9 results on '"Mei R"'
Search Results
2. The usefulness of the Electronic Patient Visit Assessment (ePVA)
- Author
-
Janet H, Van Cleave, Mei R, Fu, Antonia V, Bennett, Catherine, Concert, Ann, Riccobene, Anh, Tran, Allison, Most, Maria, Kamberi, Jacqueline, Mojica, Justin, Savitski, Elise, Kusche, Mark S, Persky, Zujun, Li, Adam S, Jacobson, Kenneth S, Hu, Michael J, Persky, Eva, Liang, Patricia M, Corby, and Brian L, Egleston
- Subjects
Original Article - Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) experience painful, debilitating symptoms and functional limitations that can interrupt cancer treatment, and decrease their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The Electronic Patient Visit Assessment (ePVA) for head and neck is a web-based mHealth patient-reported measure that asks questions about 21 categories of symptoms and functional limitations common to HNC. This article presents the development and usefulness of the ePVA as a clinical support tool for real-time interventions for patient-reported symptoms and functional limitations in HNC. METHODS: Between January 2018 and August 2019, 75 participants were enrolled in a clinical usefulness study of the ePVA. Upon signing informed consent, participants completed the ePVA and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) general (C30) questionnaire v3.0 (scores range from 0 to 100 with 100 representing best HRQoL). Clinical usefulness of the ePVA was defined as demonstration of reliability, convergent validity with HRQoL, and acceptability of the ePVA (i.e., >70% of eligible participants complete the ePVA at two or more visits and >70% of ePVA reports are read by providers). Formal focus group discussions with the interdisciplinary team that cared for patients with HNC guided the development of the ePVA as a clinical support tool. Qualitative and quantitative methods were used throughout the study. Descriptive statistics consisting of means and frequencies, Pearson correlation coefficient, and Student’s t-tests were calculated using SAS 9.4 and STATA. RESULTS: The participants were primarily male (71%), White (76%), diagnosed with oropharyngeal or oral cavity cancers (53%), and undergoing treatment for HNC (69%). Data analyses supported the reliability (alpha =0.85), convergent validity with HRQoL scores, and acceptability of the ePVA. Participants with the highest number of symptoms and functional limitations reported significantly worse HRQoL (sum of symptoms: r=–0.50, P
- Published
- 2019
3. Real-time detection and management of chronic illnesses
- Author
-
Fu, Mei R., primary
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. The usefulness of the Electronic Patient Visit Assessment (ePVA)© as a clinical support tool for real-time interventions in head and neck cancer
- Author
-
Van Cleave, Janet H., primary, Fu, Mei R., additional, Bennett, Antonia V., additional, Concert, Catherine, additional, Riccobene, Ann, additional, Tran, Anh, additional, Most, Allison, additional, Kamberi, Maria, additional, Mojica, Jacqueline, additional, Savitski, Justin, additional, Kusche, Elise, additional, Persky, Mark S., additional, Li, Zujun, additional, Jacobson, Adam S., additional, Hu, Kenneth S., additional, Persky, Michael J., additional, Liang, Eva, additional, Corby, Patricia M., additional, and Egleston, Brian L., additional
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. The development, usability, and reliability of the Electronic Patient Visit Assessment (ePVA) for head and neck cancer
- Author
-
Zujun Li, Catherine Concert, Antonia V. Bennett, Justin Savitski, Janet H. Van Cleave, Eva Liang, Adam S. Jacobson, Kenneth S. Hu, Mei R. Fu, Amanda Peyser, Ann Riccobene, Brian L. Egleston, Mark S. Persky, Anh T. Tran, Maria Kamberi, Allison Most, Michael J. Persky, and Jacqueline Mojica
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Activities of daily living ,business.industry ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,Health Informatics ,Usability ,Dysphagia ,Convergent validity ,Informed consent ,medicine ,Content validity ,Physical therapy ,Original Article ,medicine.symptom ,business ,Think aloud protocol ,mHealth - Abstract
