Search

Background The Joint Trauma System (JTS) is a DoD Center of Excellence for Military Health System trauma care delivery and the DoD’s reference body for trauma care in accordance with National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017. Through the JTS, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been developed and subsequently refined to standardize and improve combat casualty care. Data are amassed through a single, centralized DoD Trauma Registry to support process improvement measures with specialty modules established as the registry evolved. Herein, we review the implementation of the JTS DoD Trauma Registry specialty Infectious Disease Module and the development of infection-related CPGs and summarize published findings on the subsequent impact of the Infectious Disease Module on combat casualty care clinical practice and guidelines. Methods The DoD Trauma Registry Infectious Disease Module was developed in collaboration with the Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program (IDCRP) Trauma Infectious Disease Outcomes Study (TIDOS). Infection-related information (e.g., syndromes, antibiotic management, and microbiology) were collected from military personnel wounded during deployment June 1, 2009 through December 31, 2014 and medevac’d to Landstuhl Regional Medical Center in Germany before transitioning to participating military hospitals in the USA. Results To support process improvements and reduce variation in practice patterns, data collected through the Infectious Disease Module have been utilized in TIDOS analyses focused on assessing compliance with post-trauma antibiotic prophylaxis recommendations detailed in JTS CPGs. Analyses examined compliance over three time periods: 6 months, one-year, and 5 years. The five-year analysis demonstrated significantly improved adherence to recommendations following the dissemination of the 2011 JTS CPG, particularly with open fractures (34% compliance compared to 73% in 2013-2014). Due to conflicting recommendations regarding use of expanded Gram-negative coverage with open fractures, infectious outcomes among patients with open fractures who received cefazolin or expanded Gram-negative coverage (cefazolin plus fluoroquinolones and/or aminoglycosides) were also examined in a TIDOS analysis. The lack of a difference in the proportion of osteomyelitis (8% in both groups) and the significantly greater recovery of Gram-negative organisms resistant to aminoglycosides or fluoroquinolones among patients who received expanded Gram-negative coverage supported JTS recommendations regarding the use of cefazolin with open fractures. Following recognition of the outbreak of invasive fungal wound infections (IFIs) among blast casualties injured in Afghanistan, the ID Module was refined to capture data (e.g., fungal culture and histopathology findings, wound necrosis, and antifungal management) needed for the TIDOS team to lead the DoD outbreak investigation. These data captured through the Infectious Disease Module provided support for the development of a JTS CPG for the prevention and management of IFIs, which was later refined based on subsequent TIDOS IFI analyses. Conclusions To improve combat casualty care outcomes and mitigate high-consequence infections in future conflicts, particularly in the event of prolonged field care, expansion, refinement, and a mechanism for sustainability of the DoD Trauma Registry Infectious Disease Module is needed to include real-time surveillance of infectious disease trends and outcomes.

Introduction In recent conflicts, the Joint Theater Trauma System (JTTS) led the systematic approach to improve battlefield trauma care, substantially contributing to the unprecedented survival of combat casualties. The Joint Trauma System (JTS) was codified in 2016 to preserve the lessons learned and functions of the JTTS, including the Department of Defense Trauma Registry. Concurrently, Combatant Commands (CCMD) were directed to establish CCMD Trauma Systems (CTS) “modeled after the JTTS” and to maintain a baseline of core functions intended to rapidly scale as needed. The complex nature of both CCMDs and the military trauma system has challenged the full implementation of the CTS. Analyzing the historical experiences of the JTTS, JTS, and CTS within a military doctrinal framework might enable the further success of the military trauma system. Methods The strategic, operational, and tactical levels of warfare, in accordance with Joint Publication 1-0, Doctrine of the Armed Forces of the United States, and Joint Publication 3-0, Joint Operations, established the analytic framework for this study. The literature regarding the JTTS, CTS, and JTS was reviewed for relevant information concerning organizational structure and functions of trauma system performance improvement (PI) capabilities. A comprehensive analysis was performed using a thematic approach to evaluating descriptive data contained within the collected data set. Deployed trauma system PI tasks, functions, and responsibilities were identified, defined, and correlated according to the respective levels of warfare. Results The comprehensive analysis revealed both discrete and overlapping tasks, functions, and responsibilities of the trauma system PI capabilities at each of the three levels of warfare. Strategic-level actions were categorized according to 12 distinct themes: reduce mortality; strategic reporting; centralized trauma registry; strategic communications; centralized organization; direct support to CCMDs; Department of Defense policy and doctrine; strategic-level PI; clinical practice guidelines; training and readiness standards; force structure, standardization, and interoperability; and research and development. Operational-level actions were categorized according to seven distinct themes: theater trauma system policies and requirements; theater trauma system leadership; stakeholder coordination; theater communication; theater standards for readiness and skill sustainment; trauma system planning; and medical logistics support. Tactical-level actions were categorized according to seven distinct themes: trauma system personnel; PI; documentation enforcement and patient care data collection; tactical planning recommendations for employing medical assets; research support; communication and reporting; and training and skills sustainment. Conclusion The deployed U.S. military trauma system requires a robust PI capability to optimize combat casualty care. Policy updates, a joint military trauma system doctrine, and force design updates are necessary for deployed military trauma system PI capabilities to function optimally across all levels of warfare.

