1. Drug-survival profiling of second-line biologic therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: Choice of another tumour necrosis factor inhibitor or a biologic of different mode of action?
- Author
-
Shipa, Muhammad R. A., Di Cicco, Maria, Balogh, Emese, Nitu, Naila A., Mainuddin, M. D., Bhadauria, Naveen, Mukerjee, Dev, and Roussou, Euthalia
- Subjects
RHEUMATOID arthritis ,BIOTHERAPY ,ABATACEPT - Abstract
Objectives: To assess the best choice of second-line therapy between tumour necrosis factor-inhibitor (TNFi) and biologics of different-mode-ofaction (BDMA-rituximab/tocilizumab/abatacept) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by evaluating drug-survival following discontinuation of the first-line TNFi. Methods: This retrospective drug-survival study was performed across two different hospitals by conventional-statistics and machine-learning approach. Results: From a total of 435 patients, 213 (48.9%; TNFi = 122, BDMA = 91) discontinued their second-line biologic {median drug-survival: TNFi, 27 months [95% confidence interval (95%CI) 22-32] vs BDMA, 37 months (95%CI 32-52)}. As a second-line biologic, BDMA was likely to reduce the risk of treatment-discontinuation [hazard-ratio (HR) 0.63, 95%CI 0.48-0.83] compared to TNFi, but only in seropositive-patients (HR 0.52, 95%CI 0.38-0.73), not in seronegative-RA. Drug-survival benefit of BDMA over TNFi was not observed if the seropositive-patients were previously exposed to monoclonal-TNFi (HR 0.77, 95%CI 0.49-1.22) versus soluble-TNFi (etanercept/biosimilars) or if the first-line TNFi was terminated within 23.9 months of initiation (HR 0.97, 95%CI 0.56-1.68). Conclusions: BDMA, as a second-line biologic, is more likely to be sustained in seropositive-patients, particularly without prior exposure to monoclonal-TNFi. The drug-survival benefit of BDMA was not observed in seronegative-patients or if the first-line TNFi was stopped within 2 years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF