Search

Reverse shoulder prostheses are increasingly used for treatment of rotator cuff tear arthropathy and other degenerative shoulder diseases. In recent years, aiming for bone stock preservation has led to the design of metaphyseal humeral components without a stem. The aims of this study were to evaluate the complication and reintervention rates, as well as the clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with stemless implants. A systematic review of the literature was completed until May 2020 using PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane databases, according to PRISMA guidelines. The literature search revealed 2942 studies, of which 13 were included in this review, with a total of 517 patients and a mean follow-up between 6.4 and 101.6 months. The total complication rate was 6.5%, while 3.3% were humeral associated complications. Finally, the rate of shoulders that underwent a reintervention was 6.7%, with 1.4% relating to a humeral component reason. Stemless RSA led to substantial improvements in patient reported outcome measures and range of motion across all studies. Scapular notching was reported in 15.2%, and lucencies around humeral component were reported in 0.8% of shoulders. Stemless RSA resulted in low complication and reintervention rates at the mid-term follow-up. The reported clinical and radiological outcomes showed that these prostheses have at least equivalent outcomes with their stemmed counterparts. Further studies are required to investigate the long-term longevity and performance of the stemless humeral implants. Level IV; Systematic Review

Recently, hybrid glenoid components have been developed, consisting of cementless highly porous metal central peg, monoblock keel or cage along with cemented backside polyethylene surface. The aims of this study were twofold: (1) to determine the revision and complication rates of hybrid glenoid components, consisting of porous metal pegs or coatings attached to the polyethylene, for aseptic loosening in TSA and (2) to evaluate the rate of radiolucent lines in patients who underwent TSA with hybrid glenoid components consisting of porous metal pegs or coatings attached to the polyethylene. The US National Library of Medicine (PubMed/MEDLINE), EMBASE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were queried for publications utilizing the following keywords: "hybrid" OR "bone-ingrowth" OR "bone ingrowth" AND "TSA" OR "total" AND "shoulder" AND "arthroplasty" OR "replacement". Five articles were included for analysis (470 operated shoulders, mean follow-up: 47.5 months). The overall weighted mean modified methodology Coleman score was 51.2/100, indicating a moderate level of overall methodological quality. The survival rate of hybrid glenoid components was 97.4% (458 out of 470 cases), while the rate of glenoid-related complications was 2.8% (13 cases). Finally, there were 54 cases (out of 313 reported; 17.3%) with glenoid radiolucency (none of them required revision). TSA with hybrid fixation glenoid components was associated with high survivorship and low rate of glenoid component-related complications at 4 years mean follow-up. In addition, there was limited evidence to show that the short- to mid-term outcome of TSA using hybrid glenoid components is not inferior to the outcome of cemented all-polyethylene glenoid components.

Open reduction and internal fixation with a locking plate are performed frequently to treat fractures of the proximal humerus. Avascular necrosis and non-union or malunion are potential complications of this procedure, which lead to specific fracture sequelae. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiological results of patients treated by removal of a failed locking plate of the proximal humerus and simultaneous implantation of a reverse total shoulder prosthesis. Twenty-one patients (f = 17, m = 4; mean age 70 years) out of 29 patients were available for follow-up after a mean period of 45 (30–65) months. At follow-up, all patients were assessed with the constant score and the ASES score as well as plain radiographs. In comparison with the preoperative values, abduction (31° vs. 115°; p

To determine whether lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO) and mini-stem humeral components (MSHCs) can be safely and effectively used together in total and hemi-shoulder arthroplasty (TSA/HHA). This is a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent anatomic TSA/HHA utilizing combined LTO/MSHC with minimum 2-year follow-up. Six-week and final radiographs, range of motion, pain scores, and selected outcome measures were assessed. Seventy five shoulders with mean follow-up of 27.8 months (24–50 months) were analyzed. Sixty-seven (89.3%) shoulders had uneventful LTO healing. There were five (6.67%) LTO failures, one (1.33%) fibrous union, and two (2.67%) osteotomies that had displaced > 4 mm at 6 weeks; four of the five failures required open repair, including one converted to reverse TSA. The other failure, the fibrous union, and the two displaced osteotomies were without clinical deficits and elected for non-operative management. One patient required intraoperative conversion to a long stem due to concern that metaphyseal bone integrity was compromised, in part, by the LTO. Four (5.33%) stems subsided, with one of them also being frankly loose and requiring revision, while the other three were asymptomatic, not requiring treatment. No other stems were judged to be loose. Mean ASES, SANE, VAS, forward flexion, external rotation, and internal rotation all improved significantly (p