Introduction Falls are a leading mechanism of injury. Hospitalization and outpatient clinic visits due to fall injury are frequently reported among both deployed and non-deployed U.S. Military personnel. Falls have been previously identified as a leading injury second only to sports and exercise as a cause for non-battle air evacuations. Materials and Methods This retrospective study analyzed the Department of Defense Trauma Registry fall injury data from September 11, 2001 to December 31, 2018. Deployed U.S. Military personnel with fall listed as one of their mechanisms of injury were included for analysis. Results Of 31,791 injured U.S. Military personnel captured by the Department of Defense Trauma Registry within the study time frame, a total of 3,101 (9.8%) incurred injuries from falls. Those who had fall injuries were primarily 21 to 30 years old (55.4%), male (93.1%), Army (75.6%), and enlisted personnel (56.9%). The proportion of casualties sustaining injuries from falls generally increased through the years of the study. Most fall injuries were classified as non-battle injury (91.9%). Falls accounted for 24.2% of non-battle injury hospital admissions with a median hospital stay of 2 days. More non-battle-related falls were reported in Iraq-centric military operations (62.7%); whereas more battle-related falls were reported in Afghanistan-centric military operations (58.3%). Conclusions This study is the largest analysis of deployed U.S. Military personnel injured by falls to date. Highlighted are preventive strategies to mitigate fall injury, reduce workforce attrition, and preserve combat mission capability. Level of Evidence Level III Epidemiologic.

We describe a 34-year-old soldier who sustained a blast injury in Syria resulting in tracheal 5 cm tracheal loss, cervical spine and cord injury with tetraplegia, multiple bilateral rib fractures, esophageal injury, traumatic brain injury, globe evisceration, and multiple extremity soft tissue and musculoskeletal injuries including a left tibia fracture with compartment syndrome. An emergent intubation of the transected trachea was performed in the field, and the patient was resuscitated with whole blood prehospital. During transport to the Role 2, the patient required cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrest. On arrival, he underwent a resuscitative thoracotomy and received a massive transfusion exclusively with whole blood. A specialized critical care team transported the patient to the Role 3 hospital in Baghdad, and the DoD extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) team was activated secondary to his unstable airway and severe hypoxia secondary to pulmonary blast injury. The casualty was cannulated in Baghdad approximately 40 hours after injury with bifemoral cannulae in a venovenous configuration. He was transported from Iraq to the U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research Burn Center in San Antonio without issue. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support was successfully weaned, and he was decannulated on ECMO day 4. The early and en route use of venovenous ECMO allowed for maintenance of respiratory support during transport and bridge to operative management and demonstrates the feasibility of prolonged ECMO transport in critically ill combat casualties.

