Search

Erratum to: “The Movement Disorder Society Nonmotor Rating Scale: Initial Validation Study”, by Ray Chaudhuri et al. (Mov Disord 2020; 35: 116-133). Mov Disord. 2020 Jan;35(10):116-133. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.28266 Background: The Movement Disorder Society-sponsored Nonmotor Rating Scale is an update of the existing Parkinson's disease Nonmotor Symptoms Scale modified to address some limitations in Nonmotor Symptoms Scale scoring, structure, and symptom coverage. Methods: PD patients were recruited from movement disorder centers in an international, multicenter study. The Movement Disorder Society Nonmotor Rating Scale, consisting of 13 domains plus a subscale for nonmotor fluctuations, was rater administered, along with the Nonmotor Symptoms Scale and other clinical assessments. Standard reliability and validity testing were conducted. Results: Four hundred and two PD patients were recruited (mean age ± standard deviation, 67.42 ± 9.96 years; mean age at PD onset ± standard deviation, 59.27 ± 10.67 years; median Hoehn and Yahr stage 2 (interquartile range 2-3). Data quality was satisfactory for all Movement Disorder Society Nonmotor Rating Scale domains except sexual (6.7% missing data). There were no floor or ceiling effects for the Movement Disorder Society Nonmotor Rating Scale and nonmotor fluctuations total score; domains had no ceiling effects, but some floor effects (13.5%-83.5%). The Movement Disorder Society Nonmotor Rating Scale and nonmotor fluctuations total score internal consistency were acceptable (average Cronbach's alpha, 0.66 and 0.84, respectively); interrater reliability was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient, >0.95); for test-retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.84 for the Movement Disorder Society Nonmotor Rating Scale and 0.70 for Movement Disorder Society nonmotor fluctuations total score, and precision was excellent for the Movement Disorder Society Nonmotor Rating Scale (standard error of measurement, 25.30) and fair for nonmotor fluctuations (standard error of measurement, 7.06). Correlations between Movement Disorder Society Nonmotor Rating Scale score and the corresponding Nonmotor Symptoms Scale and Movement Disorder Society UPDRS scores were high. There were no significant sex or age effects. The Movement Disorder Society Nonmotor Rating Scale score increased with increasing PD duration, disease severity, and PD medication dose (all P

Fil: Pérez Lloret, Santiago. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Pérez Lloret, Santiago. Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas; Argentina Fil: Pérez Lloret. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina; Argentina Fil: Warrenburg, Bart van de. Radboud University Medical Center. Center of Expertise for Parkinson and Movement Disorders. Department of Neurology. 4Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior; Países Bajos Fil: Rossi, Malco. Raul Carrea Institute for Neurological Research. Movement Disorders Section; Argentina Fil: Rodríguez-Blázquez, Carmen. Institute of Health Carlos III and CIBERNED. National Centre of Epidemiology; España Fil: Zesiewicz, Theresa. University of South Florida. Department of Neurology; Estados Unidos Fil: Saute, Jonas A. M. Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre; Brasil Fil: Saute, Jonas A. M. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; Brasil Fil: Durr, Alexandra. 12Sorbonne Université. Institut du Cerveau-Paris Brain Institute; Francia Fil: Durr, Alexandra. University Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière; Francia Fil: Nishizawa, Masatoyo. Niigata University. Brain Research Institute; Japón Fil: Martinez-Martin, Pablo. Carlos III Institute of Health. Center for Networked Biomedical Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases; España Fil: Stebbins, Glenn T. Rush University Medical Center. Department of Neurological Sciences; Estados Unidos Fil: Schrag, Anette. Royal Free Campus. UCL Institute of Neurology. Department of Clinical Neurosciences; Reino Unido Fil: Skorvanek, Matej. P. J. Safarik University. Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine; Eslovaquia Fil: Skorvanek, Matej. University Hospital L. Pasteur. Department of Neurology; Eslovaquia Background: We assessed the clinimetric properties of ataxia rating scales and functional tests, and made recommendations regarding their use. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify the instruments used to rate ataxia symptoms. The identified rating scales and functional ability tests were reviewed and ranked by the panel as “recommended,” “suggested,” or “listed” for the assessment of patients with discrete cerebellar disorders, using previously established criteria. Results: We reviewed 14 instruments (9 rating scales and 5 functional tests). “Recommended” rating scales for the assessment of symptoms severity were: for Friedreich’s ataxia, the Friedreich’s Ataxia Rating Scale, the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS), and the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA); for spinocerebellar ataxias, ICARS and SARA; for ataxia telangiectasia: ICARS and SARA; for brain tumors, SARA; for congenital disorder of glycosylation-phosphomannomutase-2 deficiency, ICARS; for cerebellar symptoms in multiple sclerosis, ICARS; for cerebellar symptoms in multiple system atrophy: Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale and ICARS; and for fragile X–associated tremor ataxia syndrome, ICARS. “Recommended” functional tests were: for Friedreich’s ataxia, Ataxia Functional Composite Score and Composite Cerebellar Functional Severity Score; and for spinocerebellar ataxias, Ataxia Functional Composite Score, Composite Cerebellar Functional Severity Score, and SCA Functional Index.

