Search

This open-label, prospective, observational study aimed to evaluate disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), PML-RARα polymerase chain reaction (PCR) monitoring and safety in elderly patients with de novo acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) who were treated with either arsenic trioxide (As2O3) or medium-dose cytosine arabinoside (MiDAC) as frontline consolidation regimens. A total of 167 patients (age≥65 years old) received all-trans retinoic acid + daunorubicin as induction therapy. Of these patients, 22 died before attaining complete remission; the remaining 145 subjects received MiDAC- or As2O3-based consolidation therapy. As2O3 was superior to MiDAC for improving DFS and OS. This benefit appeared to result from the longer 5-year DFS (92.0 vs. 69.1%, P<0.01) and OS (94.5 vs. 79.7%, P<0.05) of As2O3 compared to MiDAC. PCR monitoring demonstrated that As2O3 promoted a lower positive rate than MiDAC (21.7 vs. 4.5%, P<0.05), but this treatment had no advantage for maintaining a low positive rate in the high-risk group. The most common life-threatening adverse drug effects in patients with MiDAC were platelet counts<25×10(9)/L (85.7%), leukocyte counts<1.0×10(9)/L (81.4%) and severe infection (84.3%). In contrast, the As2O3 regimen rarely caused leukocyte counts<1.0×10(9)/L (22.7%, P<0.01), platelet counts<25×10(9)/L (37.3%, P<0.01) or severe infection (21.3%, P<0.01). These data confirm that MiDAC should not be added during the initial consolidation of patients with APL because this treatment is far less effective, particularly in patients with a low-risk profile, and far more toxic than As2O3.

The open-label, prospective, observational study aimed to evaluate whether the addition of maintenance rituximab (MR) improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), after fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) for cytogenetic risk-tailored elderly patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Enrolled 201 patients (ages 65-84 years) who received FCR and gained an overall response. One hundred and four of 201 patients were in the observation (OBS) arm while 97/201 patients continued to receive MR therapy. After FCR, no more benefits were provided by MR versus OBS in cytogenetic better intermediate-risk cohort. PFS at 10 years reached 68.6 versus 58.1 % (P > 0.05). Ten-year OS was 81.8 versus 74.6 % (P > 0.05). However, the improvement of PFS and OS were as dramatic as the improvements of being MR treating versus OBS mainly in the poor-risk cohort. PFS at 10 years reached 57.1 versus 22.7 % (P < 0.01), and 10-year OS was 71.2 versus 41.7 % (P < 0.01). Compared with OBS, no severe hematologic adverse events (AEs) (Grades 3-4) appeared in patients with MR; only some mild non-hematologic AEs incurred (nausea-vomiting 0.96 %, allergy 1.9 % and infection 1.9 %) during the maintenance treatment. The study showed that MR improved 10-year RFS and OS for cytogenetic poor-risk patients with CLL.

The open-label, prospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety for standard intensive chemotherapy compared with attenuated therapy in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). A total of 297 patients between 65 and 82 years were enrolled in the study. The 141 patients received standard-dose therapy (daunorubicin 45 mg/m(2) × 3 days with cytarabine 100 mg/m(2) × 7 days for induction therapy, while post-induction therapy consisted of high-dose cytarabine 1.5 g/m(2) × 4 days), and the attenuated treatment (daunorubicin 30 mg/m(2) × 3 days with cytarabine 75 mg/m(2) × 7 days for induction therapy, while post-induction therapy consisted of attenuated high-dose Ara-C 1.0 g/m(2) × 3 days) was administered to the remaining 156 patients, based on a random number assigned. Total 168 patients (56.6%) achieved complete remission with an incomplete blood recovery (CR)/CRi. No significant differences were observed between the two treatments (P = 0.60). Attenuated chemotherapy improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared to standard-dose therapy; 5-year OS values for these two groups were 39 and 24 months, respectively (P < 0.001), and the PFS values for these two groups were 35 versus 23 months (P < 0.001). In addition, the attenuated treatment with a poor risk profile overcame the negative impact and yielded OS and PFS values similar to those of the standard-dose chemotherapy with a better-to-intermediate risk profile. Five-year OS values for these two groups were 28 versus 28 months (P = 0.89), and the 5-year PFS values were 27 and 28 months, respectively (P = 0.89). The most common adverse drug effect for chemotherapy was agranulocytosis (98.3%). There was a significant difference in early mortality between the attenuated and standard-dose treatment groups (0.64% vs. 7.1%, respectively, P < 0.01). Standard intensive chemotherapy is less effective and far more toxic than attenuated induction and post-induction regimen in elderly patients with AML.

