Search

Amelanotic melanoma (AM) is a rare subtype of melanoma with little or no clinically visible pigment; it is more difficult to diagnose than pigmented melanoma (PM), and has a worse prognosis. In the attempt to find a genetic explanation for the distinction between AM and PM, we conducted a case-case study, matching AM and PM patients, and testing them for germline mutations in high- (p16INK4A, p14ARF, CDK4) and low-penetrance (MC1R) melanoma susceptibility genes. Similar CDKN2A mutations were found in both sets of melanomas. A p14ARF splice germline mutation was detected for the first time in an Italian family with AM. This rare mutation, which has been described only once previously, may be involved in predisposition to the amelanotic phenotype in combination with germline MC1R variants and coordinate somatic expression of pigmentation genes and their regulators.

Proteomics provides a powerful approach for screening alterations in protein expression and post-translational modification associated with particular human diseases. In this study, the analysis of protein expression was focused on malignant melanoma in order to determine the candidate genes involved in tumour progression. The proteomes of cultured melanocytes and of cell lines from primary and metastatic lesions of one malignant melanoma patient were profiled using two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE) and mass spectrometry. Differentially expressed proteins were confirmed by 2-DE and mass spectrometry on an additional four malignant melanoma cell lines. Total RNA from the first subset of cell lines was used for quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of the candidate genes identified after proteomics analysis. A very high similarity was observed in the 2-DE maps of two malignant melanoma cell lines derived from primary and secondary lesions of the same patient. Mass spectrometry identified 37 proteins which were found to be more abundant in tumour cells in comparison with control melanocytes (as confirmed on additional cell lines), with a relatively high prevalence of stress proteins. Eight candidate genes (PRDX2, HSP27, HSP60, HSPA8, HSP9B, STIP1, PDI and P4HB) were further characterized by evaluating their messenger RNA expression levels through real-time RT-PCR analysis. Overexpression of HSP27, HSP60 and HSPA8 and downregulation of PRDX2 were observed in cells from metastatic malignant melanoma in comparison with those from primary melanoma. Although further investigations with larger numbers of paired normal and tumour samples are needed, our findings strongly suggest that the dysregulation of stress pathways may be involved in melanoma progression.

Putative tumour suppressor genes CDKN2A and CDKN2B (on chromosome 9p21) and CDKN2A-interacting cell growth regulatory genes CDK4 and Id-1 have been demonstrated to be involved in the pathogenesis of malignant melanoma (MM). Mutation analysis of these candidate genes was performed in MM families from southern Italy with three or more affected members or two affected members and one or more relative with histologically diagnosed atypical naevus. Two CDKN2A mutations, Arg24Pro and 1-292 G>A, were observed in two (15%) families; except for CDKN2A and Id-1 polymorphisms, no sequence variations were detected in the remaining genes. Screening among 119 sporadic MM cases revealed two additional CDKN2A mutations at very low prevalences. Identification of a large shared haplotype at 9p21 in some MM families negative for CDKN germline mutations suggests that other CDKN-inactivating mechanisms may be responsible for MM predisposition or, alternatively, additional susceptibility gene(s) may be present on chromosome 9p21. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of a subset of MM tissue sections seemed to indicate that the D9S171 locus may be involved in MM pathogenesis.