Search

The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the education of children around the world, forcing a large proportion of teaching to be carried out remotely. The implications of this disruption have yet to be fully elucidated, but initial assessments suggest that COVID-19-related school closures and reliance on virtual learning may have a long-term negative impact on educational attainment and future earnings as well as life expectancy of children in the United States. Among children with neurodegenerative disorders, such as neuronopathic mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS disorders), the effects of the pandemic are likely to be even greater. We aim to shine a spotlight on the impact of COVID-19 on the education, treatment and general wellbeing of children and families affected by MPS disorders by highlighting the important role that educators and therapists play in supporting the neurocognitive function and quality of life of children with neuronopathic MPS disorders. This article will serve as a resource that caregivers, educators, clinicians and therapists can use when considering how best to advocate for children with neuronopathic MPS disorders in circumstances where in-school teaching or in-clinic treatment is compromised or not possible. Given that the current pandemic is likely to have a prolonged course and impact and that similar epidemics and pandemics are a near certainty in the future, it is essential that steps are taken to support the learning and care of children with neuronopathic MPS disorders. We must prioritize strategies to safely resume this fragile community's access to in-person education and supportive care, and to address gaps that have emerged during prolonged pauses in access, whenever possible.

Background Infantile gangliosidoses include GM1 gangliosidosis and GM2 gangliosidosis (Tay-Sachs disease, Sandhoff disease). To date, natural history studies in infantile GM2 (iGM2) have been retrospective and conducted through surveys. Compared to iGM2, there is even less natural history information available on infantile GM1 disease (iGM1). There are no approved treatments for infantile gangliosidoses. Substrate reduction therapy using miglustat has been tried, but is limited by gastrointestinal side effects. Development of effective treatments will require identification of meaningful outcomes in the setting of rapidly progressive and fatal diseases. Objectives This study aimed to establish a timeline of clinical changes occurring in infantile gangliosidoses, prospectively, to: 1) characterize the natural history of these diseases; 2) improve planning of clinical care; and 3) identify meaningful future treatment outcome measures. Methods Patients were evaluated prospectively through ongoing clinical care. Results Twenty-three patients were evaluated: 8 infantile GM1, 9 infantile Tay-Sachs disease, 6 infantile Sandhoff disease. Common patterns of clinical change included: hypotonia before 6 months of age; severe motor skill impairment within first year of life; seizures; dysphagia and feeding-tube placement before 18 months of age. Neurodevelopmental testing scores reached the floor of the testing scale by 20 to 28 months of age. Vertebral beaking, kyphosis, and scoliosis were unique to patients with infantile GM1. Chest physiotherapy was associated with increased survival in iGM1 (p = 0.0056). Miglustat combined with a low-carbohydrate ketogenic diet (the Syner-G regimen) in patients who received a feeding-tube was associated with increased survival in infantile GM1 (p = 0.025). Conclusions This is the first prospective study of the natural history of infantile gangliosidoses and the very first natural history of infantile GM1. The homogeneity of the infantile gangliosidoses phenotype as demonstrated by the clinical events timeline in this study provides promising secondary outcome measure candidates. This study indicates that overall survival is a meaningful primary outcome measure for future clinical trials due to reliable timing and early occurrence of this event. Combination therapy approaches, instead of monotherapy approaches, will likely be the best way to optimize clinical outcomes. Combination therapy approaches include palliative therapies (e.g., chest physiotherapy) along with treatments that address the underlying disease pathology (e.g. miglustat or future gene therapies).