Search

Micro-arc oxidation (MAO) was performed on AZ31 and AZ91 Mg alloys to explore the relationship between Mg substrates and corrosion behaviors of resultant coatings. The microstructure and long-term corrosion performance of the two coatings were investigated. Results showed that MAO coating on AZ91 alloy provided a longer-term corrosion protection to substrate than that on AZ31 alloy, despite having similar microstructure and phase composition. However, once corrosion occurred, the corrosion area of MAO coating on AZ91 alloy enlarged at a faster rate compared to that on AZ31 alloy during immersion tests, and their corrosion morphologies were different. Based on the corrosion features of Mg substrates and MAO coatings, roles of substrates on the corrosion processes of coatings were analyzed.

The oxide coatings were prepared on 6061 Al alloy at different negative current densities in oxalic acid using the hybrid pulse anodization (HPA) method at room temperature. The variation curves of positive and negative voltages with anodization time were recorded. The nanopore diameters and distribution regularities in HPA coatings were analyzed with the Image-Pro Plus software based on field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) images. The results showed that the negative current could reduce the growth rate of HPA coatings, and thus led to a small thickness of the coatings within the same anodization time. Besides, appropriate negative current densities resulted in the better distribution uniformity of nanopores, but the excessive negative current densities tended to cause inferior nanopore arrangement. These were attributed to the existence of the negative current, causing H+ and O2− to move in opposite directions, so that a large number of H+ concentrated on the surface of the HPA coatings, resulting in the accelerated dissolution of the coatings.

Two kinds of metal oxide coatings were fabricated on 7050 Al alloy by hard anodization (HA) and micro-arc oxidation (MAO) techniques. The microstructure, phase composition, and corrosion behavior of the two coatings were studied by scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, and corrosion tests, respectively. When compared with the HA coating, the MAO one was more effective to isolate the substrate from the corrosive environment. In addition, as confirmed by electrochemical tests, the MAO coating was of better corrosion resistance than the HA coating. Furthermore, it was revealed by neutral salt spray test that the MAO coating could protect substrate alloy over 1140 h, while the HA coating can only protect substrate alloy for 46 h due to the amorphous composition and through thickness defects (micro-pores and micro-cracks).