The purpose was to investigate the role of EphB4 in imatinib (IM) resistance and the mechanism responsible for homoharringtonine (HHT) contributing to imatinib sensitivity for a chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) cell lines. We established cell lines from a patient with CML at the time of first diagnosis and relapsed phase and designated them as NPhA1 and NPhA2, respectively. Stable underexpressing EphB4 cells (NPhA2-sh) were obtained. The activated signal proteins in cells were tested by Western blot. The EphB4 was overexpressed in IM-resistant NPhA2 in comparison with the NPhA1 cell line, but the expression of EphB4 mRNA and protein significantly decreased in knockdown NPhA2-EphB4-sh cells compared with NPhA2 and NPhA1 (P < 0.001) cell lines. NPhA2-EphB4-sh cells were sensitive to IM (IC50 0.93 mg/L), and NPhA2 showed IM resistance (IC50 5.45 mg/L) (P < 0.001). Meanwhile, phospho-Rac1/cdc42 was significantly increased in NPhA2 cells compared to NPhA2-EphB4-sh (P < 0.001). The apoptosis rate reached 58.71 ± 2.39 % with NPhA2 cells incubated with HHT + IM, which was higher than NPhA2 cells incubated with IM alone (P = 0.002). IC50 of NPhA2 cells incubated with IM was 5.45 mg/L. However, co-stimulation with HHT + IM decreased the IC50 of NPhA2 cells from 5.45 to 1.17 mg/L (P < 0.001). Furthermore, HHT blocked the expressions of EphB4/RhoA, but did not down-regulate the phospho-MEK/ERK in NPhA2 cells. The overexpression of EphB4 contributed to IM resistance in CML line cells. EphB4/RhoA may be a new marker of IM resistance. HHT + IM gained more treatment advantages than IM alone by blocking EphB4/RhoA pathways in CML cell lines.

The purpose of the study was to evaluate event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS) and safety for early addition of arsenic trioxide (As(2)O(3)) as frontline consolidation therapy compared to high-dose arabinoside (HiDAC) in adult patients with de novo acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). 271 patients (aged 17-65 years) received consolidation therapy containing As(2)O(3) (two 21-day courses) or HiDAC regimen. EFS at 5 years was 75% versus 54% (P < 0.001), and OS at 5 years was 83% versus 71% (P = 0.002) in As(2)O(3) and HiDAC treatment arms. 139 patients treated with As(2)O(3), EFS at 5 years reached 79% versus 56% (P = 0.014), but OS at 5 years was 77% versus 84% (P = 0.32) in low-risk (WBC ≤ 10 × 10(9)/L) and high-risk (WBC > 10 × 10(9)/L) cohorts. Further, patients treated with As(2)O(3) rarely incurred agranulocytosis (1.4%, P < 0.001), or severe infection (0.7%, P < 0.001). It is still very well tolerated compared to HiDAC. We confirmed that As(2)O(3) as a first-line consolidation regimen provided significant benefits of OS to patients with APL. The As(2)O(3) regimen made low-risk patients gain more EFS benefits than high-risk group. The high-risk cohort receiving As(2)O(3) overcame the negative impact, yielding OS similar to that for with the low-risk patients treated with As(2)O(3).

The purpose of the study was to compare the antitumor efficacy and safety profile of high-dose homoharringtonine as induction and post-induction therapy compared to either standard-dose homoharringtonine or daunorubicin in elderly patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. A total of 254 patients, age range 60-77 years received induction and post-induction therapy containing daunorubicin, standard-dose homoharringtonine, or high-dose homoharringtonine. After one course of induction therapy, the overall complete remission rate was similar between treatment arms (58.7%, P = .92). Among 161 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (non-M5 subtype), estimated median overall survival was 39, 29, and 37 months, respectively, in the daunorubicin, standard-dose homoharringtonine, and high-dose homoharringtonine treatment groups (P = .53). In the 93 patients with acute myeloid leukemia-M5 subtype, there was a significant difference in estimated median overall survival: 24, 24, and 52 months, respectively, in the daunorubicin, standard-dose homoharringtonine, and high-dose homoharringtonine treatment groups (P = .003). There was no significant difference in drug-related adverse events between treatment arms. High-dose homoharringtonine does not clearly increase the complete remission rate of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia. However, in the subset of elderly patients with acute monocytic leukemia, high-dose homoharringtonine as a first-line regimen prolonged overall survival with minimal toxicity.