylhistaprodifen; the maximum decrease was about 45 mmHg for each compound, and the potencies, expressed as pED50, the negative logarithm of the dose (in mole per kilogram body weight) eliciting a half-maximal response, were 7.23, 7.55, 8.43 and 8.12, respectively. The dose/response curves of the four compounds were shifted to the right to about the same extent by the H1-receptor antagonist dimetindene (1 micromol/kg i.v.). The vasodepressor response was not affected by combined i.v. administration of the H2- and H3-receptor antagonists ranitidine and thioperamide, by combined i.v. administration of the alpha1- and alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonists prazosin and rauwolscine, and by the beta-adrenoceptor antagonist propranolol i.v. but was attenuated by the inhibitor of NO synthase, N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester i.v. In anaesthetized rats 2-(2-thiazolyl)ethanamine, histaprodifen, methylhistaprodifen and dimethylhistaprodifen i.v. also decreased diastolic blood pressure in a manner sensitive to dimetindene i.v. Our data show that histaprodifen and, in particular, methyl and dimethylhistaprodifen are highly potent H1-receptor agonists in vivo.

We have previously reported that the histaminergic system is involved in the control of pain perception, and that substances able to enhance histamine brain levels, such as the histamine-N-methyltransferase inhibitor, metoprine, induce antinociception. In the present study, in order to corroborate the idea of inducing antinociception by inhibiting histamine catabolism, the effects of a noncompetitive histamine-N-methyltransferase inhibitor. SKF 91488, were studied in rodents by means of tests inducing three different kinds of noxious stimuli: thermal (mouse hot plate), chemical (mouse abdominal constrictions) and mechanical (rat paw pressure). The ability to react to noxious stimuli was assessed by the rota-rod test. In addition, a competitive inhibitor of the histamine catabolism enzyme, BW 301 U, was studied in the hot plate test. SKF 91488 (30, 50 and 100 micrograms per animal i.c.v.) raised dose-dependently the pain threshold in all three tests. To verify whether SKF 91488-induced antinociception is due to inhibition of histamine-N-methyltransferase, (R)-alpha-methylhistamine, described to block histamine release and synthesis by stimulating the histamine H3-autoreceptor and activating the negative feed-back mechanism, was used. When administered at doses which do not alter the pain threshold per se, 0.5 microgram per rat i.c.v. or 10 mg kg-1 i.p. in mice, (R)-alpha-methylhistamine was able to antagonize significantly the antinociceptive effect induced by 30 micrograms per animal i.c.v. of SKF 91488. BW 301 U (30 and 100 mg kg-1 i.p.) showed a dose-dependent, long-lasting antinociception, which was also antagonized by pretreatment with (R)-alpha-methylhistamine. The present data show that the antinociceptive effect previously described for metoprine is not restricted to this molecule, but is also shared by other histamine-N-methyl-transferase inhibitors. This generalization provides further evidence to the importance of the histaminergic system in pain control mechanisms.

Our previous results demonstrate the occurrence of presynaptic inhibitory histamine H3 receptors on sympathetic neurons innervating resistance vessels of the pithed rat. The present study, in which new H3 receptor ligands with increased potency and selectivity (imetit, clobenpropit) were used, was designed to further explore the role of H3 receptors in the regulation of the rat cardiovascular system. In particular we were interested whether these receptors may be activated by endogenous histamine and whether they are detectable in an experimental model of hypertension. All experiments were performed on pithed and vagotomized rats treated with rauwolscine 1 mumol/kg. In normotensive Wistar rats the electrical (1 Hz, 1 ms, 50 V for 20 s) stimulation of the preganglionic sympathetic nerve fibres increased diastolic blood pressure by about 35 mmHg. Two H3 receptor agonists, R-(-)-alpha-methylhistamine and imetit, inhibited the electrically induced increase in diastolic blood pressure in a dose-dependent manner. The maximal effect (about 25%) was obtained for R-(-)-alpha-methylhistamine at about 10 mumol/kg and for imetit at about 1 mumol/kg. Two H3 receptor antagonists, thioperamide 1 mumol/kg and clobenpropit 0.1 mumol/kg, attenuated the inhibitory effect of imetit. The neurogenic vasopressor response was increased by about 15% by thioperamide 1 mumol/kg and clobenpropit 0.1 mumol/kg and decreased by 25% by the histamine methyltransferase inhibitor metoprine 37 mumol/kg. R-(-)-alpha-Methylhistamine, imetit, thioperamide, clobenpropit and metoprine did not affect the vasopressor response to exogenously added noradrenaline 0.01 mumol/kg (which increased diastolic blood pressure by about 40 mmHg). Metoprine had only a very low affinity for H3 binding sites (labelled by 3H-N alpha-methylhistamine; pKi 4.46). In pithed Wistar Kyoto (WKY) and spontaneously hypertensive (SHR) rats, electrical (1 Hz, 1 ms, 50 V for 10 s) stimulation increased diastolic blood pressure by 28 and 37 mmHg, respectively. Imetit inhibited the neurogenic vasopressor response to about the same extent in WKY and SHR rats (maximal effect of about 30%). The inhibitory influence of imetit was diminished by thioperamide 1 mumol/kg to about the same degree in rats of either strain. The present study confirms the occurrence of presynaptic H3 receptors on sympathetic nerve fibres involved in the inhibition of the neurogenic vasopressor response. Moreover, it demonstrates that these H3 receptors are probably activated by endogenous histamine and appear to be operative in hypertension.

