Search

Objectives: This study focused on Finnish physicians' views of their undergraduate medical education. Differences between traditional and community-oriented medical faculties were examined and changes which had taken place during a 10-year follow-up period were also assessed., Methods: The study was based on data retrieved from a postal survey made among Finnish physicians in 1998. The study population consisted of all doctors who graduated between 1987 and 1996 (n=4926); those born on odd-numbered days were selected for this study (n=2492). A postal questionnaire and two reminders were sent to those selected, and 1822 questionnaires were returned, giving a response rate of 73.1%., Results: Physicians who graduated from the community-oriented faculties were more satisfied with their undergraduate medical education when compared with their colleagues graduating from traditional faculties. There were some differences between the universities with respect to education for hospital work. The teaching of primary health care, however, was clearly more effective in community-oriented faculties. The proportion of graduates who were satisfied with their primary care education was over 70% in community-oriented faculties, whereas in the traditional faculties it was only 35-45%., Conclusions: According to graduates, the community-oriented medical school curriculum better meets the needs of practising physicians than that in traditional faculties. In curriculum reforms, more emphasis should be placed on comprehensive medical education, which includes both primary and secondary health care.

The study focuses on Finnish doctors' views of their undergraduate medical education. In 1988, a study (Junior Physician 88 Study) involving all the doctors registered during the years 1977-1986 in Finland (n = 5208) was carried out. A questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 2632 doctors, and after two mailings 1745 questionnaires (66.3%) were returned. A total of 1334 gave at least one answer to the question: 'Where should special attention be paid in undergraduate medical education?' Five years later, in 1993, another study (Physician 93 Study) involving all medical doctors registered in Finland during the years 1982-1991 (n = 4671) was carried out. The same questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 2332 doctors, and after two reminders 1818 questionnaires (78.0%) were returned, and 1228 doctors also answered the open-ended question. Content analysis was used to analyse the answers qualitatively and quantitatively. About 90% of the answers could be classified into two main categories: practical skills and evaluation of subjects. The most common proposal for the improvement of undergraduate medical education was that the practical skills needed in general practice should be taught. More education in administration and health economics was also desired. Respondents said that preclinical and clinical studies should be more closely integrated. In answers to the open question, the course in public health was strongly criticized for being too theoretical. Learning of the core knowledge for medical practice was considered essential.