Search

Background: The deep circumflex iliac artery (DCIA) is rarely used as a perforator flap, despite a clear clinical need for thin osteocutaneous flaps, particularly in head and neck reconstruction. The poor adoption of such a flap is largely due to a poor understanding of the perforators of the DCIA, despite recent publications demonstrating suitable vascular anatomy of the DCIA perforators, particularly evident with the use of preoperative computed tomographic angiography (CTA). We have applied this method of peroperative imaging to successfully select those patients suitable for the DCIA perforator flap and use it clinically. Methods: We present a case series of patients who underwent DCIA perforator flap reconstruction following preoperative planning with CTA. Imaging findings, clinical course, and outcomes are presented. Results: Six out of seven patients planned for DCIA perforator flap reconstruction underwent a successful DCIA perforator flap, with imaging findings confirmed at operation, and without any flap loss, hernia, or other significant flap-related morbidities. Because of abberent anatomy and change in defect following excision of pathology, one patient was converted to a free fibular flap. Conclusion: With preoperative CTA planning, the DCIA perforator flap is a versatile and feasible flap for reconstruction of the mandible and extremities. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery, 2011.

The importance of the venous drainage of the anterior abdominal wall to free tissue transfer in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap surgery has been highlighted in several recent publications in this journal, however the same attention has not been given to superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flaps, in which the flap necessarily relies on the superficial venous drainage. We describe a unique case, in which the presence of two superficial inferior epigastric veins (SIEVs) draining into separate venous trunks was identified. The use of only one trunk led to a well-demarcated zone of venous congestion. A clinical study was also conducted, assessing 200 hemiabdominal walls with preoperative computed tomographic angiography imaging. The presence of more than a single major SIEV trunk was present in 80 hemiabdominal walls (40% of overall sides). There was considerable variability in the source of drainage of the SIEV, draining variably into the deep inferior epigastric vein, the great saphenous vein, the saphenous bulb, a common trunk with the superficial circumflex iliac vein or a common trunk with a second branch of the SIEV. These findings highlight the considerable variation in the number of SIEV trunks as well as their source of regional drainage, and show the importance of consideration of such variation.

Introduction: The superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) is a useful pedicle in supply to the lower abdominal integument, with its use sparing damage to rectus abdominis muscle or sheath. However, it is limited in usefulness due to its anatomical variability. While previous anatomical studies have been limited in number and study design, the use of preoperative imaging has enabled the analysis of this vasculature in large numbers and greater anatomical detail. Methods: A clinical anatomical study of 500 hemi-abdominal walls in 250 consecutive patients undergoing preoperative computed tomographic angiography (CTA) prior to autologous breast reconstruction was undertaken. The presence, size, location, and branching pattern of the SIEA were assessed in each case. Results: The SIEA was identified in 468 cases, an incidence of 94%. Its mean diameter was 0.6 mm, and in 24% of cases was of a diameter >1.5 mm. SIEA location was highly variable, with mean position 2-cm lateral to the linea semilunaris (range 0–8 cm lateral), and relationship to the superficial inferior epigastric vein (SIEV) was also highly variable, with the distance between them ranging from 0.3 to 8.5 cm apart. SIEA branches directly crossed the abdominal midline in 5% of cases. Larger SIEA diameters correlated with a decrease in diameter of ipsilateral DIEA perforators. Conclusion: The SIEA is present more frequently than previously demonstrated, but is typically too small for use in free tissue transfer. The variable degree of SIEA branching suggests that its territory of supply is also variable, and that preoperative imaging may be useful in planning SIEA flaps.