Background: The primary validation of the Movement Disorder Society Non-Motor Rating Scale was recently published, but 2 important structural analyses were not included. The objective of this study was to examine the structural characteristics of the Movement Disorder Society Non-Motor Rating Scale by factor and cluster analyses. Methods: Data came from the validation study, an international multicenter cross-sectional study of 402 Parkinson's disease patients. Demographic and clinical data, the Movement Disorder Society Non-Motor Rating Scale, and Hoehn and Yahr staging were used. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and nonhierarchical cluster analysis were performed. Results: The exploratory factor analysis showed that all 13 domains of the Movement Disorder Society Non-Motor Rating Scale, except 1, and the Non-Motor Fluctuations subscale performed as unidimensional (variance explained: 0.36, sleep and wakefulness; -0.82, orthostatic hypotension). The confirmatory factor analysis could be carried out in 9 domains and showed that 6 of them and the Non-Motor Fluctuations subscale adjusted to the model satisfactorily according to the root mean square error of approximation. Furthermore, all domains had comparative fit index values >0.95, except depression and pain (both, 0.94) and sleep and wakefulness (0.90). The Non-Motor Fluctuations subscale showed satisfactory root mean square error of approximation (0.07), but a low comparative fit index value (0.91). A 5-cluster solution, correctly classifying 96% of the cases, was found. Conclusions: Overall, most subscales of the Movement Disorder Society Non-Motor Rating Scale are unidimensional, and although each subscale is distinct in terms of content covered, factors and clusters that are of clinical relevance are discernible and contribute to our understanding of possible nonmotor subtypes in Parkinson's disease. The project was supported by a two-stage academic peer-reviewed grant from the International Parkinson’s and Movement Disorder’s Society (IPMDS) as well as Clinical Research Network (CRN), London South and London North Thames, National Institute of Health Research (for the UK sites). Sí