Introduction Unlike other communal living environments (universities, boarding schools, and camps) that have been suspended during the COVID-19 pandemic, the deployed military force must continue its mission. Early challenges in the 2020 deployed environment included limited availability of living and quarantine space and limited testing capacity. This is a brief report of stringent quarantine strategies employed to newly arriving cohorts at a NATO and U.S. military base to prevent release of SARS-CoV-2 into a larger base population. Methods With awareness of the worldwide pandemic, beginning in late February 2020, all personnel arriving to the Hamid Karzai International Airport NATO base were quarantined for 14 days to prevent interaction with the wider base population. Testing capacity was limited. Names, locations, and dates of those within quarantine were tracked to improve contact tracing. Between February and April 2020, the first cases of SARS-CoV-2 were diagnosed on a military base in Afghanistan within quarantine. Results Within quarantine, 11 males became PCR positive for SARS-CoV-2 during April 2020. Five of the 11 were PCR tested for symptoms of fever, cough, or loss of taste. A sixth individual, who had been asymptomatic upon leaving the base after completion of quarantine, later developed symptoms and tested positive. Another five asymptomatic individuals were found with antibody testing just before planned release from 14 days of quarantine post-exposure and confirmed with PCR testing. All PCR-positive individuals were diagnosed before being released into the general population of the base because of strict screening, quarantine, and exit criteria. Conclusion Quarantine creates significant strain on resources in a deployed environment. Group quarantine facilities where social distancing is limited allow for the possibility for intra-quarantine transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Ideally, PCR testing is done upon entry into quarantine and upon exit. With the possibility of false-negative PCR or limited PCR testing, we recommend daily symptom screening, pulse oximetry, temperature checks, and small quarantine groups that must “graduate” together—all meeting exit criteria. Any introduction of new individual, even with negative testing, to a group increases risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Upon exit of quarantine, testing should be performed, regardless of entry testing. If PCR is limited, serology testing should be done, followed by PCR, if positive. Serology testing can be combined with clinical judgment to conserve PCR testing for quarantine release of asymptomatic individuals.

Introduction In battle-injured U.S. service members, head and neck (H&N) injuries have been documented in 29% who were treated for wounds in deployed locations and 21% who were evacuated to a Role 4 MTF. The purpose of this study is to examine the H&N surgical workload at deployed U.S. military facilities in Iraq and Afghanistan in order to inform training, needed proficiency, and MTF manning. Materials and Methods A retrospective analysis of the DoD Trauma Registry was performed for all Role 2 and Role 3 MTFs, from January 2002 to May 2016; 385 ICD-9 CM procedure codes were identified as H&N surgical procedures and were stratified into eight categories. For the purposes of this analysis, H&N procedures included dental, ophthalmologic, airway, ear, face, mandible maxilla, neck, and oral injuries. Traumatic brain injuries and vascular injuries to the neck were excluded. Results A total of 15,620 H&N surgical procedures were identified at Role 2 and Role 3 MTFs. The majority of H&N surgical procedures (14,703, 94.14%) were reported at Role 3 facilities. Facial bone procedures were the most common subgroup across both roles of care (1,181, 75.03%). Tracheostomy accounted for 16.67% of all H&N surgical procedures followed by linear repair of laceration of eyelid or eyebrow (8.23%) and neck exploration (7.41%). H&N caseload was variable. Conclusions H&N procedures accounted for 8.25% of all surgical procedures performed at Role 2 and Role 3 MTFs; the majority of procedures were eye (40.54%) and airway (18.50%). These data can be used as planning tools to help determine the medical footprint and also to help inform training and sustainment requirements for deployed military general surgeons especially if future contingency operations are more constrained in terms of resources and personnel.

Introduction In deployed contexts, military medical care is provided through the coordinated efforts of multiple interdisciplinary teams that work across and between a continuum of widely distributed role theaters. The forms these teams take, and functional demands, vary by roles of care, location, and mission requirements. Understanding the requirements for optimal performance of these teams to provide emergency, urgent, and trauma care for multiple patients simultaneously is critical. A team’s collective ability to function is dependent on the clinical expertise (knowledge and skills), authority, experience, and affective management capabilities of the team members. Identifying the relative impacts of multiple performance factors on the accuracy of care provided by interdisciplinary clinical teams will inform targeted development requirements. Materials and Methods A regression study design determined the extent to which factors known to influence team performance impacted the effectiveness of small, six to eight people, interdisciplinary teams tasked with concurrently caring for multiple patients with urgent, emergency care needs. Linear regression analysis was used to distinguish which of the 11 identified predictors individually and collectively contributed to the clinical accuracy of team performance in simulated emergency care contexts. Results All data met the assumptions for regression analyses. Stepwise linear regression analysis of the 11 predictors on team performance yielded a model of five predictors accounting for 82.30% of the variance. The five predictors of team performance include (1) clinical skills, (2) team size, (3) authority profile, (4) clinical knowledge, and (5) familiarity with team members. The analysis of variance confirmed a significant linear relationship between team performance and the five predictors, F(5, 240) = 218.34, P Conclusions The outcomes of this study demonstrate that the collective knowledge, skills, and abilities within an urgent, emergency care team must be developed to the extent that each team member is able to competently perform their role functions and that smaller teams benefit by being composed of clinical authorities who are familiar with each other. Ideally, smaller, forward-deployed military teams will be an expert team of individual experts, with the collective expertise and abilities required for their patients. This expertise and familiarity are advantageous for collective consideration of significant clinical details, potential alternatives for treatment, decision-making, and effective implementation of clinical skills during patient care. Identifying the most influential team performance factors narrows the focus of team development strategies to precisely what is needed for a team to optimally perform.

