Search

Anatomical knowledge is the foundation of the educational curricula in most healthcare programs. The varying scopes of practice between healthcare professions require anatomy educators to determine what content is essential to cover in a finite time with learners. When possible, the anatomy educator bases this decision on clinical experiences; this is a more significant challenge for the non-clinician educator teaching in a health profession curriculum. Although studies have determined essential anatomy content in many healthcare professions, no study has been undertaken in physical therapist education. This study was designed to determine what anatomical concepts are considered essential in physical therapist education in one doctor of physical therapy program. Faculty (The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-022-01574-1.

Anatomical knowledge is requisite for effective physical therapy (PT) practice. Cadaver dissection is a popular teaching method employed in PT anatomy courses. Limited time in the laboratory requires effective dissection instructions. Several limitations of a printed, non-discipline specific dissection guide have been identified by students and instructors in anatomy curricula. The objective of this project was to evaluate the effect of using a digital, PT specific dissection guide on examination performance and student satisfaction. A digital guide was developed that incorporated improvements based on observations of student experiences using a printed guide. The digital guide covered two lower extremity regional dissections and was distributed for use during the summer 2017 course. Enhancements included clarification of dissection procedures, formative quizzes, image galleries, embedded videos, and a glossary of terms. Students used a printed guide for all other dissections in the course. The percentage of correct answers from practical examinations was calculated and compared between summer of 2015 (print) and 2017 (digital) courses. A survey consisting of nineteen five-point Likert items was distributed. The percentage of correct answers was significantly higher for the digital guide (91.7 ± 7.11%) compared with the print guide (84.2 ± 9.51%, P < 0.0001). On the survey, the median item rating was strongly agree for two, agree for fifteen, and neither agree or disagree for two. These results suggest that developing a curriculum specific, digital guide was effective in improving student knowledge and satisfaction. These results encourage development of additional content specific guides in a digital format. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40670-020-01000-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Although numerous online resources for gross anatomy are available, most feature two-dimensional photographs generated by traditional cameras. To determine whether the incorporation of light field photographs (images with an adjustable focal point) into an online anatomy resource would result in improved learning beyond traditional photographs, two online learning modules on the gross anatomy of the orbit were created. The modules were identical in content except for the type of photography used (traditional = control; light field = experimental). Students were randomly assigned into two groups and viewed one of the two learning modules. Pre- and post-quizzes comprised of a mixture of questions involving a low and high degree (rated by experienced faculty) of spatial difficulty were administered. A survey was distributed to assess student evaluations of the module. Students (N = 49; 26 control, 23 experimental) demonstrated increased quiz scores from pre- (control = 34.6 ± 15.6%, experimental = 24.3 ± 16.5%) to post-quizzes (control = 77.3 ± 20.7%, experimental = 71.3 ± 17.9%, P