Background: Annually, over 65,000 persons are diagnosed with head and neck cancer in the United States. During treatment, up to 50% of patients become severely symptomatic with pain, fatigue, mouth sores, and inability to eat. Long term complications are lymphedema, fibrosis, dysphagia, and musculoskeletal impairment. Patients��� ability to perform daily activities and to interact socially may be impaired, resulting in poor quality of life. A pragmatic, clinically useful assessment is needed to ensure early detection and intervention for patients to report symptoms and functional limitations over time. We developed the Electronic Patient Visit Assessment (ePVA) that enables patients to report 42 symptoms related to head and neck cancer and 17 limitations of functional status. This manuscript reports (I) the development of the ePVA, (II) the content validity of the ePVA, and (III) the usability and reliability of the ePVA. Methods: Usability was evaluated using the ���Think Aloud��� technique to guide the iterative process to refine the ePVA based on participants��� evaluations. After signing the informed consent, 30 participants with head and neck cancer completed the ePVA using digital tablet devices while thinking aloud about ease of use. All patient conversations were recorded and professionally transcribed. Reliability of the ePVA symptom and functional limitation measures was estimated using the Kuder-Richardson test. Convergent validity of the ePVA was evaluated using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 global QoL/health scale. Transcribed qualitative data were analyzed using directed content analysis approach. Quantitative analyses consisted of descriptive statistics and correlation analyses. Results: Among participants, 90% strongly agreed or agreed that the ePVA system was easy to use and 80% were very satisfied. Only minor usability problems were reported due to formatting and software ���bugs���. Reporting of usability problems decreased in frequency over the study period and no usability problems were reported by the last 3 participants who completed the ePVA. Based on participants��� suggestions during the iterative process, refinement of the ePVA included increased touch sensitivity of the touch screen technology and customized error messages to improve ease of use. The ePVA also recorded patient reported symptoms (mouth symptoms: 93%, fibrosis: 60%, fatigue: 60%). The ePVA demonstrated acceptable reliability (alpha =0.82���0.85) and convergent validity (ePVA total number of reported symptoms and function limitations was negatively correlated with EORTC QLQ-C30 global QOL/health scale: r=���0.55038, P
- Published
- 2019
6. The development, usability, and reliability of the Electronic Patient Visit Assessment (ePVA) for head and neck cancer
- Author
-
Van Cleave, Janet H., primary, Fu, Mei R., additional, Bennett, Antonia V., additional, Persky, Mark S., additional, Li, Zujun, additional, Jacobson, Adam, additional, Hu, Kenneth S., additional, Most, Allison, additional, Concert, Catherine, additional, Kamberi, Maria, additional, Mojica, Jacqueline, additional, Peyser, Amanda, additional, Riccobene, Ann, additional, Tran, Anh, additional, Persky, Michael J., additional, Savitski, Justin, additional, Liang, Eva, additional, and Egleston, Brian L., additional
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Machine learning for detection of lymphedema among breast cancer survivors
- Author
-
Fu, Mei R., primary, Wang, Yao, additional, Li, Chenge, additional, Qiu, Zeyuan, additional, Axelrod, Deborah, additional, Guth, Amber A., additional, Scagliola, Joan, additional, Conley, Yvette, additional, Aouizerat, Bradley E., additional, Qiu, Jeanna M., additional, Yu, Gary, additional, Van Cleave, Janet H., additional, Haber, Judith, additional, and Cheung, Ying Kuen, additional
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. mHealth self-care interventions: managing symptoms following breast cancer treatment
- Author
-
Fu, Mei R., primary, Axelrod, Deborah, additional, Guth, Amber A., additional, Rampertaap, Kavita, additional, El-Shammaa, Nardin, additional, Hiotis, Karen, additional, Scagliola, Joan, additional, Yu, Gary, additional, and Wang, Yao, additional
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. The usefulness of the Electronic Patient Visit Assessment (ePVA) © as a clinical support tool for real-time interventions in head and neck cancer.