Introduction The medical treatment facilities (MTF) represent the equivalent of the healthcare system in the home countries, but they face the limitations of an outpost at the end of the supply chain. The capabilities are limited, and the necessary effort to extend the treatment capacity is tremendous. Algorithms based on scientific evidence or at least profound medical expertise are a tool to facilitate the decision-making process in triage under difficult circumstances. The aim of this article is to present a protocol that regards the specific entities military MTF abroad have to deal with in context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Material and Methods To prepare our own health system within the Resolute Support mission, an interdisciplinary team of consultants and nurses located at the multinational role 2E, Camp Marmal, Mazar-e-Sharif, Afghanistan, individually reviewed medical databases and the current literature concerning triage on intensive care units. The identified literature was evaluated by all authors. In the next step, an adapted flow chart for triage on intensive care unit in MTF abroad was set up on the basis of existing triage tools found in the reviewed literature. Results The authors created the “Structured Approach for Intensive Care Unit Triage (SAINT)” protocol. It is an approach that fits to the specific entities (e.g., limited medical resources in the whole system, limited intensive care unit capabilities for long-term stay or organ replacement therapy, etc.) that determine the framework of the special military health system abroad. Conclusions The presented triage protocol may be a tool for medical personnel to facilitate the difficult task of triaging. It provides guidance along patient-centered criteria like individual medical, ethical, and legal issues while taking into account the available resources. Future studies are needed to investigate the effectiveness of the SAINT protocol.

Introduction In 2010, the Joint Trauma System published a clinical practice guideline (CPG) for providing care to patients with suspicion of spinal cord injury. The CPG advocated for liberal use of cervical collars and adequate documentation of the practice. This performance improvement project examined C-spine CPG adherence in both the prehospital and military treatment facility (MTF) settings. Understanding challenges in CPG adherence facilitates evaluation of future CPGs and their success at implantation of the clinical guidance. Materials and Methods The Department of Defense Trauma Registry was used to identify US Military casualties meeting the criteria for cervical collar placement between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2018. Criteria for cervical collar placement were defined as any patient who experienced a mechanism of injury relating to an explosion, fall, or motor-vehicle-related injury. Any patients with an AIS severity score greater than 1 to the head or having any ICD injury codes related to either upper spinal cord or head injury were also considered for inclusion. Adherence of cervical collar placement was defined by documented ICD codes or prehospital documentation of cervical collar placement as captured in the registry. Results A total of 14,837 patients were identified for possible cervical collar placement and 3,317 had verifiable documentation of having a C-collar placed. Documented C-collar placement was higher after the publication of the clinical practice guideline in 2010 (29% vs. 15%, p Conclusion Application of cervical collars has increased significantly, since the initial publication of the spine injury CPG. Current gaps include valid and reliable identification of patients warranting specific clinical interventions and documentation of patient care. Currently, lack of documentation is reported as nonadherence, but it remains unknown if these missing clinical data accurately portray nonadherence or adherence with lack of documentation. Future research and resources would benefit and expand the results collected in this paper, and cement the importance of CPG publication and adherence.

