Search

Type III lipid-based formulations (LBFs) combine poorly water-soluble drugs with oils, surfactants, and cosolvents to deliver the drugs into the systemic circulation. However, the solubility of the drug can be influenced by the colloidal phases formed in the gastrointestinal tract as the formulation is dispersed and makes contact with bile and other materials present within the GI tract. Thus, an understanding of the phase behavior of LBFs in the gut is critical for designing efficient LBFs. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation is a powerful tool for the study of colloidal systems. In this study, we modeled the internal structures of five type III LBFs of loratadine containing poly(ethylene oxide) nonionic surfactants polysorbate 80 and polyoxyl hydrogenated castor oil (Kolliphor RH40) using long-timescale MD simulations (0.4-1.7 μs). We also conducted experimental investigations (dilution of formulations with water) including commercial Claritin liquid softgel capsules. The simulations show that LBFs form continuous phase, water-swollen reverse micelles, and bicontinuous and phase-separated systems at different dilutions, which correlate with the experimental observations. This study supports the use of MD simulation as a predictive tool to determine the fate of LBFs composed of medium-chain lipids, polyethylene oxide surfactants, and polymers.

The scientific rationale for selection of the surfactant type during oral formulation development requires an in-depth understanding of the interplay between surfactant characteristics and biopharmaceutical factors. Currently, however, there is a lack of comprehensive knowledge of how surfactant properties, such as hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB), digestibility, and fatty acid (FA) chain length, translate into in vivo performance. In the present study, the relationship between surfactant properties, in vitro characteristics, and in vivo bioavailability was systematically evaluated. An in vitro lipolysis model was used to study the digestibility of a variety of nonionic surfactants. Eight surfactants and one surfactant mixture were selected for further analysis using the model poorly water-soluble drug nilotinib. In vitro lipolysis of all nilotinib formulations was performed, followed by an in vivo pharmacokinetic evaluation in rats. The in vitro lipolysis studies showed that medium-chain FA-based surfactants were more readily digested compared to long-chain surfactants. The in vivo study demonstrated that a Tween 20 formulation significantly enhanced the absolute bioavailability of nilotinib up to 5.2-fold relative to an aqueous suspension. In general, surfactants that were highly digestible in vitro tended to display higher bioavailability of nilotinib in vivo . The bioavailability may additionally be related to the FA chain length of digestible surfactants with an improved exposure in the case of medium-chain FA-based surfactants. There was no apparent relationship between the HLB value of surfactants and the in vivo bioavailability of nilotinib. The impact of this study's findings suggests that when designing surfactant-based formulations to enhance oral bioavailability of the poorly water-soluble drug nilotinib, highly digestible, medium chain-based surfactants are preferred. Additionally, for low-permeability drugs such as nilotinib, which is subject to efflux by intestinal P-glycoprotein, the biopharmaceutical effects of surfactants merit further consideration.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of glyceryl behenate as a plasticizer and release modifier in solid dispersion systems containing itraconazole and carbamazepine. Amorphous solid dispersions of high molecular weight polyvinylpyrrolidone were prepared by hot-melt extrusion, the processing of which was improved by the inclusion of glyceryl behenate. Dispersions were milled and subsequently compressed into tablets. Solid dispersions were also prepared by KinetiSol Dispersing, which allowed for the manufacture of monolithic tablets of the same composition and shape as compressed tablets. Tablets without glyceryl behenate and all compressed tablets were observed to have an incomplete release profile likely due to drug crystallization within the tablet as this occurred at conditions in which dissolution concentrations were below saturation. Monolithic tablets formulated to be more hydrophobic, by including glyceryl behenate, allowed for sustained release below and above saturation conditions.

The LFCS Consortium was established to develop standardized in vitro tests for lipid-based formulations (LBFs) and to examine the utility of these tests to probe the fundamental mechanisms that underlie LBF performance. In this publication, the impact of bile salt (sodium taurodeoxycholate, NaTDC) concentration and drug loading on the ability of a range of representative LBFs to generate and sustain drug solubilization and supersaturation during in vitro digestion testing has been explored and a common driver of the potential for drug precipitation identified. Danazol was used as a model poorly water-soluble drug throughout. In general, increasing NaTDC concentrations increased the digestion of the most lipophilic LBFs and promoted lipid (and drug) trafficking from poorly dispersed oil phases to the aqueous colloidal phase (AP(DIGEST)). High NaTDC concentrations showed some capacity to reduce drug precipitation, although, at NaTDC concentrations ≥3 mM, NaTDC effects on either digestion or drug solubilization were modest. In contrast, increasing drug load had a marked impact on drug solubilization. For LBFs containing long-chain lipids, drug precipitation was limited even at drug loads approaching saturation in the formulation and concentrations of solubilized drug in AP(DIGEST) increased with increased drug load. For LBFs containing medium-chain lipids, however, significant precipitation was evident, especially at higher drug loads. Across all formulations a remarkably consistent trend emerged such that the likelihood of precipitation was almost entirely dependent on the maximum supersaturation ratio (SR(M)) attained on initiation of digestion. SR(M) defines the supersaturation "pressure" in the system and is calculated from the maximum attainable concentration in the AP(DIGEST) (assuming zero precipitation), divided by the solubility of the drug in the colloidal phases formed post digestion. For LBFs where phase separation of oil phases did not occur, a threshold value for SR(M) was evident, regardless of formulation composition and drug solubilization reduced markedly above SR(M) > 2.5. The threshold SR(M) may prove to be an effective tool in discriminating between LBFs based on performance.