Search

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) knowledge is a prerequisite for active patient engagement in medical decision-making. Treatment of relapses in MS is a clinical field with many uncertainties and each acute relapse requires decisions regarding possible options for action, indicating the need for patient involvement. However, there is no validated instrument assessing relapse knowledge in people with MS. Our study aims to develop a valid MS relapse questionnaire for use as an outcome instrument for educational interventions., Methods: A multidisciplinary panel developed the relapse knowledge questionnaire (RKQ) based on a previously developed questionnaire. We tested the RKQ on MS patients for comprehensibility, usability and acceptance in qualitative think-aloud interviews and conducted a cross-sectional quantitative online survey to validate the questionnaire. People with suspected or confirmed relapsing-remitting MS and a recent relapse experience were eligible for inclusion. We checked normal distribution of the RKQ score and determined the item difficulty. Construct validity was analysed using correlational analysis., Results: The final RKQ consists of 10 items. After minor changes of the RKQ during pre-testing (n = 2), pilot testing (n = 10) confirmed the usability and acceptance of the instrument. The subsequent validation study (n = 203) resulted in a mean item difficulty of 0.44, ranging from 0.18 to 0.83. Seven items were particularly difficult and answered incorrectly by more than 50 % of participants. Construct validity of the RKQ was satisfactory. The RKQ score correlated only weakly with participants' degree of education (|r p |>0.1), years since diagnosis (|r p |>0.1), and the intention to receive corticosteroids (|r p |>0.1)., Conclusion: This study indicates the validity of the RKQ and proposes that the RKQ is a suitable instrument to assess relapse knowledge in people with MS participating in educational interventions., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Author CH has received research grants, speaker honoraria, and travel grants from Biogen, Celgene, Genzyme, Roche, and Merck. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) exhibits promising results for multiple sclerosis (MS) in the short term. We investigated the long-term outcome differences in disease progression and cognitive impairment after aHSCT and alemtuzumab treatment., Methods: 20 patients receiving aHSCT and 21 patients treated with alemtuzumab between 2007 and 2020 were included in this monocentric observational cohort study. The primary objective was to compare the outcome of both groups with regards to achieving No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA-3), defined by the absence of relapses, EDSS progression, and MRI activity. Secondary endpoints in the study included the assessment of neurocognitive functioning, quality of life (QoL), Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC), and EDSS improvement., Results: Baseline characteristics between both groups were comparable, except for a longer disease duration in the alemtuzumab group of 11.3 years compared to 5.4 years in aHSCT-treated patients (p = 0.002) and a longer mean follow-up time in the aHSCT cohort of 9.0 (range 2.8-15.7) years compared to 5.9 years (range 0.9-9.2) in alemtuzumab patients. NEDA-3 was more frequently observed in the aHSCT group with 75.0 % and 55.0 % at five and 10 years, respectively, than in the alemtuzumab group with only 40.0 % at five years (p = 0.012). Relapse free survival was higher in the aHSCT group (p < 0.001). None of the aHSCT-treated patients showed new T2-lesions six months after therapy initiation until the end of the observational period in contrast to 35.0 % of the alemtuzumab-treated patients showing new T2-lesions (95 %CI 14.2-98.9, p = 0.002). aHSCT-treated patients showed significantly improved cognitive performance in five out of 12 cognitive tests whereas alemtuzumab treated patients deteriorated in four out of 12 tests. Quality of life remained on a constant level for up to 10 years in patients receiving aHSCT with improved scores for the subscale fatigue (p = 0.013)., Conclusion: aHSCT seems to be superior to alemtuzumab in maintaining long-term NEDA-3 status, improving cognition and stabilizing quality of life for up to 10 years., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Receiving a multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis is a significant stressor. Therefore, highly individualised counselling is needed, especially in early MS. Modifiable risk factors (e.g. smoking and obesity) are gaining relevance in MS. Despite evidence for worse MS-related health outcomes, prevalence of adverse health behaviours, such as smoking and physical inactivity, is high across all MS stages. However, knowledge regarding health behaviours as well as their association with MS-related health outcomes among newly diagnosed PwMS in Germany is scarce. Currently, the efficacy of an interactive digital lifestyle management application intended to be used as an add-on to standard care among