Introduction: The impact of disease and nonbattle injury (DNBI) on casualty burden of military operations has historically been greater than that of battle-related injuries. The ratio of battle to DNBI casualties has changed as advances in equipment, hygiene, and infectious diseases have been made; however, during military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, 30% of serious injuries treated or evacuated from the area of operations were secondary to NBI. Most DoD research and intervention efforts focus on battle injuries; NBI has received much less practical attention. We aimed to explore the potential utility of the largest Department of Defense casualty database in identifying potential intervention targets for preventing NBI events. Materials and Methods: Phase I was a comprehensive NBI literature review from historical and current military operations. Phase II was an IRB exempt initial examination of relevant data contained in the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DoDTR). Phase I: A MEDLINE search using the terms “military”, “injury”, and “nonbattle/non battle” was performed, and articles containing useful data points to characterize the unique risks of the modern deployed military environment and identify potentially preventable NBI hazards in the modern deployed military environment were retrieved and reviewed in full-text. Phase II: This information was used to explore data within the DoDTR’s and its ability to provide data to inform NBI prevention efforts in the following areas: most prevalent NBI causes, NBI location and timing related to operational tempo, characteristics of the population at risk for NBI. Results: Phase I: Falls and motor vehicle crashes (MVCs) accounted for most of the serious NBI in Iraq and Afghanistan. No specific epidemiologic data was readily available to guide NBI prevention efforts. Phase II was limited to NBI and falls from Iraq and Afghanistan in the DoDTR. Only aggregate data were available with a total of 1829 falls and 1899 MVCs. Case fatality for falls was 1.1% and for MVCs 6.5%. The greatest frequency of NBI was in Iraq among U.S. Army personnel, but comparison of rates is not possible without reliable denominators for individual variables. Annual NBI incidence seems proportional to overall level of personnel deployed to each theater, but without knowledge of the true denominator of total deployed personnel, it is impossible to conclude definitively. The annual number of falls was stable throughout the period of highest operational tempo in Iraq (2003–2011), although MVCs were more common earlier in the operation (2003–2005), likely corresponding to greater operational maneuver. Conclusions: The deployed military environment is dangerous and NBI presents a primary prevention target for expeditionary operations. The DoDTR is a database of detailed injury and medical care information and lacks much of the data required to perform a comprehensive epidemiologic NBI analysis. Specific prevention recommendations cannot be made based solely on DoDTR data and integration with other DoD databases that assess operational and tactical data should be considered.

IntroductionMaintaining readiness among Army surgeons is increasingly challenging because of declining operative experience during certain deployments. Novel solutions should be considered.Materials and MethodsA pilot program was conducted to rotate surgical teams from a military treatment facility with a low volume of combat casualty care to one with a higher volume. Pre- and postrotation surveys were conducted to measure relative operative experience, trauma experience, and perceived readiness among rotators.ResultsOperative volumes and trauma volumes were increased and that perceived readiness among rotators, especially those with the fewest previous deployments, was improved.ConclusionsMaintaining readiness among Army surgeons is a difficult task, but a combination of increased trauma care while in garrison, as well as increased humanitarian care during deployments, may be helpful. Additionally, rotating providers from facilities caring for few combat casualties to facilities caring for more combat casualties may also be feasible, safe, and helpful.

Increased resource constraints secondary to a smaller medical footprint, prolonged evacuation times, or overwhelming casualty volumes all increase the challenges of effective management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the austere environment. Prehospital providers are responsible for the battlefield recognition and initial management of TBI. As such, targeted education is critical to efficient injury recognition, promoting both provider readiness and improved patient outcomes. When austere conditions limit or prevent definitive treatment, a comprehensive understanding of TBI pathophysiology can help inform acute care and enhance prevention of secondary brain injury. Field deployable, noninvasive TBI assessment and monitoring devices are urgently needed and are currently undergoing clinical evaluation. Evidence shows that the assessment, monitoring, and treatment in the first few hours and days after injury should focus on the preservation of cerebral perfusion and oxygenation. For cases where medical management is inadequate (eg, evidence of an enlarging intracranial hematoma), guidelines have been developed for the performance of cranial surgery by nonneurosurgeons. TBI management in the austere environment will continue to be a challenge, but research focused on improving evidence-based monitoring and therapeutic interventions can help to mitigate some of these challenges and improve patient outcomes.

In the current deployed environment, small teams are dispersed to provide damage control surgical capabilities within an hour of injury. Given the well-developed evacuation system, these teams do not typically have a significant patient hold capability. Improved understanding of the shortfalls and problems encountered when caring for combat casualties in prolonged care situations will facilitate improved manning, training, and equipping of these resource-limited teams. We present the case of two critically injured soldiers who were evacuated to a 10-person split Forward Surgical Team (FST) during a weather system that precluded further evacuation. The casualties underwent damage control procedures necessitating temporary abdominal closures. The FST had to organize itself to provide intensive care significantly longer than traditional timelines for this role of care. Additionally, most team members had scarce critical care experience. An after-action review confirmed that most team members felt that they had not received adequate pre-mission training in postoperative intensive care and were not comfortable managing ventilated patients. In the current mature theaters of operations, there are robust evacuation capabilities, and presentations of scenarios like that are rare. However, as combat casualty care becomes increasingly austere and remote, small surgical teams need to train and be equipped to provide care outside of normal operation and doctrinal limits, including robust team cross-training. Incorporating principles of the prolonged care of combat casualties into the training of military surgeons will improve preparedness for these challenging situations.

