Search

Scope Allergies to lipid transfer proteins involve severe adverse reactions; thus, effective and sustainable therapies are desired. Previous attempts disrupting disulfide bonds failed to maintain immunogenicity; thus, the aim is to design novel hypoallergenic Pru p 3 variants and evaluate the applicability for treatment of peach allergy. Methods and results Pru p 3 proline variant (PV) designed using in silico mutagenesis, cysteine variant (CV), and wild‐type Pru p 3 (WT) are purified from Escherichia coli. Variants display homogenous and stable protein conformations with an altered secondary structure in circular dichroism. PV shows enhanced long‐term storage capacities compared to CV similar to the highly stable WT. Using sera of 33 peach allergic patients, IgE‐binding activity is reduced by 97% (PV) and 71% (CV) compared to WT. Both molecules show strong hypoallergenicity in Pru p 3 ImmunoCAP cross‐inhibition and histamine release assays. Immunogenicity of PV is demonstrated with a phosphate‐based adjuvant formulation in a mouse model. Conclusions An in silico approach is used to generate a PV without targeting disulfide bonds, T cell epitopes, or previously reported IgE epitopes of Pru p 3. PV is strongly hypoallergenic while structurally stable and immunogenic, thus representing a promising candidate for peach allergen immunotherapy., Engineering of the lipid transfer protein Pru p 3 from peach results in the generation of stable protein fold variants. These molecules demonstrate very low allergenic potency opposed to the wild‐type allergen. Proline variant presents enhanced integrity and elicits an immune response in a mouse model, thus representing a candidate molecule for allergen immunotherapy of peach allergic patients.

A lipid transfer protein (LTP, Cor a 8) together with the 11S (Cor a 9) and 7S seed storage globulins (Cor a 11) are major food allergens present in hazelnut. Methods are described for their purification and characterisation using in-gel tryptic digestion mass spectrometry to confirm their identities and circular dichroism and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopies to demonstrate that they are authentically folded. Preliminary immunochemical studies have also confirmed that the purified preparations retain their immunological properties in terms of immunoglobulin E binding, determined by immunoblotting using serum from hazelnut allergic patients. These preparations form a basis for development of improved methods of diagnosis of food allergy based on the concept of component-resolved diagnosis.

Standardized allergen extracts are needed for diagnosis and therapy purposes. For grapes, standardization is hampered by low protein and high tannin and pectin concentrations. The aim of the current study was to develop an optimized method for the extraction of grape proteins and possibly extend this to other fruits. Several existing or modified extraction methods were compared by means of protein concentration determination, SDS-PAGE, immunoblotting and radioallergosorbent test (RAST). An optimized extraction protocol was obtained in which we combined a high concentration of plant tissue, a concentrated, enriched and neutral buffer able to remove sugars and keep proteins soluble and a bivalent buffer for pectin removal. Both the quantitative (protein concentration) and qualitative parameters (SDS-PAGE protein patterns and IgE reactivity) were compared to standard protocols and commercial extracts used as diagnostic tools in the clinical practice. This method proved to be the most efficient mainly compared to the standard Björksten protocol in extracting the low molecular weight proteins, including the major grape allergen (lipid transfer protein, Vit v 1). It proved to be an easy, low cost and reproducible method proposed to prepare grape extracts that could replace the commercially available ones, used for diagnosis and possibly extend the method to other fruits especially in extracting LTPs., Vassilopoulou was supported through the IFR Marie Curie Training Site Fellowship (QLK1-CT-2000-60030) and an Iraklitos fellowship for PhD students (Ministry of Greece for Education and Religions E.P.E.A.E.K II KA 70/3/7148). C. Mills and N. Rigby were funded by the BBSRC competitive strategic grant to IFR. L. Zuidmeer and R. van Ree were (partly) funded by a grant from the EC: SAFE QLK1-CT-2000-01394.