To report the outcomes and complications of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCT) and cuff tear arthropathy (CTA). A systematic review of the literature contained in Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, Google Scholar and Ovid databases was conducted on May 1, 2016, according to PRISMA guidelines. The key words “reverse total shoulder arthroplasty” or “reverse total shoulder prostheses” with “rotator cuff tears”; “failed rotator cuff surgery”; “massive rotator cuff tears”; “irreparable rotator cuff tears”; “cuff tear arthropathy”; “outcomes”; “complications” were matched. All articles reporting outcomes and complications of RSA for the management of MIRCT or CTA were included. The comparison between preoperative and postoperative clinical scores, as well as range of motion (ROM), was performed using the Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test. P values lower than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Seven articles were included in our qualitative synthesis. A statistically significant improvement in all clinical scores and ROM was found comparing the preoperative value with the postoperative value. The degrees of retroversion of the humeral stem of the RSA do not influence the functional outcomes in a statistically significant fashion. There were 17.4% of complications. The most frequent was heterotopic ossification, occurring in 6.6% of patients. Revision surgery was necessary in 7.3% of patients. RSA restores pain-free ROM and improves function of the shoulder in patients with MIRCT or CTA. However, complications occur in a high percentage of patients. The lack of level I studies limits the real understanding of the potentials and limitations of RSA for the management of MIRCT and CTA.

To evaluate whether stemless shoulder implants in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients provide comparable functional outcomes to patients with osteoarthritis or post-traumatic arthritis. In addition, the study assessed for differences in incidence of radiolucent lines or proximal humeral bone loss during radiographic follow-up.Consecutive stemless shoulder arthroplasties performed in RA patients and a matched control group were retrospectively identified between February 2012 and 2018. Thirty-five patients were included in each group: 24 total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and 11 hemiarthroplasty (HA). Patients were evaluated annually using the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and radiographically.The mean OSS significantly improved in all groups until 24 months. The mean improvement for RA TSA and HA patients at 24 months was 19.86 (95% CI 10.66-29.05, p = 0.0004) and 19.71 (95% CI 7.33-32.31, p = 0.0084), respectively. The mean improvement in the control TSA and HA patients at 24 months was 20.86 (95% CI 17-24.71, p = 0.0001) and 17.86 (95% CI 1.36-34.35, p = 0.0381), respectively. During the study period, two patients in the RA TSA group (8%), one patient in the control TSA group (4%) and one patient in the control HA group (9%) required revision. The proportion of progressive proximal humeral bone loss after TSA was 33% in the RA group and 13% in the control group.Stemless shoulder implants can provide significant improvement in functional scores in RA patients in the short term. However, early bone loss around the humeral implant is a concern and the authors recommend long-term clinical and radiological follow-up.

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) represents a good solution for the management of patients with fracture of the proximal humerus with associated severe osteoporosis and RC dysfunction. A systematic review of the literature according to the PRISMA guidelines was performed matching the following keywords: "reverse total shoulder arthroplasty"; "reverse total shoulder prostheses"; "fractures"; "fracture of the proximal humerus." Medline, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Ovid database have been screened. Ten studies were considered in the qualitative analysis. No randomized prospective controlled trials have been found. A total of 256 patients received a RTSA for the management of fracture of the proximal humerus. There were 28 males (10.8 %) and 228 females (89.2 %). The mean age of patients was 75.5 ± 2.2 years (range 70-78 years). The mean follow-up period was 27.8 ± 21.8 months range (6-86 months). Overall, the mean Constant score was 56.7 ± 7.6 points (range 44-67.8 points), the mean DASH score was 39.9 ± 6 points (range 31.5-46.8 points), the ASES averaged 70.3 ± 6.8 points (range 65-78 points), and the OSS averaged 28.7 points (range 15-56 points). RTSA restores function and relieves pain in patients with proximal humeral fractures. However, no randomized controlled trials are available to support RTSA versus osteosintesis, anatomical prostheses or hemiarthroprotesis. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of RTSA in the management of fracture of the proximal humerus.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is based on the biomechanical advantages of lengthening the deltoid while medializing its center of rotation (COR). Little evidence exists describing the clinical benefits of these biomechanical advantages. The purpose of this study is to assess the relationship between deltoid lengthening and medialization of the COR with functional outcomes for RSA patients. We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with primary RSA. Radiographic measurements of deltoid length and COR, assessment of forward elevation (FE) and external rotation (ER), and functional outcome scores were obtained pre- and postoperatively. Linear regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship between these radiographic measurements and changes in shoulder functionality. On average, patients improved significantly in function and functional outcome scores. Postoperative COR correlated weakly with postoperative FE. There were weakly negative correlations between increase in acromion to greater tuberosity distance and postoperative FE, and between deltoid lengthening and FE improvement. Our results suggest that deltoid lengthening does not correlate with improvements in active FE or ER. These findings could indicate that change in deltoid length is less important than previously thought. Furthermore, the negative correlations seen could indicate that there is over-tensioning of the deltoid in specific cases. Further studies are needed to better assess the role of deltoid length and other factors that may impact RSA outcomes.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is an effective surgery for a variety of patients with difficult shoulder pathology. Since postsurgical outcomes are often variable, there has been great effort made to optimize the design and use of these implants. Previous studies demonstrated an association between increased glenosphere size and improved range of motion. The purpose of this study is to assess the relationship between glenosphere size, range of motion, and functional outcome scores. This is a retrospective cohort study of 140 patients (148 shoulders) undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty. All patients were assessed pre- and postoperatively for range of motion, Constant score, ASES score, and Subjective Shoulder Value. Improvements in these variables were compared for patients treated with three different glenosphere sizes (36, 40, 42 mm). All groups had a mean improvement in range of motion and functional outcome scores, but there were no statistically significant differences between groups when controlling for preoperative differences. Our findings do not support a strong role for glenosphere size as a singular factor affecting range of motion or patient-reported outcome following RSA. These problems are most likely due to the multifactorial nature of shoulder dynamics. For this reason, assessing the effect a single surgical or biomechanical parameter on function has been challenging.