Introduction Hypocalcemia is a known sequela of citrated blood product transfusion. Civilian data suggest hypocalcemia on hospital admission is associated with worse outcomes. Initial calcium levels in military casualties have not previously been analyzed. The objective of this retrospective review aimed to assess the initial calcium levels in military trauma casualties at different Forward Surgical Teams (FST) locations in Afghanistan and describe the effects of prehospital blood product administration on arrival calcium levels. Materials and Methods This is a retrospective cohort analysis of military casualties arriving from point of injury to one of two FSTs in Afghanistan from August 2018 to February 2019 split into four locations. The primary outcome was incidence of hypocalcemia (ionized calcium Results There were 101 patients included; 55 (54.5%) experienced hypocalcemia on arrival to the FST with a mean calcium of 1.16 mmol/L (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14 to 1.18). The predominant mechanism of injury consisted of blast patterns, 46 (45.5%), which conferred an increased risk of hypocalcemia compared to all other patterns of injury (odds ratio = 2.42, P = .042). Thirty-eight (37.6%) patients required blood product transfusion. Thirty-three (86.8%) of the patients requiring blood product transfusion were hypocalcemic on arrival. Mean initial calcium of patients receiving blood product was 1.13 mmol/L (95% CI, 1.08 to 1.18), which was significantly lower than those who did not require transfusion (P = .01). Eight (7.9%) of the patients received blood products before arrival, with 6/8 (75%) presenting with hypocalcemia. Conclusions Hypocalcemia develops rapidly in military casualties and is prevalent on admission even before transfusion of citrated blood products. Blast injuries may confer an increased risk of developing hypocalcemia. This data support earlier use of calcium supplementation during resuscitation.

Introduction Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is spreading all over the world. Health systems around the globe have to deal with decreased capabilities and exhausted resources because of the surge of patients. The need to identify COVID-19 patients to achieve a timely opportunity to treat and isolate them is an ongoing challenge for health care professionals everywhere. A lack of testing capabilities forces clinicians to make the crucial initial decision on the basis of clinical findings and routine diagnostic laboratory test. This article reviews the current literature and presents a new adapted protocol for diagnosing and triaging COVID-19 patients. A special emphasis lies on the stepwise approach guiding the medical provider to a triage decision that is suitable for the individual patient and the situation of the local medical treatment facility. Materials and Methods On March 30, 2020, a PubMed based literature research on COVID-19 following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines was performed. A diagnostic and triage tool for COVID-19 was designed based on the major findings in the reviewed literature. Results After a selection process, focusing on the topics “epidemiology,” “clinical characteristics,” and “diagnostic tools,” 119 out of a total amount of 1,241 publications were selected to get an overview of the growing evidence. Conclusions The designed Early Recognition and Triage Tool enables the medical provider to use the applicable modules of the protocol for capabilities of the local setting to get the most appropriate diagnostic and triage done. The tool should give guidance for the initial approach until specific testing for the COVID-19 virus is available.

Whole blood is the preferred product for resuscitation of severe traumatic hemorrhage. It contains all the elements of blood that are necessary for oxygen delivery and hemostasis, in nearly physiologic ratios and concentrations. Group O whole blood that contains low titers of anti-A and anti-B antibodies (low titer group O whole blood) can be safely transfused as a universal blood product to patients of unknown blood group, facilitating rapid treatment of exsanguinating patients. Whole blood can be stored under refrigeration for up to 35 days, during which it retains acceptable hemostatic function, though supplementation with specific blood components, coagulation factors or other adjuncts may be necessary in some patients. Fresh whole blood can be collected from pre-screened donors in a walking blood bank to provide effective resuscitation when fully tested stored whole blood or blood components are unavailable and the need for transfusion is urgent. Available clinical data suggest that whole blood is at least equivalent if not superior to component therapy in the resuscitation of life-threatening hemorrhage. Low titer group O whole blood can be considered the standard of care in resuscitation of major hemorrhage.