Background: The previously described “perfusion zones” of the abdominal wall vasculature are based on filling of the deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) and all its branches simultaneously. With the advent of the DIEA perforator flap, only a single or several perforators are included in supply to the flap. As such, a new model for abdominal wall perfusion has become necessary. The concept of a “perforator angiosome” is thus explored. Methods: A clinical and cadaveric study of 155 abdominal walls was undertaken. This comprised the use of 10 whole, unembalmed cadaveric abdominal walls for angiographic studies, and 145 abdominal wall computed tomographic angiograms (CTAs) in patients undergoing preoperative imaging of the abdominal wall vasculature. The evaluation of the subcutaneous branching pattern and zone of perfusion of individual DIEA perforators was explored, particularly exploring differences between medial and lateral row perforators. Results: Fundamental differences exist between medial row and lateral row perforators, with medial row perforators larger (1.3 mm vs. 1 mm) and more likely to ramify in the subcutaneous fat toward the contralateral hemiabdomen (98% of cases vs. 2% of cases). A model for the perfusion of the abdominal wall based on a single perforator is presented. Conclusion: The “perforator angiosome” is dependent on perforator location, and can mapped individually with the use of preoperative imaging. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Microsurgery, 2010.

BACKGROUND: The anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap has become increasingly popular due to its versatility and minimal donor site morbidity. Its major limitation has been uncertainty in predicting perforator anatomy, with the occasional absence of suitable perforators and high variability in their size and course. The variability of this anatomy has not been adequately explored previously. METHODS: A cadaveric study was undertaken, in which 19 thighs (from 10 fresh cadavers) underwent contrast injection and angiographic imaging. Anatomical variations of the vasculature were recorded. A clinical study of 44 patients undergoing ALT flap reconstruction was also undertaken. Perforator anatomy was described in the first 32 patients, and the subsequent 12 patients underwent computed tomography angiography with a view to predicting individual anatomy and improving operative outcome. RESULTS: Cadaver angiography was able to highlight and classify the variations in arterial anatomy, with four patterns observed and marked variability between cases. In 32 patients undergoing ALT flaps without preoperative CT angiography (CTA), five patients (16%) did not have any suitable perforators from the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery. By selecting the limb of choice with preoperative CTA, the incidence of flap unsuitability was reduced to 0%. Comparing CTA with Doppler, CTA was more accurate (sensitivity 100%) and provided more information. CONCLUSION: The perforators supplying the ALT flap show significant variability in location and course, with the potential for unsuitable perforators limiting flap success. Preoperative CTA can demonstrate the vascular anatomy and can aid perforator selection and operative success.

The deep circumflex iliac artery (DCIA) provides a dependable option for use as an osteo-musculo-cutaneous flap, particularly in mandibular reconstruction. Modifications to flaps based on DCIA perforators have been sought to prevent donor site morbidity as a consequence of muscle cuff harvest. Previous studies have been inconsistent in their descriptions of perforator anatomy, and means of assessing these preoperatively have not been widely described. A clinical anatomical study was undertaken, with a cohort of 44 hemiabdominal walls in 22 consecutive patients undergoing preoperative computed tomographic angiography (CTA) before free flap surgery. The feasibility of CTA and the regional vascular anatomy were both assessed. The use of CTA was shown to demonstrate DCIA perforators with high resolution and to be able to assess vessel size and location. In 44 hemiabdominal walls, there were 44 perforators of >0.8 mm diameter. There were no suitable perforators in 40% of sides, with 32% of sides having one perforator >0.8 mm diameter, 16% having two perforators

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous perforators that do not originate from the deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) are rare, but may significantly affect operative outcome. Peritoneal-cutaneous perforators have been described as a source for augmenting the blood flow to a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap, however if unrecognized, may compromise flap survival. METHODS: We reviewed 375 DIEA perforator (DIEP) flaps (325 with preoperative CTA and 50 cadaveric dissections) to investigate the incidence of this anomaly. RESULTS: We detected this variation in 3/325 (1%) of DIEP flaps following preoperative computed tomography. In 1/50 (2%) of the cadaveric specimens, a peritoneal-cutaneous perforator was found and injected with lead oxide contrast. It was shown to fill the cutaneous veins of the majority of the lower abdominal integument. CONCLUSION: Peritoneal-cutaneous perforators are rare anatomical variations (4/375: 1.1%) that may have significant ramifications for surgery utilizing the vasculature of the abdominal wall. CTA was significantly able to detect this anomaly and aid operative planning. Preoperative CTA helps to safely identify individual vascular anatomy including rare variations.

