Search

This paper describes a new seamless blended multi‐model ensemble configuration of an existing probabilistic medium‐ to extended‐range weather pattern forecasting tool (called Decider) run operationally at the Met Office. In its initial configuration, the tool calculated and presented probabilistic weather pattern forecast information for five individual ensemble forecasting systems, which varied in terms of their number of ensemble members, horizontal resolution, update frequencies and forecast lead time. This resulted in multiple forecasts for the same validity time which varied in terms of forecast skill depending on the lead time in question. This presented challenges for end‐users (e.g., operational meteorologists) in terms of knowing which forecast output is best to use and at which lead time, as well as knowing what to do in situations where forecasts varied between ensembles. To get around these challenges, a new seamless blended multi‐model ensemble configuration has been implemented operationally, comprising of output from five separate ensembles, and provides a single best forecast from day one out to day 45. Objective verification for a set of eight weather pattern groups covering forecasts initialized over a 6‐year period (2017–2022) shows that the seamless blended multi‐model ensemble forecasts are at least as good as, if not better than the best performing individual model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Medium- to long-range precipitation forecasts are a crucial component in mitigating the impacts of fluvial flood events. Although precipitation is difficult to predict at these lead times, the forecast skill of atmospheric circulation tends to be greater. The study explores using weather patterns (WPs) as a preliminary step in producing forecasts of upper-tail precipitation threshold exceedance probabilities for the UK. The WPs are predefined, discrete states representing daily mean sea-level pressure (MSLP) over a European--North Atlantic domain. The WPs most likely to be associated with flooding are highlighted by calculating upper-tail exceedance probabilities derived from the conditional distributions of regional precipitation given each WP. WPs associated with higher probabilities of extreme precipitation are shown to have occurred during two well-known flood events: the 2014 Somerset Levels floods in southwest England; and Storm Desmond over the northern UK in December 2015. To illustrate the potential of this WP-based prediction framework, a forecast guidance tool called Fluvial Decider is introduced. It is intended for use by hydro-meteorologists in the England and Wales Flood Forecasting Centre (FFC). Forecasts of the MSLP from ensemble prediction systems (EPSs) are assigned to the closest-matching WP, providing daily probabilistic forecasts of WPs out to the chosen lead time. Combining these probabilities with observed precipitation threshold exceedance probabilities provides a parsimonious tool for highlighting potential periods with increased risk of flooding. Model forecasts using the European Centre forMedium-range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) EPS highlighted both flood events as being at a higher than average risk of heavy extreme precipitation at lead times of over five days. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Forecasts of high‐impact weather systems require sufficiently high resolution of state‐of‐the‐art numerical models in order to resolve the small‐scale features. At the National Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting (NCMRWF) in India, a global ensemble prediction system (EPS—called the NEPS) has been implemented operationally at 12 km horizontal grid size. The NEPS configuration is based on the UK Met Office Global and Regional Ensemble Prediction System (MOGREPS). Initial condition perturbations are generated by the ensemble transform Kalman filter (ETKF) method. Model uncertainties are taken care of by stochastic kinetic energy backscatter (SKEB) and random parameters (RP) schemes. Forecast perturbations obtained from 6 hr short forecasts of 22 ensemble members are updated by the ETKF four times a day (0000, 0600, 1200 and 1800 UTC). Perturbations of surface parameters such as sea‐surface temperature, soil moisture content and soil temperature are also included in the new NEPS. The NEPS aims to provide 10 day probabilistic long forecasts using 23 ensemble members (22 perturbed plus one control). The long forecast provided at 0000 UTC is the combination of 11 members from the 0000 UTC cycle and lagged 11 members from the 1200 UTC cycle. The new NEPS shows improvements in terms of forecast agreement among the members in comparison with the previously operational NEPS that was running at 33 km horizontal grid size with 44 perturbed members. The ratio between the root mean square error of the ensemble mean and ensemble spread as a function of lead time has improved in both the Northern and Southern Hemispheres in the new NEPS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]