newly diagnosed PwMS in Germany is evaluated in an ongoing multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) ('POWER@MS1')., Objectives: To describe baseline disease characteristics and health behaviours of the POWER@MS1 cohort and investigate associations between MS characteristics, quality of life (QOL), health behaviours and intention to optimise health behaviour habits., Methods: This study included 234 persons with early MS from 20 study centres located across Germany who participate in the POWER@MS1 RCT. Participants were recruited by treating neurologists from different regions and health-care settings in Germany. Baseline data was obtained using paper-based questionnaires and a web-based healthy diet screener between July 2019 and end of March 2022 and analysed descriptively., Results: In this early MS cohort (mean disease duration 4 months), a screening tool showed severe symptoms of anxiety in 15 % of the participants. Better means for stress management appeared to be particularly relevant for the whole cohort. Moreover, 19 % were current smokers, 15 % were obese and 36 % were insufficiently physically active. On average, participants only moderately adhered to dietary guidelines for recommended intake of key food groups (e.g. vegetables, fruits and fatty marine fish). Higher EDSS scores were associated with approximately 20 % higher T2-lesion burden (rate ratio RR=1.2, p<0.001) and 13 % higher relapse rate (RR=1.13,p=0.02) per EDSS disability level. Moreover, a higher T2-lesion burden was associated with current smoking (RR=0.76, p=0.033), resulting in approximately 24 % less T2-lesions at disease onset among non-smokers. In addition, smoking was associated with unhealthier dietary habits according to lower diet scores (linear regression coefficient β=-1.27, p<0.001). Higher EDSS scores (β=0.19,p<0.001) and higher BMI (β=0.013,p=0.03) were associated with higher HAQUAMS (lower QOL). Further, lower diet scores (β=-0.044,p=0.039) were associated with lower QOL. Moreover, higher HAQUAMS (lower QOL) indicated a higher intention to optimise stress management (β=0.98,p<0.001), physical activity (β=0.74,p=0.046) and sleep behaviour (β=1.82,p<0.001). Further, higher intention to optimise stress management was accounted for by higher EDSS scores (β=0.39,p=0.004) and a higher number of T2-lesions (β=0.029,p=0.015) in this newly diagnosed MS cohort., Conclusion: Results indicate a clear need for modifications of health behaviours among newly diagnosed PwMS participating in POWER@MS1. Individualised psychological and health behaviour counselling appears to be an important factor in treatment, also for similar early MS cohorts and particularly in those who demonstrate a more severe disease in clinical and MRI metrics., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest CH has received research grants, speaker honoraria and travel grants from Biogen, Celgene, Genzyme, Merck and Roche; all outside of this work. HT has no personal pecuniary interests to disclose, other than being the Secretary General of the German MS Society, federal association, which receives funding from a range of public and corporate sponsors, recently including Bundesgesundheitsministerium (BMG), The German Innovation Fund (G-BA), The German MS Trust, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Viatris (former Mylan); none resulted in a conflict of interest. TF reports personnel fees from Bayer, BiosenseWebster, Boehringer Ingelheim, CSL Behring, Daiichi Sankyo, Enanta, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, Immunic, Janssen, LivaNova, Novartis, Relaxera, Roche, and Vifor; all outside this work. DB has received speaker honoraria and travel grants from Bayer, Novartis, Roche, Genzyme; all outside this work. AB has received consulting and/or speaker fees from Alexion, Biogen, Celgene, Horizon, Novartis, Roche and Sandoz/Hexal and his institution has received compensation for clinical trials from Alexion, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi Genzyme; all outside this work. KG has received compensation as investigator, advisor and speaker as well as travel fees from Abbvie, Almirall, Aristo, Bayer, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Genzyme, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck, Novartis and Roche; all outside this work. SM has received financial support for consulting activities from Roche; all outside this work. PO received research support as well as speaking fees and travel fees from Alexion, Bayer Health Care, Biogen, Janssen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, TEVA; all outside this work. HR has received speaker honoraria from Roche, MerckSerono, and Novartis and participated in advisory boards for Novartis, Teva, and Hexal; all outside this work. SSch has received research grants, speaker honoraria and travel compensations from BayerVital, Biogen, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Teva; all outside this work. AS received speaker honoraria from Bayer and Biogen, and participated in AdBoards for Merck Serono; all outside this work. KHS has received speaker