Objective The recent advances in technology are opening a new opportunity to remotely evaluate motor features in people with Parkinson's disease (PD). We hypothesized that typing on an electronic device, a habitual behavior facilitated by the nigrostriatal dopaminergic pathway, could allow for objectively and nonobtrusively monitoring parkinsonian features and response to medication in an at-home setting. Methods We enrolled 31 participants recently diagnosed with PD who were due to start dopaminergic treatment and 30 age-matched controls. We remotely monitored their typing pattern during a 6-month (24 weeks) follow-up period before and while dopaminergic medications were being titrated. The typing data were used to develop a novel algorithm based on recursive neural networks and detect participants' responses to medication. The latter were defined by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-III (UPDRS-III) minimal clinically important difference. Furthermore, we tested the accuracy of the algorithm to predict the final response to medication as early as 21 weeks prior to the final 6-month clinical outcome. Results The score on the novel algorithm based on recursive neural networks had an overall moderate kappa agreement and fair area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve with the time-coincident UPDRS-III minimal clinically important difference. The participants classified as responders at the final visit (based on the UPDRS-III minimal clinically important difference) had higher scores on the novel algorithm based on recursive neural networks when compared with the participants with stable UPDRS-III, from the third week of the study onward. Conclusions This preliminary study suggests that remotely gathered unsupervised typing data allows for the accurate detection and prediction of drug response in PD. © 2019 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Parkinson's disease is a progressive, disabling neurodegenerative disorder associated with significant economic burden for patients and caregivers. The objective of this study was to compare the direct and indirect economic burden of Parkinson's patients' caregivers with demographically matched controls in the United States, in the 5 years after first diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. Policyholders (18-64 years old) linked to a Parkinson's disease patient (≥2 diagnoses of Parkinson's disease; first diagnosis is the index date) from January 1, 1998 to March 31, 2014, were selected from a private-insurer claims database and categorized as Parkinson's caregivers. Eligible Parkinson's caregivers were matched 1:5 to policyholders with a non-Parkinson's dependent (controls). Multivariable regression adjusted for baseline characteristics estimated direct costs (all-cause insurer cost [medical and prescription] and comorbidity-related medical costs; patient out-of-pocket costs) and indirect costs (disability and medically related absenteeism costs). Income progression was also compared between cohorts. A total of 1211 eligible Parkinson's caregivers (mean age, 56 years; 54% female) were matched to 6055 controls. In adjusted analyses, Parkinson's caregivers incurred significantly higher year 1 total all-cause insurer costs ($8999 vs $7117) and medical costs ($7081 vs $5568) (both P < 0.01) and higher prescription costs (range for years 1-5, $2506-2573 vs $1405-$1687) and total out-of-pocket costs ($1259-1585 vs $902-$1192) in years 1-5 (all P < 0.01). Parkinson's caregivers had significantly higher adjusted indirect costs in years 1-3 (range for years 1-3, $2054-$2464 vs $1681-$1857; all P < 0.05) and higher cumulative income loss over 5 years ($5967 vs $2634 by year 5; P for interaction = 0.03). Parkinson's caregivers exhibited higher direct and indirect costs and greater income loss compared with matched controls. © 2018 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society © 2018 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. This study and manuscript were funded by AbbVie. The design, study conduct, and financial support for the study were provided by AbbVie. AbbVie participated in the study design, research, interpretation of data, writ- ing, reviewing, and approving the manuscript. Sí

Background: Several clinician, informant, and self-report instruments for tics and associated phenomena have been developed that differ in construct, comprehensiveness, and ease of administration. Objective: A Movement Disorders Society subcommittee aimed to rate psychometric quality of severity and screening instruments for tics and related sensory phenomena. Methods: Following the methodology adopted by previous Movement Disorders Society subcommittee papers, a review of severity and screening instruments for tics was completed, applying a classification as “recommended,” “suggested,” or “listed” to each instrument. Results: A total of 5 severity scales (Yale Global Tic Severity Scale, Tourette Syndrome Clinical Global Impression, Tourette's Disorder Scale, Shapiro Tourette syndrome Severity Scale, Premonitory Urges for Tics Scale) were “recommended,” and 6 (Rush Video-Based Tic Rating Scale, Motor tic, Obsessions and compulsions, Vocal tic Evaluation Survey, Tourette Syndrome Global Scale, Global Tic Rating Scale, Parent Tic Questionnaire, Tourette Syndrome Symptom List) were “suggested.” A total of 2 screening instruments (Motor tic, Obsession and compulsions, Vocal tic Evaluation Survey and Autism-Tics, Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Other Comorbidities Inventory) were “recommended,” whereas 2 others (Apter 4-questions screening and Proxy Report Questionnaire for Parents and Teachers) were “suggested.” Conclusions: Our review does not support the need for developing new tic severity or screening instruments. Potential objectives of future research include developing a rating instrument targeting the full spectrum of tic-related abnormal behaviors, assessing/screening malignant forms of tic disorders, and developing patient-reported outcome measures. © 2017 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

