1. Experimental evidence of frequency-dependent selection on group behaviour
- Author
-
Steven T. Cassidy, Brendan L. McEwen, Noa Pinter-Wollman, Gabriella M Najm, and Jonathan N. Pruitt
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,genetic structures ,Frequency-dependent selection ,Foraging ,010603 evolutionary biology ,01 natural sciences ,Intraspecific competition ,Predation ,03 medical and health sciences ,Animals ,Selection, Genetic ,Social Behavior ,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics ,Selection (genetic algorithm) ,030304 developmental biology ,0303 health sciences ,Ecology ,biology ,fungi ,Spiders ,biology.organism_classification ,Variation (linguistics) ,Phenotype ,Evolutionary biology ,Starvation ,Predatory Behavior ,Social animal ,Female ,Social spider - Abstract
Evolutionary ecologists often seek to identify the mechanisms maintaining intraspecific variation. In social animals, whole groups can exhibit between-group differences in their collective traits. We examined whether negative frequency-dependent selection (that is, a rare-type advantage) could help to maintain between-group variation. We engineered neighbourhoods of social spider colonies bearing bold or shy foraging phenotypes and monitored their fecundity in situ. We found that bold colonies enjoyed a rare-type advantage that is lost as the frequency of bold colonies in a neighbourhood increases. The success of shy colonies was not frequency dependent. These dynamics seem to be driven by a foraging advantage of bold colonies that is lost in bold neighbourhoods because prey become scarce, and shy colonies perform better than bold colonies under low-resource conditions. Thus, to understand selection on collective traits, it is insufficient to examine groups in isolation. The phenotypic environment in which groups reside and compete must also be considered.
- Published
- 2018