The purpose of this paper is to provide up-to-date guidelines on rehabilitation after anatomical shoulder prosthesis for concentric shoulder osteoarthritis, as previous guidelines date back to late 1970s and are no longer adequate due to the evolution of prosthesis models and surgical techniques.The physiatric committee of the Italian Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (SICSeG-Società Italiana di Chirurgia della Spalla e del Gomito) performed a search for all the existing literature related to rehabilitation after shoulder replacement. A total of 29 papers concerning shoulder rehabilitation were reviewed. In addition, the main Italian orthopedic surgeons and physiatrists dealing with shoulder surgery and rehabilitation were interviewed to obtain indications when literature was not conclusive.From literature evaluation and expert consultation, we produced guidelines concerning: patient evaluation by means of adequate rating scales, preoperative treatment, early intermediate and advanced postoperative phases, rehabilitation of scapulo-thoracic joint, return to work and sports, length of rehabilitation and follow-up.This proposal for guidelines was presented during the 11th SICSeG Congress on May 2012 and to the main scientific societies concerned in shoulder surgery and rehabilitation. A consensus conference is needed in order to formalize and make them usable from all the professional figures involved in this field.

Is reverse total shoulder arthroplasty a feasible treatment option for failed shoulder arthroplasty? A retrospective study of 44 cases with special regards to stemless and stemmed primary implants.Due to humeral or glenoid bone-loss and rotator cuff insufficiency reverse total shoulder arthroplasty often means the only remaining treatment option in revision shoulder arthroplasty. This study investigates the clinical outcome of patients treated with a reverse total shoulder in revision cases with special regard to stemless and stemmed primary implants.From 2010 to 2012 60 failed shoulder arthroplasties were converted to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Forty-four patients were available for follow-up after a mean of 24 months. Patients were assessed with X-rays, Constant- and ASES Score and a questionnaire about their subjective satisfaction.The total number of observed complications was seven (16%). Ninety-eight percent of the patients were satisfied with their clinical result. Patients achieved a mean normalized constant score of 70.2% and a mean ASES Score of 65.3. Patients with stemless primary implants achieved a higher normalized constant score than patients with stemmed primary implants (82 vs. 61.8%; p = 0009).Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty provides satisfactory clinical results and a high patient satisfaction in revision shoulder arthroplasty. The complication rate needs to be considered and discussed with the patient prior to surgery. Presence or absence of a stem of revised shoulder arthroplasties interferes with the outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: (Retrospective study).

Glenoid bone defect and excessive medialization could represent challenging issues during reverse shoulder arthroplasty, especially in the setting of revision surgery. Although a solution is offered by the Boileau's BIO-RSA technique in primary cases, only autologous iliac crest bone graft and homologous graft from bone banks are available for revision surgeries, with known disadvantages and risk of graft resorption and implant failure.We describe in this work a new technique based on a customized porous tantalum device to be used in salvage situations, aimed at lateralization of the glenoid component of a reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Between 2014 and 2015, five patients received a customized tantalum-augmented RSA at our institution. The augments we applied are actually on the market for acetabular bone loss management: these were opportunely prepared and fixed to the metal back of the glenoid component before implantation.In the five cases treated, no major or minor complications have been recorded to date. Despite the short follow-up, all the implants are still in situ. All of the patients referred complete subjective satisfaction and return to their daylife activities without pain within 4 months after surgery.The customized tantalum-augmented RSA technique represents in our experience a useful and safe solution in managing glenoid bone loss and medialization. Adaptability to virtually every device in the market should be regarded as important point of strength of this technique.