honoraria or travel grants from Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck and Roche; all outside this work. CW has received institutional honoraria and/or grant support from Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Alexion, Janssen, Merck, Biogen, and Roche; all outside this work. All other authors have nothing to declare., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Since multiple sclerosis (MS) is often diagnosed in young women, pregnancy is a common topic for women with MS (wwMS). The study aimed to assess the measurement properties of two patient-reported outcome measures on motherhood choice in MS, and to explore the information and support needs of wwMS concerning motherhood., Methods: We conducted an anonymous web-based survey to validate the motherhood/pregnancy choice and worries questionnaire (MPWQ, 31 items plus up to 3 additional items) and the motherhood choice knowledge questionnaire (MCKQ, 16 items). We used mailing lists and social media for nationwide recruitment in Germany, and included women of childbearing age with relapsing-remitting MS, clinically isolated syndrome or suspected MS who were considering pregnancy or were pregnant. For the MPWQ, we assessed item difficulty, discriminatory power, and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha; CA). We analysed construct validity using the Leipzig Questionnaire of Motives to have a Child, the Decisional Conflict Scale, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the Pregnancy-Related Anxiety Questionnaire-revised 2. We studied the structural validity using exploratory factor analysis (EFA). The MCKQ was evaluated descriptively. We explored the information and support needs of wwMS on motherhood descriptively. We examined correlations between MCKQ, MPWQ and clinical characteristics and performed exploratory group comparisons considering the following binary variables: having children and being pregnant., Results: 325 wwMS started the survey; 232 wwMS met our inclusion criteria and were analysed. Their mean age was 30 years (SD 5). Most women had relapsing-remitting MS (n = 218; 94%), 186 (80%) had no children, and 38 (16%) were pregnant. Internal consistency was good for the worries subscale (CA>0.8), while it was unsatisfactory for the attitude and coping subscales (CA<0.7). The EFA did not support the three-scale structure (coping, attitude, and worries). Due to these findings, we decided to keep the worries scale without any subscale. The items from the coping scale and attitude scale could be assessed as additional descriptive items. Convergent and divergent construct validity of the MPWQ was satisfactory. 206 wwMS (89%) completed the MCKQ. On average, 9 of 16 (56%) items were answered correctly (range 2-15), and the questionnaire showed a good balance between easy and difficult items. Questions on immunotherapy, disease activity, and breastfeeding were the most challenging. WwMS were confident in getting pregnant and raising a child (n = 222; 96%). Most wwMS were worried about postpartum relapses (n = 200; 86%) and the long-term effects of pregnancy on disease evolution (n = 149; 64%). About half of the wwMS (n = 124; 54%) did not know where to find professional help and 127 (55%) had no strategies to cope with future impairments so that they could take care of a child., Conclusion: Our results support the suitability and acceptability of both questionnaires as potential patient-reported measures for assessment of knowledge and worries around motherhood/pregnancy in MS. The survey results highlight the need for evidence-based information on motherhood in MS to increase knowledge, reduce worries and support wwMS in making informed decisions., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest ACR has nothing to disclose. AG has nothing to disclose. AS has received advisory boards and speaker honoraria from Almirall, Merck, and Sanofi Genzyme. CH has received research funds from Genzyme, Roche, Merck, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. JP has nothing to disclose. KH reports research support and speaker honoraria from Biogen, Bayer Healthcare, Novartis Pharma, Teva, Sanofi Genzyme, Merck Serono, and Roche. LS has nothing to disclose. SK has nothing to disclose. SMG has received grants from Biogen and speaker honoraria from Hexal., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) particularly affects women between the age of 20 and 40. Therefore, pregnancy is often an important issue for women with MS (wwMS), but misunderstandings, misinformation, and uncertainties about MS and pregnancy are common. We developed and pilot-tested two questionnaires, one on knowledge (MCKQ), and one on attitudes, coping strategies and worries (MPWQ) of wwMS regarding pregnancy., Methods: This mixed-methods study followed the MRC framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions. Two questionnaires were developed based on an earlier questionnaire and a qualitative study, cognitively debriefed and pilot tested in a web-based survey. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis. The psychometric analysis included item difficulty and reliability (for both questionnaires), convergent validity assessment and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) (for MPWQ)., Results: The qualitative study (three focus groups and interviews with 15 wwMS overall and interviews with 4 experts) revealed several topics requiring evidence-based decision support. A multidisciplinary panel produced the 16-item MCKQ and the 39-item MPWQ. The cognitive debriefing of both questionnaires went smoothly. Of 128 wwMS who approached the survey, 95 (74%) completed the MCKQ and 89 (70%) the MPWQ. The mean age of wwMS was 36.7 years, 88% had a relapsing MS, and 32% had no children. Item difficulty, reliability and convergent validity were acceptable for both questionnaires. The EFA did not confirm the three-scale structure (attitude, worries and coping)., Conclusion: The developed questionnaires fill a gap in self-reported measures of knowledge (MCKQ) and attitudes, worries, and coping strategies (MPWQ) of wwMS regarding motherhood. Further refinement of the MPWQ and validation in a larger sample is warranted before its large-scale use., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: In a healthcare system which aims to empower the patient, self-management becomes increasingly important. In Multiple Sclerosis, an effective self-management is associated with various favorable health-related outcomes like improvement in quality of life, the reduction of depression and anxiety symptoms, and reduced healthcare costs. This study investigates the association between the Big Five personality traits and self-management including activity in self-help groups., Methods: People with MS were recruited via several paths within Germany (e.g. medical practices, social events and the German MS society). The final study sample consisted of 682 participants who answered a multidimensional questionnaire. This comprised the Big-Five-Inventory-10 for personality, the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ) for self-management competencies, questions for participation in self-help groups, and socio-demographic and clinical variables., Results: Multivariate regression analyses showed that personality could explain a greater amount of variance of self-management than socio-demographic and clinical variables. Neuroticism was the strongest predictor and correlated negatively with all heiQ-dimensions of self-management. In contrast, in logistic regression analysis none of the Big Five traits became significant in predicting the activity in self-help groups., Conclusion: As expected, personality plays an important role regarding self-management. Ideally, a time-saving personality assessment should be considered in routine clinical practice to identify patients at risk; however, at a minimum, personality traits should be considered in consultations with their neurologists. They may need help to understand the benefits of effective self-management and should receive support to improve their self-management skills and to reduce their neuroticism to lower the risk of secondary complications., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system of potential autoimmune origin that is frequently associated with neuropsychiatric symptoms and cognitive deficits, as well as with fatigue, stress and psychosocial burden. In the present controlled multi-centre trial we investigated whether two specific neuropsychological interventions (1. metacognitive training (MaTiMS); 2. computerized working memory training (BrainStim) in combination with MaTiMS) applied as add-on therapies to real life standard rehabilitation lead to increased benefit in self-perceived cognitive deficits (the primary outcome) in MS patients compared to standard rehab., Methods: 288 adult persons in three German rehab centers with a confirmed diagnosis of MS were sequentially allocated to one of the three intervention groups. 249 (87%) participants completed the post assessment and 187 (63%) the online survey after 12 months. Perceived cognitive deficits, mood, fatigue, coping, and activity were evaluated by self-reports and neuropsychological tests at baseline and 4 weeks postintervention. All self-reports were additionally administered digitally at three, six, and twelve months from baseline., Results: We could not show differential effects on the primary outcome between the intervention groups and the control group (p=.369, p=.934). Immediately after each intervention we could show beneficial time effects in all three groups on self-perceived cognitive deficits as well as on most of the other outcomes. The reported effects were however not sustained at 6 months follow-up., Conclusions: Our findings could not show an additional effect of specific cognitive training on cognitive deficit perception in MS. However, findings indicate that MS rehabilitation may improve patient reported outcomes in the short term. They also underline the need for concepts to maintain rehabilitation gains when patients return back home., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Immune treatments of multiple sclerosis (MS) can