The compromise of quality of life in Huntington's disease is a major issue, both for individuals with the disease as well as for their caregivers. The International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society commissioned a review of the use and clinimetric validation status of measures used in Huntington's disease to assess aspects related with quality of life and to make recommendations on their use following standardized criteria. We included both patient‐centered measures (patient health‐related quality‐of‐life measures) and caregiver‐centered measures (caregiver quality‐of‐life measures). After conducting a systematic literature search, we included 12 measures of patient health‐related quality of life and 2 measures of caregiver quality of life. Regarding patient‐centered measures, the Medical Outcomes Study 36‐Item Short‐Form Health Survey is “recommended” as a generic assessment of health‐related quality of life in patients with Huntington's disease. The 12‐Item Short Form Health Survey, the Sickness Impact Profile, the 12‐item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, and the Huntington's Disease Health‐Related Quality of Life questionnaire are “suggested.” No caregiver‐centered quality‐of‐life measure obtained a “recommended” status. The Alzheimer's Carer's Quality of Life Inventory and the Huntington's Disease Quality of Life Battery for Carers are “suggested.” Recognizing that the assessment of patient health‐related quality of life can be challenging in Huntington's disease, as patients may lack insight and there is insufficient clinimetric testing of these scales, the committee concluded that further validation of currently available health‐related quality‐of‐life measures should be undertaken, namely, those Huntington's disease–specific health‐related quality‐of‐life measures that have recently been reported and used.

Background The objective of this study was to investigate 24-month of effects of bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) on nonmotor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD). Methods In this prospective, observational, multicenter, international study including 67 PD patients undergoing bilateral STN-DBS, we examined the Non-motor Symptom Scale, Non-Motor Symptoms Questionnaire, Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-8, Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease-motor examination, -activities of daily living, and -complications, and levodopa-equivalent daily dose preoperatively and at 5 and 24-month of follow-up. After checking distribution normality, longitudinal outcome changes were investigated with Friedman tests or repeated-measures analysis of variance and Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons using multiple tests. Post hoc, Wilcoxon signed rank t tests were computed to compare visits. The strength of clinical responses was analyzed using effect size. Explorative Spearman correlations of change scores from baseline to 24-month follow-up were calculated for all outcomes. Results The Non-motor Symptom Scale and all other outcome parameters significantly improved from baseline to the 5-month follow-up. From 5 to 24-month, partial decrements in these gains were found. Nonetheless, comparing baseline with 24-month follow-up, significant improvements were observed for the Non-motor Symptom Scale (small effect), Scales for Outcomes in PD-motor examination showed a moderate effect, and Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease-complications and levodopa-equivalent daily dose showed large effects. Non-motor Symptom Scale change scores from baseline to 24-month follow-up correlated significantly with Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-8, Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease-activities of daily living, and -motor complications change scores. Conclusions This study provides evidence of beneficial effects of bilateral STN-DBS on nonmotor symptoms at 24-month follow-up. The extent of nonmotor symptom improvement was directly proportionate to improvements in quality of life, activities of daily living, and motor complications. This study underlines the importance of nonmotor symptoms for holistic assessments of DBS outcomes. © 2018 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Cognitive impairment is one of the main features of Huntington's disease and is present across the disease spectrum. As part of the International Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorder Society-sponsored project to review all clinical rating scales used in Huntington's disease, a systematic review of the literature was performed to identify cognitive scales used in Huntington's disease and make recommendations for their use. A total of 17 cognitive scales were identified and evaluated. None of the scales met criteria for a "recommended" status. For assessing severity of cognitive dysfunction, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment was "recommended with caveats." The UHDRS Cognitive Assessment, the UHDRS-For Advanced Patients cognitive section, the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale, the Frontal Assessment Battery, the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale, the Mini-Mental State Examination, and the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status were "suggested" for evaluating severity of cognitive impairment. The MoCA was "suggested" as a screening tool for cognitive impairment. The major challenge in the assessment of cognition in Huntington's disease is the lack of a formal definition of dementia and/or mild cognitive impairment in this disease. The committee concluded that there is a need to further validate currently available cognitive scales in Huntington's disease, but that it is premature to recommend the development of new scales. Recently developed Huntington's disease-specific scales, such as the Huntington's Disease-Cognitive Assessment Battery, hold promise but require the completion of more comprehensive clinimetric development. © 2017 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.