Search

Purpose: An important factor when considering the use of interventional cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging during cardiac procedures is the trade-off between imaging dose and image quality. Accordingly, Adaptive CaRdiac cOne BEAm computed Tomography (ACROBEAT) presents an alternative acquisition method, adapting the gantry velocity and projection rate of CBCT imaging systems in accordance with a patient's electrocardiogram (ECG) signal in real-time. The aim of this study was to experimentally investigate that ACROBEAT acquisitions deliver improved image quality compared to conventional cardiac CBCT imaging protocols with fewer projections acquired. Methods: The Siemens ARTIS pheno (Siemens Healthcare, GmbH, Germany), a robotic CBCT C-arm system, was used to compare ACROBEAT with a commercially available conventional cardiac imaging protocol that utilizes multisweep retrospective ECG-gated acquisition. For ACROBEAT, real-time control of the gantry position was enabled through the Siemens Test Automation Control system. ACROBEAT and conventional image acquisitions of the CIRS Dynamic Cardiac Phantom were performed, using five patient-measured ECG traces. The traces had average heart rates of 56, 64, 76, 86, and 100 bpm. The total number of acquired projections was compared between the ACROBEAT and conventional acquisition methods. The image quality was assessed via the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), structural similarity index (SSIM), and root-mean square error (RMSE). Results: Compared to the conventional protocol, ACROBEAT reduced the total number of projections acquired by 90%. The visual image quality provided by the ACROBEAT acquisitions, across all traces, matched or improved compared to conventional acquisition and was independent of the patient's heart rate. Across all traces, ACROBEAT averaged 1.4 times increase in the CNR, a 23% increase in the SSIM and a 29% decrease in the RMSE compared to conventional and was independent of the patient's heart rate. Conclusion: Adaptive patient imaging is feasible on a clinical robotic CBCT system, delivering higher quality images while reducing the number of projections acquired by 90% compared to conventional cardiac imaging protocols.

Background Fiducial markers are used as surrogates for tumor location during radiation therapy treatment. Developments in lung fiducial marker and implantation technology have provided a means to insert markers endobronchially for tracking of lung tumors. This study quantifies the surrogacy uncertainty (SU) when using endobronchially implanted markers as a surrogate for lung tumor position. Methods We evaluated SU for 17 patients treated in a prospective electromagnetic-guided MLC tracking trial. Tumor and markers were segmented on all phases of treatment planning 4DCTs and all frames of pretreatment kilovoltage fluoroscopy acquired from lateral and frontal views. The difference in tumor and marker position relative to end-exhale position was calculated as the SU for both imaging methods and the distributions of uncertainties analyzed. Results The mean (range) tumor motion amplitude in the 4DCT scan was 5.9 mm (1.7-11.7 mm) in the superior-inferior (SI) direction, 2.2 mm (0.9-5.5 mm) in the left-right (LR) direction, and 3.9 mm (1.2-12.9 mm) in the anterior-posterior (AP) direction. Population-based analysis indicated symmetric SU centered close to 0 mm, with maximum 5th/95th percentile values over all axes of -2.0 mm/2.1 mm with 4DCT, and -2.3/1.3 mm for fluoroscopy. There was poor correlation between the SU measured with 4DCT and that measured with fluoroscopy on a per-patient basis. We observed increasing SU with increasing surrogate motion. Based on fluoroscopy analysis, the mean (95% CI) SU was 5% (2%-8%) of the motion magnitude in the SI direction, 16% (6%-26%) of the motion magnitude in the LR direction, and 33% (23%-42%) of the motion magnitude in the AP direction. There was no dependence of SU on marker distance from the tumor. Conclusion We have quantified SU due to use of implanted markers as surrogates for lung tumor motion. Population 95th percentile range are up to 2.3 mm, indicating the approximate contribution of SU to total geometric uncertainty. SU was relatively small compared with the SI motion, but substantial compared with LR and AP motion. Due to uncertainty in estimations of patient-specific SU, it is recommended that population-based margins are used to account for this component of the total geometric uncertainty.