be classified in first-line and second-line approaches. While in both treatment efficacy is often not easy to assess in the short-term, treatment and illness beliefs may differ in first-line and second-line treated patients. The current study aimed to assess differential beliefs about medicine and illness perception between these groups based on the hypothesis that they are closely connected to adherence behaviour., Methods: An online survey through the website of the German MS Society was performed investigating beliefs about immune treatments as well as the patients' illness perceptions with validated questionnaires. Demographic factors, disability and self-reported adherence rates were studied as moderator variables., Results: In total, 630 patients participated. Data of 433 first-line treated and 192 second-line treated patients with MS (PwMS) were analysed. Necessity beliefs and also concerns beliefs were significantly higher in second-line treated PwMS (MANCOVA p =.001 and p =.006) and generally in patients with higher disability, while illness perception did not differ between groups. Self-assessed adherence rates were around 70% for oral treatments and injectables irrespective of first-line or second-line. Nonadherence was below 5% for infusion treatments. However, most patients reported only single omissions., Conclusion: The current study reveals differential behavioural attitudes between first-line versus second-line-treated PwMS. However, follow-up studies are needed to further unravel the relationship between behavioural attitudes and treatment adherence., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest GEAP and BU received speaker honoraria and project funding from Genzyme Sanofi. CH received speaker honoraria and project funding from Genzyme Sanofi, Roche, Merck, Biogen. AB received funding from Roche. All remaining authors have no conflict of interest to declare. This study was supported by a grant from Sanofi Genzyme Pharma., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Little is known on how to measure patient-relevant benefit of relapse treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). The objective of this study was to develop and validate a new method for monitoring recovery from MS relapses and patient-relevant treatment benefits., Methods: A 27-item questionnaire was developed using a multi-step approach comprising open item collection, multidisciplinary expert panel and cognitive debriefing. It was evaluated regarding psychometric properties and feasibility in a longitudinal validation study with 100 patients with MS undergoing relapse treatment. Construct validity was tested by correlations with patient and physician global impressions of change as well as disease-specific and generic health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures., Results: Results of the feasibility survey indicated high patient acceptance. Reliability was high (Cronbach's α = 0.90). While the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) was not sensitive to change, Patient Benefit Index for Multiple Sclerosis (PBI-MS) showed a high correlation cross-sectionally with patient global impression of change (PaGIC) (r = 0.60, p < 0.001). Significant moderate to high correlations were found with change in generic HRQoL (r = 0.55-0.61, p < 0.001) and lower correlations with change in disease-specific HRQoL (r = -0.36, p < 0.01)., Conclusion: The PBI-MS is a reliable and valid instrument for ascertaining patient-relevant benefits of acute relapse treatment; it appears suited for use in routine care and in clinical or health care studies., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Fingolimod can lead to increased risk of cardiac events such as bradycardia or atrioventricular (AV) block., Objective: Evaluate acute and long-term effects of fingolimod on heart rhythm (HR), heart rate variability (HRV) and development of AV-blocks., Methods: In 64 patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis Holter ECG monitoring (HEM) and HRV analysis were performed 24h before, six h during and 72h after initiation of fingolimod. We additionally analyzed a 24h HEM after a follow up of ≥ three months., Results: Heart rate (HR) decreased significantly (p < 0.001) under fingolimod treatment with nadir at five hours after starting and maintained decreased for 72h. Five (7.8%) patients suffered from new-onset AV-block requiring cessation of treatment. In four of five patients (80%), the AV-block could only be documented in the 72h-HEM with a median time of occurrence at 14h. The mean heart rate was still significant lower after a mean follow up time of 14.1 ± 9.6 months (85.0 ± 9.8 vs. 75.3 ± 16.2 bpm; p = 0.002) in comparison to baseline., Conclusion: The treatment with fingolimod leads to an increase of vagal activation which persists even after 14 months of treatment. These changes did not return to baseline levels on treatment with fingolimod. Based on our data an additional at least 24h hour-HEM after the initiation of fingolimod therapy should be considered., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)