The effects of intra-arterial injection of different doses of the selective histamine H3-receptor agonist R-alpha-methylhistamine and the selective histamine H3-receptor antagonist thioperamide on basal and electrically evoked noradrenaline overflow in the portal vein as well as on mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were investigated in permanently instrumented freely moving rats. R-alpha-Methylhistamine (0.01, 0.1 and 1 mumol/kg) inhibited the evoked noradrenaline overflow up to 43%, the ED50 value being 0.013 mumol/kg. Thioperamide (0.1, 0.5 and 1.0 mumol/kg) antagonized the effect of 1.0 mumol/kg R-alpha-methylhistamine dose-dependently, evoked overflow returning to control values at 1.0 mumol/kg of the antagonist; thioperamide alone had no effect on electrically evoked noradrenaline overflow. Basal noradrenaline levels, blood pressure and heart rate were not at all influenced by R-alpha-methylhistamine and thioperamide, alone or in combination. The results clearly show the presence of prejunctional histamine H3-receptors inhibiting the electrically evoked noradrenaline overflow from vascular sympathetic nerve terminals in the portal vein of freely moving rats.

The cardiovascular effects of the new histamine H2 receptor agonist amthamine were studied in the anaesthetized rat, with particular reference to a possible interaction with the adrenergic system. Amthamine (0.03-3 mumol/kg i.v.) caused vasodepressor responses which were antagonized by famotidine (3 mumol/kg i.v.). At higher doses (30-100 mumol/kg i.v.), amthamine induced a modest increase in the mean arterial pressure, which was significantly enhanced by the blockade of H2 receptors and significantly reduced by the alpha 2 adrenoceptor antagonist yohimbine (1 mumol/kg i.v.). The vasopressor response to amthamine was not modified in rats pre-treated with reserpine or 6-hydroxydopamine, and was only minimally modified in adrenalectomized animals, thus suggesting a predominant interaction with postjunctional alpha 2 adrenoceptors in the vascular muscle. The H2 receptor agonist dimaprit (0.3-100 mumol/kg i.v.) caused a reduction in arterial pressure, which was antagonized by famotidine, no pressor response being unmasked. Dimaprit (0.1-30 mumol/kg i.v.) did not modify heart rate but caused a modest bradycardia at 100 mumol/kg i.v. Amthamine (1-100 mumol/kg i.v.) induced a dose-dependent tachycardia, which was only partially (approximately 20%) reduced by famotidine and was totally blocked by propranolol (0.3 mg/kg i.v.). This effect was significantly reduced in rats pre-treated with reserpine or 6-hydroxydopamine and was further reduced by cocaine, thus suggesting a tyramine-like action of amthamine. In conclusion, these data demonstrate that the H2 receptor agonist amthamine can also interact with the adrenergic system when used at doses higher than those necessary to activate H2 receptors. Whereas the increase in blood pressure induced by amthamine seems to be mainly mediated by a direct activation of postjunctional alpha 2 adrenoceptors, the increase in heart rate is predominantly due to neuronal release of catecholamines. These effects should be considered when using amthamine in cardiovascular or other studies when high doses are employed.

