Search

Background: Cardiac MRI has become the gold‐standard imaging technique for assessing cardiovascular morphology and function. In spite of this, its slow data acquisition process presents imaging challenges due to the motion from heartbeats, respiration, and blood flow. In recent studies, deep learning (DL) algorithms have shown promising results for the task of image reconstruction. However, there have been instances where they have introduced artifacts that may be misinterpreted as pathologies or may obscure the detection of pathologies. Therefore, it is important to obtain a metric, such as the uncertainty of the network output, that identifies such artifacts. However, this can be quite challenging for large‐scale image reconstruction problems such as dynamic multi‐coil non‐Cartesian MRI. Purpose: To efficiently quantify uncertainties of a physics‐informed DL‐based image reconstruction method for a large‐scale accelerated 2D multi‐coil dynamic radial MRI reconstruction problem, and demonstrate the benefits of physics‐informed DL over model‐agnostic DL in reducing uncertainties while at the same time improving image quality. Methods: We extended a recently proposed physics‐informed 2D U‐Net that learns spatio‐temporal slices (named XT‐YT U‐Net), and employed it for the task of uncertainty quantification (UQ) by using Monte Carlo dropout and a Gaussian negative log‐likelihood loss function. Our data comprised 2D dynamic MR images acquired with a radial balanced steady‐state free precession sequence. The XT‐YT U‐Net, which allows for training with a limited amount of data, was trained and validated on a dataset of 15 healthy volunteers, and further tested on data from four patients. An extensive comparison between physics‐informed and model‐agnostic neural networks (NNs) concerning the obtained image quality and uncertainty estimates was performed. Further, we employed calibration plots to assess the quality of the UQ. Results: The inclusion of the MR‐physics model of data acquisition as a building block in the NN architecture led to higher image quality (NRMSE: −33±8.2%$-33 \pm 8.2 \%$, PSNR: 6.3±1.3%$6.3 \pm 1.3 \%$, and SSIM: 1.9±0.96%$1.9 \pm 0.96 \%$), lower uncertainties (−46±8.7%$-46 \pm 8.7 \%$), and, based on the calibration plots, an improved UQ compared to its model‐agnostic counterpart. Furthermore, the UQ information can be used to differentiate between anatomical structures (e.g., coronary arteries, ventricle boundaries) and artifacts. Conclusions: Using an XT‐YT U‐Net, we were able to quantify uncertainties of a physics‐informed NN for a high‐dimensional and computationally demanding 2D multi‐coil dynamic MR imaging problem. In addition to improving the image quality, embedding the acquisition model in the network architecture decreased the reconstruction uncertainties as well as quantitatively improved the UQ. The UQ provides additional information to assess the performance of different network approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: In the past, dictionary learning (DL) and sparse coding (SC) have been proposed for the regularization of image reconstruction problems. The regularization is given by a sparse approximation of all image patches using a learned dictionary, that is, an overcomplete set of basis functions learned from data. Despite its competitiveness, DL and SC require the tuning of two essential hyperparameters: the sparsity level S — the number of basis functions of the dictionary, called atoms, which are used to approximate each patch, and K — the overall number of such atoms in the dictionary. These two hyperparameters usually have to be chosen a priori and are determined by repetitive and computationally expensive experiments. Furthermore, the final reported values vary depending on the specific situation. As a result, the clinical application of the method is limited, as standardized reconstruction protocols have to be used. Methods: In this work, we use adaptive DL and propose a novel adaptive sparse coding algorithm for two‐dimensional (2D) radial cine MR image reconstruction. Using adaptive DL and adaptive SC, the optimal dictionary size K as well as the optimal sparsity level S are chosen dependent on the considered data. Results: Our three main results are the following: First, adaptive DL and adaptive SC deliver results which are comparable or better than the most widely used nonadaptive version of DL and SC. Second, the time needed for the regularization is accelerated due to the fact that the sparsity level S is never overestimated. Finally, the a priori choice of S and K is no longer needed but is optimally chosen dependent on the data under consideration. Conclusions: Adaptive DL and adaptive SC can highly facilitate the application of DL‐ and SC‐based regularization methods. While in this work we focused on 2D radial cine MR image reconstruction, we expect the method to be applicable to different imaging modalities as well. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]