Four-part proximal humeral fractures are frequently treated with shoulder replacement. Outcome of this procedure has not been standardized, and there are controversy data on range of motion (ROM) and active function of the shoulder. The aim of this study is to compare shoulder prosthesis position (SPP) in terms of version of humeral head and height of stem with clinical subjective and objective outcome. Fifty patients were treated with shoulder hemiarthroplasty for four-part proximal humeral fracture or fracture-dislocation of the humeral head. Radiological examination and CT-scan were performed preoperatively and at follow-up. Clinical outcome evaluation included active and passive ROM, and subjective perspective collected through SF-36, OSQ, ASES, and DASH. No significant correlation between stem height and clinical outcome were found. The prosthesis version correlates with all subjective questionnaires. The ROM was not correlated with stem height and prosthesis version. SPP involves clinical outcome, with great relevance of implant version.

Posterior dislocation of the shoulder is an unusual injury that most often occurs secondary to a high-energy trauma. Unfortunately the diagnosis is commonly missed, thus making its treatment a challenge. Neglected posterior dislocation is mainly characterised by an impression fracture on the anterior articular surface of the humeral head, which makes the dislocation often difficult to reduce. Diagnosis is based upon a careful history assessment, physical examination and radiological findings. Several treatment approaches have been described. The modified MacLaughlin procedure in our hands has been shown to be a reproducible technique allowing good results at medium- and long-term follow-up. According to our experience it is possible to adopt this technique also in patients with a locked posterior dislocation older than 6 months or in cases with a humeral head defect up to 50% when a shoulder prosthesis is not a good indication. Poorer results should be expected in patients with an associated fracture of the proximal humerus.

The aim of this study is to report the clinical and radiological results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) in elderly patients who have been treated for complex humeral fractures. From January 2005 to December 2014, we have implanted rTSA for proximal humeral fractures in 95 patients (80 womens, 15 mens) about 75 years old on average (range 62–95 years). All rates and results on intraoperative and postoperative complications have been collected in a specific database. In all cases we have used a modular implant prosthesis (Lima Corporate, San Daniele del Friuli, Italy). The prosthesis was implanted cementless in 92 cases. Because of the presence of a high percentage of comorbidities in the elderly patients, we have retrospectively analyzed the necessity of a secondary hospitalization, from a week to a 6-month time after the discharge, due to general health problems and specific postoperative shoulder complications. The mean follow-up was 5 years (range 1–9 years) for 70 of 95 patients, 50 of whom had adequate radiographic controls. None of 95 patients has required a reoperation or a hospitalization for general health problems from 1 week to 6 months postoperative. No early or late infection of prosthesis has been observed. There were seven cases of perioperative complications, three humeral vertical bone fissuring, two glenoid fractures and two cases of deltoid muscle damage. We have had three cases of postoperative hematoma and one case of ulnar nerve neuropathy. The mean constant score was 85.4, and the mean simple shoulder test was 7.4. We have observed a grade 1 scapular notching in 15 cases (30 %). In the remaining 35 reviewed cases, there was no notching. Peri-articular heterotopic ossifications were found in 11 cases (22 %). Reverse shoulder prosthesis in complex humeral fractures in the elderly can be considered as a reliable surgical procedure, which leads to very good clinical and radiological results in case of cementless prosthesis, as well.

Total reverse shoulder arthroplasty is becoming more and more the standard therapeutic practice for glenohumeral arthropathy with massive lesions of the rotator cuff. The biomechanical principle of this prosthesis is represented by the reversion of the normal anatomy of the shoulder joint. This non-anatomical prosthesis leads to a medialization of the rotation centre of the glenohumeral joint and also to a distalization of the humeral head. All that causes a deltoid tension increasing so allowing a larger abduction of the arm. Main complications of the reverse shoulder prosthesis are due to the joint instability, the scapular notching and the wear of the polyethylene insert. The main goal of the present work is to study the effect of the positioning of the humeral component on the intrinsic stability of the reverse shoulder prosthesis. In particular, through finite element method simulations, the variation of the stability ratio of the shoulder joint has been calculated for both vertical and horizontal dislocating loads depending on the humeral stem version angle. Moreover, in order to estimate the wear of the polyethylene cup, some analyses have been developed to calculate the pressures on the polyethylene insert. The obtained results demonstrate the dislocation of a shoulder prosthesis and the wear of the polyethylene insert can be prevented or limited by conveniently varying the version angle of the humeral component.