Several gastric functions are modulated by the sympathetic nervous system, but local mechanisms involved in the control of noradrenaline release are largely unknown. Overflow of endogenous noradrenaline was studied from isolated rat stomach incubated in Ussing chambers allowing the separate determination of mucosal and serosal overflow. Spontaneous noradrenaline overflow was similar at the mucosal and serosal side, but electrical field stimulation caused a frequency-dependent increase in noradrenaline overflow selectively at the serosal side. Evoked noradrenaline overflow was blocked by tetrodotoxin, not affected by indometacin and markedly enhanced (by about 250%) by yohimbine. In the presence of indometacin and yohimbine, sulprostone (an agonist at EP1/EP3 receptors) and misoprostol (an agonist at EP2/EP3 receptors) reduced the noradrenaline overflow evoked by stimulation at 3 Hz maximally by about 80% (EC50: 6 nmol/l and 11 nmol/l, respectively). The EP1 receptor selective antagonist AH 6809 (6-isopropoxy-9-oxoxanthene-2-carboxylic acid) did not antagonize the inhibition by sulprostone. Noradrenaline overflow evoked by stimulation at 1 Hz and 3 Hz was increased by scopolamine by about 50% and almost completely inhibited by oxotremorine. Neither, histamine nor the H3 receptor selective agonist (R)-alpha-methyl-histamine, nor the H1, H2 and H3 selective receptor antagonists mepyramine, cimetidine and thioperamide significantly affected noradrenaline overflow evoked by stimulation at 1 Hz or 3 Hz. In conclusion, impulse-induced noradrenaline release in the rat stomach is controlled by multiple presynaptic mechanisms involving alpha 2-adrenergic autoreceptors, EP3 prostanoid and muscarine heteroreceptors, whereas histaminergic mechanisms do not appear to be significant.

The cardiovascular responses to a series of selective histamine H3 receptor agonists, (R) alpha-methylhistamine, imetit and immepip and selective antagonists, thioperamide, clobenpropit and clophenpropit, were studied in anaesthetized rats. At 0.003-1 mumol/kg i.v. doses, H3 agonists failed to produce any significant change in the basal blood pressure and heart rate. Larger doses of (R) alpha-methylhistamine increased the blood pressure and heart rate and higher doses of imetit caused vasodepressor responses and reduced heart rate, whereas immepip proved virtually inactive. While (R) alpha-methylhistamine-induced effects were not blocked by histamine H1-, H2- and H3-receptor antagonists, they were however reduced by idazoxan and propranolol, which indicates that the mechanisms involved are adrenergic. The effects induced by imetit are not related to histamine H3 receptors but are mediated by indirect (via 5HT3 receptors) cholinergic mechanisms, since these effects were prevented by 1 mg/kg i.v. atropine and by 0.1 mg/kg i.v. ondansetron. Similarly, the H3 antagonists per se failed to change basal cardiovascular function up to 10 mumol/kg i.v. and only at 30 mumol/kg i.v. were marked decreases observed in the blood pressure and heart rate with a significant reduction in the effects of noradrenaline. These data indicate that in anaesthetized rats, histamine H3 receptor activation or blockade has no effect on basal cardiovascular function. The effects recorded after the administration of large doses of (R) alpha-methylhistamine and imetit are clearly unrelated to histamine H3 receptors and should be taken into account when using these compounds as H3 ligands for "in vivo" experiments.

The nature of the histamine receptor mediating inhibition of 5-HT release was investigated in strips of the porcine small intestine by investigating the effects of histamine ligands on the overflow of endogenous 5-HT and its metabolite 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA). The overflow was measured by HPLC, combined with electrochemical detection and represents calcium-sensitive 5-HT release from enterochromaffin cells, as reported previously. The histamine H3 receptor selective agonists (R)-alpha-methyl-histamine and imetit inhibited the overflow of 5-HT maximally by 50-60%, with EC50 values of 48 and 3.2 nmol/l, respectively. Effects on 5-HT overflow were always accompanied by similar effects on the overflow of 5-HIAA. Thioperamide (100 nmol/l) shifted the concentration response curve of (R)-alpha-methyl-histamine to the right (pKB value 8.38). The inhibitory effect of 1 mumol/l (R)-alpha-methyl-histamine was antagonized in a concentration-dependent manner by thioperamide (IC50: 65 nmol/l) and dimaprit (IC50: 8.6 mumol/l); however, the effect of (R)-alpha-methyl-histamine was weakly antagonized by burimamide (by 38% at 100 mumol/l) and not significantly affected by other H3 receptor antagonists, such as impromidine, betahistine and phenyl-butanoyl-histamine (each up to 100 mumol/l). In conclusion, H3 receptors mediating inhibition of 5-HT release from porcine enterochromaffin cells have a particular pharmacological profile indicating that heterogeneity of H3 receptors may exist. The data suggest that histamine H3 receptors modulating 5-HT release in pig small intestine do not belong to either H3A or H3B receptors as defined in rat tissue.

