Search

The discovery of robust antidepressant actions exerted by the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antagonist (R,S)-ketamine has been a crucial breakthrough in mood disorder research. (R,S)-ketamine is a racemic mixture of equal amounts of (R)-ketamine (arketamine) and (S)-ketamine (esketamine). In 2019, an esketamine nasal spray from Johnson & Johnson was approved in the United States of America and Europe for treatment-resistant depression. However, an increasing number of preclinical studies show that arketamine has greater potency and longer-lasting antidepressant-like effects than esketamine in rodents, despite the lower binding affinity of arketamine for the NMDAR. In clinical trials, non-ketamine NMDAR-related compounds did not exhibit ketamine-like robust antidepressant actions in patients with depression, despite these compounds showing antidepressant-like effects in rodents. Thus, the rodent data do not necessarily translate to humans due to the complexity of human psychiatric disorders. Collectively, the available studies indicate that it is unlikely that NMDAR plays a major role in the antidepressant action of (R,S)-ketamine and its enantiomers, although the precise molecular mechanisms underlying antidepressant actions of (R,S)-ketamine and its enantiomers remain unclear. In this paper, we review recent findings on the molecular mechanisms underlying the antidepressant actions of (R,S)-ketamine and its potent enantiomer arketamine. Furthermore, we discuss the possible role of the brain–gut–microbiota axis and brain–spleen axis in stress-related psychiatric disorders and in the antidepressant-like action of arketamine. Finally, we discuss the potential of arketamine as a treatment for cognitive impairment in psychiatric disorders, Parkinson’s disease, osteoporosis, inflammatory bowel diseases, and stroke.

Major depressive disorder (MDD) has until recently been conceptualized as an episodic disorder associated with 'chemical imbalances' but no permanent brain changes. Evidence has emerged in the past decade that MDD is associated with small hippocampal volumes. This paper reviews the clinical and biological correlates of small hippocampal volumes based on literature searches of PubMed and EMBASE and discusses the ways in which these data force a re-conceptualization of MDD. Preclinical data describe the molecular and cellular effects of chronic stress and antidepressant treatment on the hippocampus, providing plausible mechanisms through which MDD might be associated with small hippocampal volumes. Small hippocampal volumes are associated with poor clinical outcome and may be a mechanism through which MDD appears to be a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease. The pathways through which stress may be linked to MDD, the emergence of chronicity or treatment resistance in MDD and the association between MDD and memory problems may be at least partially understood by dissecting the association with depression and changes in the hippocampus. MDD must be re-conceived as a complex illness, associated with persistent morphological brain changes that are detectable before illness onset and which may be modified by clinical and treatment variables.