Search

The free testosterone to cortisol ratio (fTC) and heart rate variability (HRV) indices have been independently proposed as objective biomarkers of physiological resilience and readiness, respectively. It is hypothesized that individuals that enter a training period with high resilience and readiness would have a greater positive response to the training. PURPOSE: Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the association between fTC and HRV with fitness changes in division I male college soccer players. METHODS: Two division I teams were recruited to participate in this study. Participants completed an orthostatic HRV challenge (supine, sitting, standing) and provided blood samples prior to the 6-week Spring training period. The HRV indices of root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) and high frequency power (autoregressive, normalized; HF) were calculated in all postural conditions. Blood samples were assayed for free testosterone and cortisol using competitive binding ELISAs. Participants completed the yo-yo intermittent recovery test (YYIR) before and after the 6-week training period and the absolute increase in distance (m) achieved during the YYIR represented the change in fitness (YYIRΔ). Separate linear regression models tested the association of fTC and all HRV indices and their interactions with YYIRΔ. All predictors were first centered and scaled and alpha level was set at p < 0.05 for all models. RESULTS: Participants (n = 21, age = 19.5±1.0 years, height = 179.0±6.4 cm, weight = 76.9±9.4 kg, body fat = 12.6±4.3 %) from the two teams did not differ in YYIRΔ (mean±SD = 438±212, p = 0.64). A significant association with YYIRΔ was observed for the interaction between fTC and HFsitting (F(3,17) = 4.31, β = 4.92,p = 0.02, R² = 0.33). No other indices or interactions were significantly associated with YYIRΔ. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that HRV and fTC represent potential objective pre-training biomarkers capable of identifying athletes that will be most responsive to individualized fitness and conditioning programs. Further research is necessary to confirm the utility of these specific objective biomarkers in larger cohorts and across multiple training situations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]