Search

The Dynamiker® Fungus (1-3)-β-D-Glucan Assay (D-BDG) has recently become available in the Western Hemisphere for the diagnosis of invasive fungal disease (IFD). Evaluations of its performance for Pneumocystis pneumonia (PcP) are limited. A retrospective evaluation of D-BDG diagnosis of PcP was performed (23 PcP cases and 23 controls). Sensitivity and specificity were 87% and 70%, respectively, reducing the positivity threshold to 45 pg/ml increased sensitivity (96%), whereas a threshold of 300 pg/ml increased specificity (96%). The performance of D-BDG for the detection of PcP is comparable to other IFD, but sensitivity is below that required to confidently exclude PcP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Awide array of PCR tests has been developed to aid the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis (IA), providing technical diversity but limiting standardisation and acceptance. Methodological recommendations for testing blood samples using PCR exist, based on achieving optimal assay sensitivity to help exclude IA. Conversely, when testingmore invasive samples (BAL, biopsy, CSF) emphasis is placed on confirming disease, so analytical specificity is paramount. This multicenter study examined the analytical specificity of PCR methods for detecting IA by blind testing a panel of DNA extracted from a various fungal species to explore the range of Aspergillus species that could be detected, but also potential cross reactivity with other fungal species. Positivity rates were calculated and regression analysis was performed to determine any associations between technical specifications and performance. The accuracy of Aspergillus genus specific assays was 71.8%, significantly greater (P < .0001) than assays specific for individual Aspergillus species (47.2%). For genus specific assays themost often missed species were A. lentulus (25.0%), A. versicolor (24.1%), A. terreus (16.1%), A. flavus (15.2%), A. niger (13.4%), and A. fumigatus (6.2%). There was a significant positive association between accuracy and using an Aspergillus genus PCR assay targeting the rRNA genes (P = .0011). Conversely, there was a significant association between rRNA PCR targets and false positivity (P = .0032). To conclude current Aspergillus PCR assays are better suited for detecting A. fumigatus, with inferior detection ofmost other Aspergillus species. The use of an Aspergillus genus specific PCR assay targeting the rRNA genes is preferential. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Galactomannan enzyme immune assay (GM EIA) is a nonculture test for detecting invasive aspergillosis (IA) forming a key part of diagnosis and management. Recent reports have questioned the reproducibility of indices after sample storage. To investigate this, 198 serum samples (72 from cases and 126 from controls) and 61 plasma samples (24 from cases and 37 from controls), initially tested between 2010 and 2013, were retested to determine any change in index. Data were also collected on circulatory protein levels for false-positive serum samples. Serum indices significantly declined on retesting (median: initial, 0.50, retest, 0.23; P < 0.0001). This was shown to be diagnosis dependent as the decline was apparent on retesting of control samples (median: initial 0.50, retest 0.12; P < 0.0001), but was not evident with case samples (median: initial, 0.80, retest, 0.80; P = 0.724). Plasma samples showed little change on reanalysis after long-term storage at 4◦C. Retesting after freezing showed a decrease in index values for controls (median: initial 0.40, retest 0.26; P = 0.0505), but no significant change in cases. Circulatory proteins showed a correlation between serum albumin concentration and difference in index value on retesting. Overall, this study suggests that a lack of reproducibility in GM EIA positivity is only significant when disease is absent. Retesting after freezing helps to differentiate false-positive GM EIA results and, with consecutive positivity, could help to improve accuracy in predicting disease status. The freezing of samples prior to testing could potentially reduce false-positivity rates and the need to retest. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PCR is a useful tool to aid in the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis. However, it is essential that an optimal method be agreed to allow inclusion in future consensus diagnosis criteria. It should be used in conjunction with other methods (e.g., galatomannan (GM) ELISA and high resolution computed tomography (HRCT)) to enhance the opportunity for detection of this devastating infection. This manuscript will try to highlight the benefits but mainly the limitations occurring throughout the process of molecular testing. It will focus on real-time methods although many of the points will be relevant to block-based amplification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PCR is a useful tool to aid in the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis. However, it is essential that an optimal method be agreed to allow inclusion in future consensus diagnosis criteria. It should be used in conjunction with other methods (e.g., galatomannan (GM) ELISA and high resolution computed tomography (HRCT)) to enhance the opportunity for detection of this devastating infection. This manuscript will try to highlight the benefits but mainly the limitations occurring throughout the process of molecular testing. It will focus on real-time methods although many of the points will be relevant to block-based amplification.