Search

Background and aims: The purpose of this study was to understand more completely the (tacit) curriculum design models of medical faculty. We report on two research questions: (1) Can medical faculty give an account of their curriculum design assumptions? and (2) What are their assumptions concerning curriculum design? Method: We conducted an explorative, qualitative case study. We interviewed educational decision makers at the three Danish medical schools and associate professors from different courses concerning curriculum design. We carried out four individual, in-depth interviews and four focus groups with 20 participants in all. Results and conclusions: Only one decision maker had an explicit curriculum design model. However, all participants had assumptions concerning curriculum design. We displayed their assumptions as five essentially different and increasingly complex models: the method-driven, pragmatically driven content-driven, outcome-driven and vision-driven curriculum design models. In the five models, the role of learning outcomes differs. The differences range from a belief that learning outcomes are essential, to a belief that learning outcomes are unimportant, to a belief that learning outcomes are incompatible with higher education. Finally, we found that teachers do not necessarily play a clear, central role in curriculum design. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Newly qualified doctors are expected to be able to conduct a cardiac auscultation unassisted, but studies show conflicting results regarding cardiac auscultation skills., Methods: A two-part test instrument was designed containing innovative recordings of heart sounds from patients with common cardiac murmurs as well as healthy controls. A total number of 109 participants were tested, representing four levels of clinical experience. The content validity of the test instrument was studied by a postal questionnaire to 114 clinical teachers at the University Hospital of Aarhus, Denmark., Results: A significant correlation was found between level of experience and the ability to diagnose the conditions from which the murmurs originated (r = 0.45, P < 0.0001). No correlation was found between level of experience and the ability to identify persons with cardiac murmurs from healthy controls. All groups showed a tendency to interpret healthy heart sounds as cardiac murmurs., Conclusions: Diagnostic ability was found to correlate positively with clinical experience, whereas the ability to distinguish cardiac murmurs from normal heart sounds seems independent of clinical experience.