Purpose High quality radiotherapy is challenging in cases where multiple targets with independent motion are simultaneously treated. A real-time tumor tracking system that can simultaneously account for the motion of two targets was developed and characterized. Methods The multitarget tracking system was implemented on a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-linac and utilized multi-leaf collimator (MLC) tracking to adapt the radiation beam to phantom targets reproducing motion with prostate and lung motion traces. Multitarget tracking consisted of three stages: (a) pretreatment aperture segmentation where the treatment aperture was divided into segments corresponding to each target, (b) MR imaging where the positions of the two targets were localized, and (c) MLC tracking where an updated treatment aperture was calculated. Electronic portal images (EPID) acquired during irradiation were analyzed to characterize geometric uncertainty and tracking latency. Results Multitarget MLC tracking effectively accounted for the motion of both targets during treatment. The root-mean-square error between the centers of the targets and the centers of the corresponding MLC leaves were reduced from 5.5 mm without tracking to 2.7 mm with tracking for lung motion traces and reduced from 4.2 to 1.4 mm for prostate motion traces. The end-to-end latency of tracking was measured to be 328 ± 44 ms. Conclusions We have demonstrated the first experimental implementation of MLC tracking for multiple targets having independent motion. This technology takes advantage of the imaging capabilities of MRI-linacs and would allow treatment margins to be reduced in cases where multiple targets are simultaneously treated.

Purpose: Interventional treatments of aneurysms in the carotid artery are increasingly being supplemented with three-dimensional (3D) x-ray imaging. The 3D imaging provides additional information on device sizing and stent malapposition during the procedure. Standard 3D x-ray image acquisition is a one-size fits all model, exposing patients to additional radiation and results in images that may have cardiac-induced motion blur around the artery. Here, we investigate the potential of a novel dynamic imaging technique Adaptive CaRdiac cOne BEAm computed Tomography (ACROBEAT) to personalize image acquisition by adapting the gantry velocity and projection rate in real-time to changes in the patient's electrocardiogram (ECG) trace. Methods: We compared the total number of projections acquired, estimated carotid artery widths and image quality between ACROBEAT and conventional (single rotation fixed gantry velocity and acquisition rate, no ECG-gating) scans in a simulation study and a proof-of-concept physical phantom experimental study. The simulation study dataset consisted of an XCAT digital software phantom programmed with five patient-measured ECG traces and artery motion curves. The ECG traces had average heart rates of 56, 64, 76, 86, and 100 bpm. To validate the concept experimentally, we designed and manufactured the physical phantom from an 8-mm diameter silicon rubber tubing cast into Phytagel. An artery motion curve and the ECG trace with an average heart rate of 56 bpm was passed through the phantom. To implement ACROBEAT on the Siemens ARTIS pheno angiography system for the proof-of-concept experimental study, the Siemens Test Automation Control System was used. The total number of projections acquired and estimated carotid artery widths were compared between the ACROBEAT and conventional scans. As the ground truth was available for the simulation studies, the image quality metrics of Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Structural Similarity Index (SSIM) were also utilized to assess image quality. Results: In the simulation study, on average, ACROBEAT reduced the number of projections acquired by 63%, reduced carotid width estimation error by 65%, reduced RMSE by 11% and improved SSIM by 27% compared to conventional scans. In the proof-of-concept experimental study, ACROBEAT enabled a 60% reduction in the number of projections acquired and reduced carotid width estimation error by 69% compared to a conventional scan. Conclusion: A simulation and proof-of-concept experimental study was completed applying a novel dynamic imaging protocol, ACROBEAT, to imaging the carotid artery. The ACROBEAT results showed significantly improved image quality with fewer projections, offering potential applications to intracranial interventional procedures negatively affected by cardiac motion.

No abstract. A point / counterpoint article on the merits of ultra-high dose rate radiation therapy.

© 2019 American Association of Physicists in Medicine Purpose: Kilovoltage intrafraction monitoring (KIM) allows for real-time image guidance for tracking tumor motion in six-degrees-of-freedom (6DoF) on a standard linear accelerator. This study assessed the geometric accuracy and precision of KIM used to guide patient treatments in the TROG 15.01 multi-institutional Stereotactic Prostate Ablative Radiotherapy with KIM trial and investigated factors affecting accuracy and precision. Methods: Fractions from 44 patients with prostate cancer treated using KIM-guided SBRT were analyzed across four institutions, on two different linear accelerator models and two different beam models (6 MV and 10 MV FFF). The geometric accuracy and precision of KIM was assessed from over 33 000 images (translation) and over 9000 images (rotation) by comparing the real-time measured motion to retrospective kV/MV triangulation. Factors potentially affecting accuracy, including contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of kV images and incorrect marker segmentation, were also investigated. Results: The geometric accuracy and precision did not depend on treatment institution, beam model or motion magnitude, but was correlated with gantry angle. The centroid geometric accuracy and precision of the KIM system for SABR prostate treatments was 0.0 ± 0.5, 0.0 ± 0.4 and 0.1 ± 0.3 mm for translation, and −0.1 ± 0.6°, −0.1 ± 1.4° and −0.1 ± 1.0° for rotation in the AP, LR and SI directions respectively. Centroid geometric error exceeded 2 mm for 0.05% of this dataset. No significant relationship was found between large geometric error and CNR or marker segmentation correlation. Conclusions: This study demonstrated the ability of KIM to locate the prostate with accuracy below other uncertainties in radiotherapy treatments, and the feasibility for KIM to be implemented across multiple institutions.

