Search

Background: Liver resection may be complicated by unpredictable intraoperative bleeding. Pringle's maneuver was the first attempt to control bleeding, but the main problem is the duration of ischemia. Robotic surgery thanks to the magnified view, three-dimensional visualization associated and fine movement allow to perform good parenchymal dissection and identification of vascular structure. Aim of study is to evaluate blood loss and the need to perform Pringle maneuver in patients underwent robotic liver resection., Methods: Thirty-three patients underwent robotic liver resections were analyzed, 16 (48%) male and 17 (52%) female, with median age of 64 years. Seven (21%) patients had benign lesions and twenty-six (79%) malignant tumor., Results: Seventeen (52%) patients had anatomical resections, while sixteen (48%) patients had non anatomical resection. Operative time was 270 minutes. Estimated blood loss was 100 mL and Pringle maneuver was carried out on seven patients. Median hospital stay was 4 days., Conclusions: Our results show that liver resections with robotic technique can be performed safely even without systematic Pringle maneuver.

The optimal delay in the start of chemotherapy following rectal cancer surgery has not yet been identified. However, postponed adjuvant therapy has been proven to be connected with a significant survival detriment. We aimed to investigate whether the time to initiation of adjuvant treatment can be influenced by the application of minimally invasive surgery rather than traditional open surgery. By comprehensively evaluating the available inherent literature, several factors appear to be associated with delayed postoperative chemotherapy. Some of them are strictly related to surgical short-term outcomes. Laparoscopy results in shortened length of hospital stay, reduced surgical morbidity and lower rate of wound infection compared to conventional surgery. Probably due to such advantages, the application of minimally-invasive surgery to treat rectal malignancies seems to impact favorably the possibility to start adjuvant chemotherapy within an adequate timeframe following surgical resection, with potential improvement in patient survival.

Aim: Despite the laparoscopic right hemicolectomy has been validated by many randomized prospective trials, clear evidences on the validity of the totally mini-invasive technique, namely, through intracorporeal anastomosis, are still lacking. The aim of this study was the assessment of short-term outcome within three months from laparoscopic right colectomy with intra- or extra-corporeal anastomosis., Methods: With no exclusion, all patients undergoing laparoscopic right hemicolectomy at our institution have been enrolled in this study. Group A included patients undergoing laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with extracorporeal anastomosis (LAC) and Group B, included patients undergoing laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis (TLC). Patients' data, surgery details, results of postoperative period and histological tests have been prospectively recorded in a database and analysed., Results: Between December 2006 and December 2008, 45 patients underwent right hemicolectomy, 21 with extracorporeal anastomosis and 24 had intracorporeal ones. As to patients' characteristics and histopathological results there are no difference between the groups. Anastomotic dehiscence occurred one in group A and one in group B (P>0.05). Both patients underwent reoperation. We recorded 6 postoperative ileus with vomiting in the LAC group and only 1 in the TLC group (P<0.05). The incidence of Non-Surgical Site Complications (NSSC) was of 4.54% in LAC group and 8.33% in TLC group (P>0.05). Hospitalization was of 5 days for both groups., Conclusion: In conclusion, we believe that this technique is feasible in terms of safety; it doesn't significatively affect the length of surgical procedure and guarantees maintenance of oncological radicality standards of reference. Besides it significatively improves quality of the post-operative period.

Aim: The aim of the "Fast-Track Surgery" program is to decrease the perioperative stress response to surgical trauma and thus to decrease the complication rates after elective surgery. Critics of the "Fast-Track"(FT) rehabilitation may argue that all reports of successful programs came from major specialised hospital units and that implementation in smaller or less specialised units may be difficult, if not impossible., Methods: We retrospectively studied 101 patients that, from November 2004 to October 2007, underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery in our institute. A detailed "Fast-Track Surgery" protocol was prepared and given to patients, physicians and nurses, with the aim to create a standard treatment. Data about demographics, ASA score, preoperative complicating diseases, diagnosis, type of surgery and postoperative clinical data were analyzed. Univariate analysis of the relationship among all factors (patient characteristics, intervention characteristics, protocol compliance and presence of complications) described here and length of hospital stay was performed., Results: We compared our results to those of major trials previously published and observed no substantial differences in morbidity, mortality and length of postoperative hospital stay between the two. Univariate analysis showed that compliance to the elements of the FT protocol influences the length of postoperative period more significantly than the patient characteristics or surgical procedure., Conclusion: Based on six comparative single-centre studies, the FT program was found to reduce length of hospital stay and was deemed safe for major abdominal surgeries. The present study shows that enhanced recovery or FT program can also be implemented safely in a General Surgery Unit.