Search

Introduction: It is important to evaluate the performance of existing rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDTs) and the factors that can affect performance especially when the circulation dynamics of influenza strains change such as the displacement and replacement of the circulating seasonal influenza strains., Materials and Methods: Nasal swabs were collected from patients presenting at V Luna Medical Center, Armed Forces of the Philippines Health Service Command, with influenza-like illness (ILI) with one swab tested using Quickvue (QV) influenza A+B RIDT (Quidel) and the other swab tested using the ABI 7500 (Applied Biosystems) real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were estimated. We identified clinical symptoms predictive of influenza subtype and evaluated the independence of QV sensitivity on (1) Cycle threshold (Ct) value, controlling for timing of collection; (2) timing of collection, controlling for Ct value; and (3) Ct value and timing of collection taken together., Results: Between August 2011 and October 2016, patients presenting with ILI (n = 2333) underwent testing. Quickvue sensitivity across all subtypes was significantly correlated with lower Ct values (higher virus titers) (P <.001) and, except for flu A/H3 (P = .974), was also significantly associated with timing of specimen collection (P <.05). No statistically significant difference was noted in QV sensitivity for Flu A/H3 (P = .130), pandemic H1/N1 (P = .207), Flu A/H3 + pandemic H1/N1 (P = .341), and Flu B (P = .103) across different age groups but sensitivity of QV significantly differed (P <.001) across the different influenza subtypes., Conclusion: Overall specificity of QV was high across all flu subtypes, but overall sensitivity was low (Flu A/pdm H1) to moderate (Flu A/H3 and Flu B). The findings highlight the need to develop more sensitive influenza RDTs to detect circulating influenza strains and the use of the quadrivalent flu vaccine during the annual influenza vaccination., (Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2021. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.)

Introduction: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) belonging to the family Coronaviridae and genus Betacoronavirus is the causative agent of COVID-19 disease and was first identified in Wuhan, China. SARS-CoV-2 spread globally with >28 million cases and 911,000 deaths recorded worldwide as of September 12, 2020. The Philippines reported the first case of community transmission on March 5, 2020, and despite the government imposing one of the longest and strictest lockdowns in Southeast Asia, the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases still surged with >250,000 cases and 4,000 deaths reported as of September 12, 2020. It is important to estimate the burden and impact of SARS-CoV-2 on the military population since this can affect the military readiness., Materials and Methods: Nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs were collected and SARS-CoV-2 real-time RT-PCR testing was performed on the samples. Phylogenetic analysis was performed using sequences from 23 SARS-CoV-2-positive specimens from this study and sequences retrieved from GenBank and GISAID databases., Results: From April 14 to August 15, 2020, a total of 12,432 specimens were tested with 763 (6%) unique individuals testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 by rRT-PCR. In the military population, majority of the patients who were tested (80%) and those who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 (86%) were male. Military and civilian status was available for 7,672 patients with 515/5,042 (10%) positive among military patients and 248/2,630 (9%) positive among civilian patients. Both military and civilian populations had the highest case counts of SARS-CoV-2-positive cases in the 21- to 30- and 31- to 40-year-old age groups, while the 71- to 80-year-old age group had the highest proportion (18%) of SARS-CoV-2-positive cases. Sequencing analysis showed 19 different variants in the 23 genomes. Twenty of the 23 genomes were classified under clade GR/B1.1, 2 genomes were classified under clade GR/B1.1.28, and 1 genome was classified under Clade O/B.6. Twenty-two of the 23 sequences collected after June 25, 2020, contained the D614G mutation., Conclusion: We describe here the results of SARS-CoV-2 testing for military and civilian patients and personnel. The 21- to 30- and 31- to 40-year-old age groups had the highest case counts of SARS-CoV-2-positive cases. Sequencing results showed the presence of the D614G mutation in the spike protein in a majority of specimens collected from the end of June to July 2020., (Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2020. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.)

Introduction: Bacterial wound infections are a danger to both military and civilian populations. The nature of injury and infection associated with combat related wounds are important in guiding antibiotic prophylaxis and empiric treatment guidelines., Materials and Methods: The isolates were screened for drug-resistance by the MicroScan Walkaway Plus System using either the Negative Breakpoint Combo Panel (NBCP) 30 or 34 or Positive Breakpoint Combo Panel (PBPC) 20 or 23. Isolates with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ≥8 μg/mL to imipenem and/or meropenem were tested for both carbapenemase production using the CarbaNP test and real-time PCR to determine molecular resistance mechanisms. Plasmid conjugation analysis was performed to define potential for horizontal gene transfer., Results: We characterized 634 bacterial wound isolates collected from September 2013 to December 2017 from patients seen at a Philippine military tertiary hospital presenting with combat or non-combat injuries [354 (military) and 280 (civilians)]. Staphylococcus aureus was the most predominant bacterial species isolated from wounds in both populations (104/634, 16%). A variety of Gram-negative bacterial species comprised 442/634 (70%) of the isolates identified, with the most prevalent shown to be Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter cloacae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and Acinetobacter sp. Carbapenemase production was detected in 34/442 (8%) Gram-negative isolates. Testing for molecular resistance mechanisms showed 32/34 (17 military, 15 civilian) wound isolates were blaNDM positive and 2 were blaVIM positive, with the two blaVIM isolates found in the civilian population. Plasmid conjugation of 14 blaNDM and 2 blaVIM positive wound isolates representatives showed 2/16 (13%) produced E. coli J53 transconjugants (E. coli from a civilian; E. cloacae from a military)., Conclusion: We describe in this study the wound bacterial and antibiotic resistance profile in the military (combat vs non-combat associated) and civilian population. We observed that, with the exception of Acinetobacter sp., resistance of prevalent Gram-negative bacterial species to imipenem or meropenem were not significantly different between the military and civilian populations. We also presented data on the prevalent bacterial species isolated from both combat and non-combat wounds in a military tertiary care hospital setting as well as the carbapenemase-encoding gene primarily responsible for carbapenem resistance as well as evidence of horizontal transfer via mobile genetic elements. Clinicians may use this information to guide empiric antibiotic coverage for the predominant organisms if wound culture results are not readily available.A prospective, longitudinal evaluation of the wound bacterial profile documenting the changing bacterial flora using higher resolution molecular strategies can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the diversity, composition, and abundance of bacterial composition of the wound microbial community from the time of injury, during the course of evacuation from the field to higher level of care facilities, and up to wound resolution., (© Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2019. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)