Preoperative imaging of the donor site vasculature for deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) perforator flaps and other abdominal wall reconstructive flaps has become more commonplace. Abdominal wall computed tomography angiography (CTA) has been described as the most accurate and reproducible modality available for demonstrating the location, size, and course of individual perforators. We drew on our experience of 75 consecutive patients planned for DIEA-based flap surgery undertaking CTA at a single institution. Seven of these cases have been reported to highlight the utility of CTA for preoperative planning, emphasizing the unique information supplied by CTA that may influence operative outcome. Among all cases that underwent preoperative imaging with CTA, there was 100% flap survival, with no partial or complete flap necrosis. We found that in three of the cases described, the choice of operation was necessarily selected based on CTA findings (DIEA perforator flap, transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap, and superficial superior epigastric artery flap). In addition, three cases demonstrate that CTA findings may dictate the decision to operate at all, and one case demonstrates the utility of CTA for evaluating the entire abdominal contents for comorbid conditions. Our experience with CTA for abdominal wall perforator mapping has been highly beneficial. CTA may guide operative technique and improve perforator selection in uncomplicated cases, and in difficult cases it can guide the most appropriate operation or indeed if an operation is appropriate at all. This is particularly the case in the setting of comorbidities or previous abdominal surgery.

Introduction: The anterolateral thigh flap is an increasingly popular reconstructive option despite uncertainty in its perforator anatomy. Perforators are not always present, vary in size and intramuscular course, and have variable cutaneous courses and supply. As such, preoperative imaging has become favored. Methods: The current study describes the preliminary use of two new modalities for preoperative imaging: computed tomography (CT) Angiography and CT-guided stereotaxy. These have been utilized in the preoperative imaging of two patients undergoing ALT flap reconstruction. Each patient underwent each of these techniques combined with Doppler ultrasound, the previous standard modality. The size, location, and course of perforators were explored and compared with operative findings. Results: Both techniques are technically feasible, highly accurate, and provide more information to the surgeon than ultrasound. Conclusion: CT Angiography and CT-guided stereotaxy are useful adjuncts to Doppler ultrasound for imaging perforators prior to ALT flaps. A larger study is suggested to quantify the accuracy of these techniques.

The deep circumflex iliac artery (DCIA) is rarely used as a perforator flap, despite a clear clinical need for thin osteocutaneous flaps, particularly in head and neck reconstruction. The poor adoption of such a flap is largely due to a poor understanding of the perforators of the DCIA, despite recent publications demonstrating suitable vascular anatomy of the DCIA perforators, particularly evident with the use of preoperative computed tomographic angiography (CTA). We have applied this method of peroperative imaging to successfully select those patients suitable for the DCIA perforator flap and use it clinically.We present a case series of patients who underwent DCIA perforator flap reconstruction following preoperative planning with CTA. Imaging findings, clinical course, and outcomes are presented.Six out of seven patients planned for DCIA perforator flap reconstruction underwent a successful DCIA perforator flap, with imaging findings confirmed at operation, and without any flap loss, hernia, or other significant flap-related morbidities. Because of abberent anatomy and change in defect following excision of pathology, one patient was converted to a free fibular flap.With preoperative CTA planning, the DCIA perforator flap is a versatile and feasible flap for reconstruction of the mandible and extremities.

While free flaps are reliant on their vascular pedicle for survival intraoperatively and for a variable period of time postoperatively, there have been reports of late pedicle compromise after which complete flap survival has ensued. Successful neovascularization and revascularization at the edges of a flap in such cases result in the flap becoming independent of its pedicle. We report a case in which free flap survival occurred following pedicle compromise before postoperative day seven. The use of preoperative computed tomographic angiography (CTA) assessment to map flap vasculature was able to demonstrate the intrinsic vascular anatomy of the flap, and both clinical assessment and photoplethysmography (PPG) assessment of cutaneous blood flow obtained during and after flap compromise were able to highlight the changes in flap perfusion. With complete flap survival despite the lack of pedicle revision, the roles for close monitoring with clinical assessment and PPG, and delaying debridement are discussed.

The superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) is a useful pedicle in supply to the lower abdominal integument, with its use sparing damage to rectus abdominis muscle or sheath. However, it is limited in usefulness due to its anatomical variability. While previous anatomical studies have been limited in number and study design, the use of preoperative imaging has enabled the analysis of this vasculature in large numbers and greater anatomical detail.A clinical anatomical study of 500 hemi-abdominal walls in 250 consecutive patients undergoing preoperative computed tomographic angiography (CTA) prior to autologous breast reconstruction was undertaken. The presence, size, location, and branching pattern of the SIEA were assessed in each case.The SIEA was identified in 468 cases, an incidence of 94%. Its mean diameter was 0.6 mm, and in 24% of cases was of a diameter1.5 mm. SIEA location was highly variable, with mean position 2-cm lateral to the linea semilunaris (range 0-8 cm lateral), and relationship to the superficial inferior epigastric vein (SIEV) was also highly variable, with the distance between them ranging from 0.3 to 8.5 cm apart. SIEA branches directly crossed the abdominal midline in 5% of cases. Larger SIEA diameters correlated with a decrease in diameter of ipsilateral DIEA perforators.The SIEA is present more frequently than previously demonstrated, but is typically too small for use in free tissue transfer. The variable degree of SIEA branching suggests that its territory of supply is also variable, and that preoperative imaging may be useful in planning SIEA flaps.

The previously described "perfusion zones" of the abdominal wall vasculature are based on filling of the deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) and all its branches simultaneously. With the advent of the DIEA perforator flap, only a single or several perforators are included in supply to the flap. As such, a new model for abdominal wall perfusion has become necessary. The concept of a "perforator angiosome" is thus explored.A clinical and cadaveric study of 155 abdominal walls was undertaken. This comprised the use of 10 whole, unembalmed cadaveric abdominal walls for angiographic studies, and 145 abdominal wall computed tomographic angiograms (CTAs) in patients undergoing preoperative imaging of the abdominal wall vasculature. The evaluation of the subcutaneous branching pattern and zone of perfusion of individual DIEA perforators was explored, particularly exploring differences between medial and lateral row perforators.Fundamental differences exist between medial row and lateral row perforators, with medial row perforators larger (1.3 mm vs. 1 mm) and more likely to ramify in the subcutaneous fat toward the contralateral hemiabdomen (98% of cases vs. 2% of cases). A model for the perfusion of the abdominal wall based on a single perforator is presented.The "perforator angiosome" is dependent on perforator location, and can mapped individually with the use of preoperative imaging.

The abdominal wall donor site has become popularized for autologous breast reconstruction, with low donor site morbidity one of its key attributes. Further improvements in donor site outcomes have been facilitated through muscle sparing techniques, such as the use of the deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) perforator (DIEP) flap, and the use of modifications to closing the rectus sheath following muscular dissection, such as the use of endoscopic techniques and the use of mesh. We describe a new and unique method for potentially minimizing donor site damage during DIEP flap harvest: the "limited rectus sheath incisions" technique. This approach is only possible in select cases, the choice of which can be aided with the use of preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA). In select patients, there may be an extended segment of DIEA that does not give any musculocutaneous perforators, and thus does not require open exposure. In such cases, limited incision to the rectus sheath may be made: one to access the periumbilical perforators and a separate incision to access the pedicle near its origin on the external iliac artery. This incision may then be made in a muscle-splitting fashion, in the line of external oblique fibers. This approach may reduce damage to the anterior rectus sheath, and may contribute to improving donor site morbidity. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Microsurgery, 2009.