- Author
-
Van Cleave JH, Fu MR, Bennett AV, Concert C, Riccobene A, Tran A, Most A, Kamberi M, Mojica J, Savitski J, Kusche E, Persky MS, Li Z, Jacobson AS, Hu KS, Persky MJ, Liang E, Corby PM, and Egleston BL
- Abstract
Background: Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) experience painful, debilitating symptoms and functional limitations that can interrupt cancer treatment, and decrease their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The Electronic Patient Visit Assessment (ePVA) for head and neck is a web-based mHealth patient-reported measure that asks questions about 21 categories of symptoms and functional limitations common to HNC. This article presents the development and usefulness of the ePVA as a clinical support tool for real-time interventions for patient-reported symptoms and functional limitations in HNC., Methods: Between January 2018 and August 2019, 75 participants were enrolled in a clinical usefulness study of the ePVA. Upon signing informed consent, participants completed the ePVA and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) general (C30) questionnaire v3.0 (scores range from 0 to 100 with 100 representing best HRQoL). Clinical usefulness of the ePVA was defined as demonstration of reliability, convergent validity with HRQoL, and acceptability of the ePVA (i.e., >70% of eligible participants complete the ePVA at two or more visits and >70% of ePVA reports are read by providers). Formal focus group discussions with the interdisciplinary team that cared for patients with HNC guided the development of the ePVA as a clinical support tool. Qualitative and quantitative methods were used throughout the study. Descriptive statistics consisting of means and frequencies, Pearson correlation coefficient, and Student's t-tests were calculated using SAS 9.4 and STATA., Results: The participants were primarily male (71%), White (76%), diagnosed with oropharyngeal or oral cavity cancers (53%), and undergoing treatment for HNC (69%). Data analyses supported the reliability (alpha =0.85), convergent validity with HRQoL scores, and acceptability of the ePVA. Participants with the highest number of symptoms and functional limitations reported significantly worse HRQoL (sum of symptoms: r=-0.50, P<0.0001; sum of function limitations: r=-0.56, P<0.0001). Ninety-two percent of participants (59 of 64) who had follow-up visits within the 6-month study period completed the ePVA at two or more visits and providers read 89% (169 of 189) of automated ePVA reports. The use of the ePVA as a clinical support tool for real-time interventions for symptoms and functional limitations reported by patients is described in a clinical exemplar., Conclusions: This research indicates that the ePVA may be a useful mHealth tool as a clinical support tool for real-time interventions for patient-reported symptoms and functional limitations in HNC. The study findings support future translational research to enhance the usefulness of the ePVA in real world settings for early interventions that decrease symptom burden and improve the QoL of patients with HNC., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-19-250). The series “Real-Time Detection and Management of Chronic Illnesses” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. MRF serves as an unpaid Guest Editor of the series and serves as an unpaid editorial board member of mHealth from Aug 2018 to Jul 2020. MRF reports grants from Louis and Rachel Rudin Foundation Interdisciplinary Pilot Project Award, from NIH/2017 Palliative Care Research Cooperative Group Investigator Development Pilot Award (funded by National Institute of Nursing Research U24NR014637); from New York University Research Challenge Fund, and from John A. Harford Foundation Change AGEnts Action Award, during the conduct of the study. BLE reports grants from USA. National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute (P30CA006927 Fox Chase Cancer Center Support Grant), during the conduct of the study. JHVC reports grants from Louis and Rachel Rudin Foundation Interdisciplinary Pilot Project, from 2017 Palliative Care Research Cooperative Group Investigator Development Pilot (funded by National Institute of Nursing Research U24NR014637), grants from NYU University Research Challenge Fund, grants from John A. Harford Foundation Change AGEnts Action Award, during the conduct of the study. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare., (2021 mHealth. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.