Introduction No published study has reported non-surgical interventions performed by forward surgical teams, and there are no current surgical benchmarks for forward surgical teams. The objective of the study was to describe operative procedures and non-operative interventions received by battlefield casualties and determine the operative procedural burden on the trauma system. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of data from the Joint Trauma System Forward Surgical Team Database using battle and non-battle injured casualties treated in Afghanistan from 2008–2014. Overall procedure frequency, mortality outcome, and survivor morbidity outcome were calculated using operating room procedure codes grouped by the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project classification. Cumulative attributable burden of procedures was calculated by frequency, mortality, and morbidity. Morbidity and mortality burden were used to rank procedures. Results The study population was comprised of 10,992 casualties, primarily male (97.8%), with a median age interquartile range of 25.0 (22.0–30.0). Affiliations were non-U.S. military (40.0%), U.S. military (35.1%), and others (25.0%). Injuries were penetrating (65.2%), blunt (32.8), and burns (2.0%). Casualties included 4.4% who died and 14.9% who lived but had notable morbidity findings. After ranking by contribution to trauma system morbidity and mortality burden, the top 10 of 32 procedure groups accounted for 74.4% of operative care, 77.9% of mortality, and 73.1% of unexpected morbidity findings. These procedure groups included laparotomy, vascular procedures, thoracotomy, debridement, lower and upper gastrointestinal procedures, amputation, and therapeutic procedures on muscles and upper and lower extremity bones. Most common non-operative interventions included X-ray, ultrasound, wound care, catheterization, and intubation. Conclusions Forward surgical team training and performance improvement metrics should focus on optimizing commonly performed operative procedures and non-operative interventions. Operative procedures that were commonly performed, and those associated with higher rates of morbidity and mortality, can set surgical benchmarks and outline training and skillsets needed by forward surgical teams.

IntroductionTactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) is the execution of prehospital trauma skills in the combat environment. TCCC was recognized by the 2018 Department of Defense Instruction on Medical Readiness Training as a critical wartime task. This study examines the training, understanding, and utilization of TCCC principles and guidelines among US Army medical providers and examines provider confidence of medics in performing TCCC skills.Materials and MethodsA cross-sectional survey, developed by members of the Committee on TCCC, was distributed to all US Army Physicians and Physician Assistants via anonymous electronic communication.ResultsA total of 613 completed surveys were included in the analyses. Logistic regression analyses were conducted on: TCCC test score of 80% or higher, confidence with medic utilization of TCCC, and medic utilization of ketamine in accordance with TCCC.Conclusions

Introduction Orthopedic surgery constitutes 27% of procedures performed for combat injuries. General surgeons may deploy far forward without orthopedic surgeon support. This study examines the type and volume of orthopedic procedures during 15 years of combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. Materials and Methods Retrospective analysis of the US Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DoDTR) was performed for all Role 2 and Role 3 facilities, from January 2002 to May 2016. The 342 ICD-9-CM orthopedic surgical procedure codes identified were stratified into fifteen categories, with upper and lower extremity subgroups. Data analysis used Stata Version 14 (College Station, TX). Results A total of 51,159 orthopedic procedures were identified. Most (43,611, 85.2%) were reported at Role 3 s. More procedures were reported on lower extremities (21,688, 57.9%). Orthopedic caseload was extremely variable throughout the 15-year study period. Conclusions Orthopedic surgical procedures are common on the battlefield. Current dispersed military operations can occur without orthopedic surgeon support; general surgeons therefore become responsible for initial management of all injuries. Debridement of open fracture, fasciotomy, amputation and external fixation account for 2/3 of combat orthopedic volume; these procedures are no longer a significant part of general surgery training, and uncommonly performed by general/trauma surgeons at US hospitals. Given their frequency in war, expertise in orthopedic procedures by military general surgeons is imperative.