Imaging of the abdominal wall vasculature prior to deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) perforator (DIEP) flaps has been shown to significantly improve surgical outcomes. Although computed tomography angiography (CTA) has been shown to be highly accurate, it is associated with radiation exposure, and as such modalities without radiation exposure have been sought. Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) has been proposed as such an option. We conducted a pilot study comparing MRA with CTA and with operative findings in six consecutive patients undergoing DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction. The DIEA, superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) and perforators were all assessed with each modality. We found that the DIEA and SIEA were accurately imaged with both CTA and MRA, but that while MRA could identify some major perforators, CTA was more accurate than MRA for perforator mapping. As such, while MRA does have a role in the imaging of DIEA perforators, CTA is still the preferred modality. On the basis of these findings, a larger study into the role for MRA in this setting is warranted.

Cutaneous perforators that do not originate from the deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) are rare, but may significantly affect operative outcome. Peritoneal-cutaneous perforators have been described as a source for augmenting the blood flow to a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap, however if unrecognized, may compromise flap survival.We reviewed 375 DIEA perforator (DIEP) flaps (325 with preoperative CTA and 50 cadaveric dissections) to investigate the incidence of this anomaly.We detected this variation in 3/325 (1%) of DIEP flaps following preoperative computed tomography. In 1/50 (2%) of the cadaveric specimens, a peritoneal-cutaneous perforator was found and injected with lead oxide contrast. It was shown to fill the cutaneous veins of the majority of the lower abdominal integument.Peritoneal-cutaneous perforators are rare anatomical variations (4/375: 1.1%) that may have significant ramifications for surgery utilizing the vasculature of the abdominal wall. CTA was significantly able to detect this anomaly and aid operative planning. Preoperative CTA helps to safely identify individual vascular anatomy including rare variations.

Background: Breast reconstruction is increasingly performed with the use of the abdominal wall donor site, with potential complications including donor site morbidity and impaired flap viability. As a tool for selecting the optimal perforators which will ultimately supply the flap, preoperative imaging with computed tomography angiography (CTA) has become increasingly popular. Potential benefits include reduced intramuscular dissection, with faster and safer dissection, reduced donor site morbidity and improved flap vascularity and survival. Despite the potential for improvements in operative outcome, any benefits are yet to be established. Methods: A cohort study of 104 breast reconstructions in 88 patients was conducted. All patients underwent breast reconstruction based on an abdominal wall free flap. Of these, 40 patients undergoing preoperative imaging with CTA and 48 patients not undergoing CTA were included, with all CTAs undertaken at a single institution. Length of operation, length of stay, and operative complications were assessed. An evaluation of operative stress was achieved with the use of visual analogue scales (VAS) administered to the surgeons. Results: The use of CTA was associated with decreased operating time (mean: 77 min for bilateral cases), significantly decreased complications related to flap viability (particularly partial flap loss), and a statistically significant reduction in donor site morbidity. Psychometric testing of surgeons revealed a statistically significant decrease in operative stress (41% decrease) with the use of preoperative CTA. Conclusion: The use of CTA for preoperative imaging in breast reconstruction is associated with improved operative outcomes. V V C 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Microsurgery 28:516–523, 2008.

Preoperative imaging is sought prior to DIEA (Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery) perforator flaps due to the potential for maximizing operative success and minimizing operative complications. Recent advances include the use of computed tomography (CT) angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography. Image-guided stereotactic surgery is a recent technique that has been used with success in several fields of surgery. The variability of perforator anatomy makes DIEA perforator flap surgery a suitable candidate for such technology, but as yet this has not been described. A study was undertaken to determine the feasibility of CT-guided stereotaxy technique in DIEA perforator flap surgery and to compare findings with both conventional CTA and operative findings. Five consecutive patients planned for an elective DIEA perforator flap were recruited. Each patient underwent preoperative imaging of the anterior abdominal wall vasculature with both conventional CTA and CT-guided stereotactic imaging. Imaging findings were compared to operative findings. In all cases, all the major perforators were accurately localized with stereotactic imaging and with conventional CTA. Stereotactic navigation demonstrated a slightly better (nonsignificant) correlation with perforator location than conventional CTA. As such, CT-guided stereotactic imaging is an accurate method for the preoperative planning of DIEA perforator flaps, providing additional and potentially more accurate data to conventional CTA. With no additional scanning required, the method described in this paper allows the combined use of both methods for preoperative planning.