Purpose Dose deposition measurements for parallel MRI-linacs have previously only shown comparisons between 0 T and a single available magnetic field. The Australian MRI-Linac consists of a magnet coupled with a dual energy linear accelerator and a 120 leaf Multi-Leaf Collimator with the radiation beam parallel to the magnetic field. Two different magnets, with field strengths of 1 and 1.5 T, were used during prototyping. This work aims to characterize the impact of the magnetic field at 1 and 1.5 T on dose deposition, possible by comparing dosimetry measured at both magnetic field strengths to measurements without the magnetic field. Methods Dose deposition measurements focused on a comparison of beam quality (TPR20/10 ), PDD, profiles at various depths, surface doses, and field size output factors. Measurements were acquired at 0, 1, and 1.5 T. Beam quality was measured using an ion chamber in solid water at isocenter with appropriate TPR20/10 buildup. PDDs and profiles were acquired via EBT3 film placed in solid water either parallel or perpendicular to the radiation beam. Films at surface were used to determine surface dose. Output factors were measured in solid water using an ion chamber at isocenter with 10 cm solid water buildup. Results Beam quality was within ±0.5% of the 0 T value for the 1 and 1.5 T magnetic field strengths. PDDs and profiles showed agreement for the three magnetic field strengths at depths beyond 20 mm. Deposited dose increased at shallower depths due to electron focusing. Output factors showed agreement within 1%. Conclusion Dose deposition at depth for a parallel MRI-linac was not significantly impacted by either a 1 or 1.5 T magnetic field. PDDs and profiles at shallow depths and surface dose measurements showed significant differences between 0, 1, and 1.5 T due to electron focusing.

Purpose As the predominant driver of respiratory motion, the diaphragm represents a key surrogate for motion management during the irradiation of thoracic cancers. Existing approaches to diaphragm tracking often produce phase-based estimates, suffer from lateral side failures or are not executable in real-time. In this paper, we present an algorithm that continuously produces real-time estimates of three-dimensional (3D) diaphragm position using kV images acquired on a standard linear accelerator. Methods Patient-specific 3D diaphragm models were generated via automatic segmentation on end-exhale four-dimensional-computed tomography (4D-CT) images. The estimated trajectory of diaphragmatic motion, referred to as the principal motion vector, was obtained by registering end-exhale to end-inhale 4D-CT images. Two-dimensional (2D) diaphragm masks were generated by forward-projecting 3D models over the complement of angles spanned during kV image acquisition. For each kV image, diaphragm position was determined by shifting angle-matched 2D masks along the principal motion vector and selecting the position of highest contrast on a vertical difference image. Retrospective analysis was performed using 22 cone beam CT (CBCT) image sequences for six lung cancer patients across two datasets. Given the current lack of objective ground truth for diaphragm position, our algorithm was evaluated by examining its ability to track implanted markers. Simple linear regression was used to construct 3D marker motion models and estimation errors were computed as the difference between estimated and ground truth marker positions. Additionally, Pearson correlation coefficients were used to characterize diaphragm-marker correlation. Results The mean ± standard deviation of the estimation errors across all image sequences was -0.1 ± 0.7 mm, -0.1 ± 1.8 mm and 0.2 ± 1.4 mm in the LR, SI, and AP directions respectively. The 95th percentile of the absolute errors ranged over 0.5-3.1 mm, 1.6-6.7 mm, and 1.2-4.0 mm in the LR, SI, and AP directions, respectively. The mean ± standard deviation of diaphragm-marker correlations over all image sequences was -0.07 ± 0.57, 0.67 ± 0.49, and 0.29 ± 0.52 in the LR, SI, and AP directions, respectively. Diaphragm-marker correlation was observed to be highly dependent on marker position. Mean correlation along the SI axis ranged over 0.91-0.93 for markers situated in the lower lobes of the lung, while correlations ranging over -0.51-0.79 were observed for markers situated in the upper and middle lobes. Conclusion This work advances a new approach to real-time direct diaphragm tracking in realistic treatment scenarios. By achieving continuous estimates of diaphragmatic motion, the proposed method has applications for both markerless tumor tracking and respiratory binning in 4D-CBCT.