The results of binding studies suggest the presence of histamine H1-receptors in human monocytes, but it is not known whether these receptors are functionally active. This prompted us to study the effects of histamine (HA) on cytosolic Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) and superoxide anion (O2-) formation in HL-60 cells differentiated towards monocytes with 1 alpha,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol. In HL-60 monocytes, HA increased [Ca2+]i with a half-maximal effect at 8 microM and a maximum at 30-100 microM. Pertussis toxin (PTX) partially inhibited the stimulatory effects of HA on [Ca2+]i. Betahistine, a weak partial H1-receptor agonist, also increased [Ca2+]i, whereas H2- and H3-receptor agonists were ineffective. H1- but not H2- and H3-receptor antagonists inhibited HA-induced rises in [Ca2+]i. HA-induced rises in [Ca2+]i were desensitized in a homologous manner and were also inhibited by the activator of protein kinase C, 4 beta-phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate. Various protein kinase C inhibitors did not interfere with homologous desensitization. The stimulatory effects of HA on [Ca2+]i were completely dependent on the presence of extracellular Ca2+ and were inhibited by the blocker of non-selective cation (NSC) channels, 1-(beta-[3-(4-methoxyphenyl)propoxyl]-4-methoxyphenethyl)-1 H-imidazole hydrochloride (SK & F 96365). HA was much less effective than the chemotactic peptide, N-formyl-L-methionyl-L-leucyl-L-phenylalanine (fMLP), to induce rises in [Ca2+]i. Unlike fMLP, HA did not activate O2- formation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

In superfused rat brain cortex slices and synaptosomes preincubated with [3H]noradrenaline the effect of agonists or antagonists at presynaptic H3 receptors on NMDA-evoked [3H]noradrenaline release was investigated. In experiments on slices, histamine and the preferential H3 receptor agonist R-(-)-alpha-methylhistamine inhibited NMDA-evoked tritium overflow (IC20 values 0.27 mumol/l or 0.032 mumol/l, respectively); S-(+)-alpha-methylhistamine (up to 10 mumol/l) as well as the selective H1 receptor agonist (2-(2-thiazolyl)ethylamine and the selective H2 receptor agonist dimaprit (each up to 10 mumol/l) were ineffective. The H3 receptor antagonist thioperamide abolished the inhibitory effect of histamine whereas the preferential H1 receptor antagonist dimetindene and the preferential H2 receptor antagonist ranitidine were ineffective. In experiments on synaptosomes, histamine and R-(-)-alpha-methylhistamine inhibited NMDA-evoked tritium overflow, whereas 2-(2-thiazolyl)ethylamine or dimaprit had no effect. The inhibitory effect of histamine was abolished by thioperamide. When tritium overflow was stimulated by NMDA in the presence of omega-conotoxin GVIA (which by itself decreased the response to NMDA by about 55%), R-(-)-alpha-methylhistamine did not inhibit NMDA-evoked overflow. It is concluded that NMDA-evoked noradrenaline release in the cerebral cortex can be modulated by inhibitory H3 receptors. NMDA receptors and H3 receptors are both located presynaptically and may interact at the same noradrenergic varicosity. An unimpaired function of the N-type voltage-sensitive calcium channel probably is a prerequisite for the inhibition of NMDA-evoked noradrenaline release by H3 receptor stimulation.