Introduction The combat experience during the re-entry stages of Operation Inherent Resolve was distinct from other recent operations, but there is no published literature regarding these “initial entry operations” experiences among forward surgical teams (FSTs) deployed to Role 2 facilities A descriptive analysis of patients treated by FSTs may provide valuable information for Role 2 surgical teams preparing to deploy in support of initial entry operations. The purpose of this analysis was to describe injury mechanism, wounding patterns and interventions performed by a small FST in the re-entry phase in Iraq. Materials and Methods From July 17, 2015 to January 31, 2016, a split surgical team with two surgeons and an ER physician documented care for all patients treated by their FST located in Iraq. Given their austere environment, FSTs have limited holding capacity, blood supply, and ability to triage and perform advanced procedures. Patients, who arrived to the Role 2 in asystole, were ineligible for the study. The patient population was Iraqi Security Forces as well as Iraqi civilians. No follow-up data were obtained. Using descriptive statistics, we described the basic demographics, health status, blood utilization, injury severity, and injury pattern of the patient population. Results The final study population included 300 Iraqi casualties. The majority of patients (96%) were discharged alive. Many patients were 16 years or older (96%), male (96%), Iraqi soldiers (86%), and injured during battle (96%). Over one-third of patients (35%) had a form of metabolic acidosis, 7% were hypothermic, and 18% were in shock at admission. The median amount of blood products used was 6 (interquartile ranges (IQR) = 2–12) units, while the median red blood cells:fresh frozen plasma ratio was 1.2:1. Six or more units of blood were given to 67 (22%) patients. The top three diagnoses were laceration (n = 197, 21%), penetrating injury (n = 185, 19%), and fracture (n = 174, 18%). A high number of injuries occurred in the extremities/pelvis and buttocks (n = 360, 38%) and in the abdomen and pelvic contents (n = 145, 15%). Over a quarter of patients (26%) had critical injuries (i.e., military injury severity score ≥25). Conclusions Given the Role 2 configuration, these results demonstrate FSTs must be capable of managing critically ill patients with markedly limited resources. This management will include general operations in both adult and pediatric patients, resuscitation with a limited blood supply, and patient assessment with minimal to no diagnostic tools. This analysis can inform resident training, pre-deployment training, as well as sustainment training for surgeons after residency.

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Report on Zero Preventable Deaths highlighted the need for a military and civilian partnership to take lessons learned from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and incorporate them into a national learning trauma care system. One of the specific objectives in the report was to establish military preventable death metrics. Upon further inspection, it became apparent that the Department of Defense did not have an established methodology to reliably estimate and report preventable death metrics and opportunities to improve the military trauma care system. Over the last year, clinical and non-clinical subject matter experts from the Joint Trauma System and Armed Forces Medical Examiners System began the process of establishing a standard military preventable death review process to meet the objective outlined in the report. Based on an assessment to understand methodological best practices for preventable death reviews, this manuscript presents the conceptual framework that is guiding our effort to establish the first ever battle-related mortality surveillance system with preventable death metrics and opportunities to improve the trauma care system.

While combat-related pelvis fractures are more commonly open, higher energy, and complex in pattern than those seen in the civilian setting, the principles of management are similar. The primary differences are related to the austere setting in which the initial management takes place, and the lack of resources typically available. Initial management consists of cessation of hemorrhage, along with the multi-disciplinary prioritized management of associated injuries, and skeletal stabilization. This is most commonly achieved with a compressive sheet or pelvic binder, with pelvic external fixation when resources allow, and debridement of open wounds as necessary. Definitive, internal fixation is delayed until the patient arrives at a higher echelon of care.

Critically injured trauma patients benefit from timely transport and care. Accordingly, the provision of rapid transport and effective treatment capabilities in appropriately close proximity to the point of injury will optimize time and survival. Pre-transport tactical combat casualty care, rapid transport with en route casualty care, and advanced damage control resuscitation and surgery delivered early by small, mobile, forward-positioned Role 2 medical treatment facilities have potential to reduce morbidity and mortality from trauma. This retrospective review and descriptive analysis of trauma patients transported from Role 1 entities to Role 2 facilities in Afghanistan from 2008 to 2014 found casualties to be diverse in affiliation and delivered by various types and modes of transport. Air medical evacuation provided transport for most patients, while the shortest transport time was seen with air casualty evacuation. Although relatively little data were collected for air casualty evacuation, this rapid mode of transport remains an operationally important method of transport on the battlefield. For prehospital care provided before and during transport, continued leadership and training emphasis should be placed on the administration and documentation of tactical combat casualty care as delivered by both medical and non-medical first responders.

Historically, cold injury, hypothermia, and frostbite have been severe problems for military units on the battlefield. Kenneth D. Orr and David C. Fainer captured these difficulties in their book, Cold Injuries in Korea During Winter of 1950-51, still cited in military medical readiness training. While not common in modern conflicts, the potential exists for large numbers of these casualties in war and during training.