We determined the affinities of nordimaprit, homodimaprit, clobenpropit and imetit for H3 binding sites (labelled by 3H-N alpha-methylhistamine) in rat brain cortex homogenates and their potencies at presynaptic H3A receptors on noradrenergic nerve endings in mouse brain cortex slices. 3H-N alpha-Methylhistamine bound saturably to rat brain cortex homogenates with a Kd of 0.70 nmol/l and a Bmax of 98 fmol/mg protein. Binding of 3H-N alpha-methylhistamine was displaced monophasically by dimaprit (pKi 6.55), nordimaprit (5.94), homodimaprit (6.44), clobenpropit (9.16), imetit (9.83), R-(-)-alpha-methylhistamine (8.87) and histamine (8.20), and biphasically by burimamide (pKi high 7.73, pKi low 5.97). In superfused mouse brain cortex slices preincubated with 3H-noradrenaline, the electrically (0.3 Hz) evoked tritium overflow was inhibited by imetit (pIC35 8.93), R-(-)-alpha-methylhistamine (7.87) and histamine (7.03). The effect of histamine was attenuated by nordimaprit, homodimaprit, clobenpropit and N-ethoxycarbonyl-2- ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline (EEDQ); EEDQ (but not nordimaprit, homodimaprit and clobenpropit) attenuated the effect of histamine also in slices pre-exposed to the drug 60-30 min prior to superfusion. The concentration-response curve of histamine was shifted to the right by homodimaprit and clobenpropit; Schild plots yielded straight lines with a slope of unity for both drugs (pA2 5.94 and 9.55, respectively). Nordimaprit depressed the maximum effect of histamine (pD'2 5.55) and also slightly increased the concentration of histamine producing the half-maximum effect.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Frequency-dependent pupillary dilations were evoked by electrical stimulation of the pre- or post-ganglionic cervical sympathetic nerve (sympatho-excitation) or the hypothalamus (parasympatho-inhibition) in sympathectomized anesthetized cats. Systemic administration of the selective histamine H3 receptor agonist (R)-alpha-methylhistamine (R alpha MeHA) produced a dose-dependent depression of mydriasis due to direct neural sympathetic activation but had no effect on responses elicited by parasympathetic withdrawal. The histamine H2 receptor agonist, dimaprit, was inactive. R alpha MeHA was much more effective in depressing sympathetic responses obtained at lower frequencies when compared to higher frequencies of stimulation. Responses evoked both pre- and postganglionically were inhibited by R alpha MeHA. This peripheral sympatho-inhibitory action of R alpha MeHA was antagonized by the histamine H3 receptor blocker thioperamide but not by intravenous pretreatment with the histamine H1 receptor antagonist chlorpheniramine. Histamine H2 receptor blockers cimetidine and ranitidine were also without effect. R alpha MeHA did not depress pupillary responses elicited by i.v. (-)-adrenaline. The results demonstrate that histamine H3 receptors modulate sympathetic activation of the iris at a site proximal to the iris dilator muscle. The predominant mechanism of action appears to the prejunctional inhibition of noradrenaline release from postganglionic sympathetic nerve endings. However, a concomitant ganglionic inhibitory action cannot be excluded.

In pithed and vagotomized rats the effects of the H3 receptor agonist R-(-)-alpha-methylhistamine, the H1 receptor agonist 2-(2-thiazolyl)ethylamine and the H2 receptor agonist dimaprit on basal diastolic blood pressure, basal heart rate and the electrically induced rise in heart rate were examined. Basal diastolic blood pressure was not altered by low, but increased by high doses of R-(-)-alpha-methylhistamine; the latter effect was not affected by selective H1, H2 or H3 receptor antagonists and by prazosin, but was attenuated by rauwolscine. Rauwolscine also unmasked a vasodepressor response to R-(-)-alpha-methylhistamine not affected by the H3 receptor antagonist thioperamide, but counteracted by the H1 receptor antagonist dimetindene or the H2 receptor antagonist ranitidine. The vasodepressor responses to 2-(2-thiazolyl)ethylamine and dimaprit were antagonized by dimetindene and ranitidine, respectively. The vasodepressor response to 2-(2-thiazolyl)ethylamine was not altered by indomethacin, but reduced by an inhibitor of endothelial nitric oxide synthase, N omega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (which, by itself, markedly increased blood pressure). Both drug tools did not alter the effect of dimaprit. Basal heart rate was not affected by 2-(2-thiazolyl)ethylamine (examined after administration of propranolol), dimaprit and R-(-)-alpha-methylhistamine. The electrically induced increase in heart rate (studied in animals which had received rauwolscine) was decreased by R-(-)-alpha-methylhistamine but not affected by 2-(2-thiazolyl)ethylamine and dimaprit. The effect of R-(-)-alpha-methylhistamine was abolished by thioperamide. R-(-)-alpha-methylhistamine did not influence the increase in heart rate produced by isoprenaline.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)