Search

CONTEXT There is increasing interest in establishing the medical humanities as core integrated provision in undergraduate medicine curricula, but sceptics point to the lack of evidence for their impact upon patient care. Further, the medical humanities culture has often failed to provide a convincing theoretical rationale for the inclusion of the arts and humanities in medical education. DISCUSSION Poor communication with colleagues and patients is the main factor in creating the conditions for medical error; this is grounded in a historically determined refusal of democracy within medical work. The medical humanities may play a critical role in educating for democracy in medical culture generally, and in improving communication in medical students specifically, as both demand high levels of empathy. Studies in the science of communication can provide a valuable evidence base justifying the inclusion of the medical humanities in the core curriculum. A case is made for the potential of the medical humanities – as a form of ‘adult play’– to educate for collaboration and tolerance of ambiguity or uncertainty, providing a key element of the longer-term democratising force necessary to change medical culture and promote safer practice. CONCLUSION The arts and humanities can provide important contextual media through which the lessons learned from the science of communication in medicine can be translated and promoted as forms of medical education.

Perhaps the most significant structural change in recent times in medicine is the shift from a dominance of men entering the profession to a dominance of women worldwide. However, while more women than men will soon be practicing medicine globally, there is a trend for women to work part-time, and women will still not access senior positions in many areas of medicine, including medical education. Surgery will still offer a male-dominated speciality.

Medical Education 2012:46: 153–162 Context Aphorisms are succinct sayings that offer advice. They have permanently coloured medical culture and inhabit it in the same way as uncertainty; they are acknowledged, but rarely explored. Little has been written analytically or critically about the meanings and purposes of aphorisms in contemporary medical education, especially as a processional activity that maintains tradition, but both adds to and reframes it. Discussion We note multiple purposes for medical aphorisms, including roles as heuristics (rules of thumb) for practice, and in the identity construction of the clinician within a community beset by professional uncertainty and accountability. We suggest that aphorisms should be cared for not simply as historical curiosities, but as renewable ways of creating an ‘art of memory’ in medical education, stimulating recognition and recall as aesthetic rhetorical devices. In this spirit, we encourage the development of aphorisms appropriate for 21st century medicine in a process that should include the involvement of patients in building a proxy public literacy to inform collaboration in clinical encounters. Conclusions We propose a novel framework for aphorisms, emphasising strategies to enhance or maximise clinical judgement and professional behaviour, affirm identities, and educate the public via the media.

Context Western medicine and medical techniques are being exported to all corners of the world at an increasing rate. In a parallel wave of globalisation, Western medical education is also making inroads into medical schools, hospitals and clinics across the world. Despite this rapidly expanding field of activity, there is no body of literature discussing the relationship between post-colonial theory and medical education. Discussion Although the potential benefits of international partnerships and collaborations in education are incontrovertible, many medical educators are sometimes too unreflecting about what they are doing when they advocate the export of Western curricula, educational approaches and teaching technologies. The Western medical curriculum is steeped in a particular set of cultural attitudes that are rarely questioned. We argue that, from a critical theoretical perspective, the unconsidered enterprise of globalising the medical curriculum risks coming to represent a ‘new wave’ of imperialism. Using examples from Japan, India and Southeast Asia, we show how medical schools in non-Western countries struggle with the ingrained cultural assumptions of some curricular innovations such as the objective structured clinical examination, problem-based learning and the teaching of clinical skills. Conclusions We need to develop greater understanding of the relationship between post-colonial studies and medical education if we are to prevent a new wave of imperialism through the unreflecting dissemination of conceptual frameworks and practices which assume that ‘metropolitan West is best’.

BACKGROUND Narrative inquiry is a form of qualitative research that takes story as either its raw data or its product. Science and narrative can be seen as two kinds of knowing, reflected in the distinction between evidence-based medicine derived from population studies and narrative-based medicine focused upon the single case. A similar tension exists in the field of narrative inquiry between cognitiveorientated analytical methods and affective-orientated methods of synthesis. AIMS This paper aims to make sense of narrative inquiry in clinical education through definition of narrative, articulation of a typology of narrative research approaches, and critical examination in particular of analytical methods, the dominant approach in the literature. The typology is illustrated by research examples, and the role of medical education in developing expertise in narrative inquiry is discussed. An argument is made that the tension between analysis of the structure of stories and empathic use of stories can be seen as productive, stimulating expertise encompassing both approaches. DISCUSSION Analytical methods tend to lose the concrete story and its emotional impact to abstract categorisations, which may claim explanatory value but often remain descriptive. Stemming from discomfort with more integrative methods derived from the humanities, a science-orientated medical education may privilege analytical methods over approaches of synthesis. Medical education can redress this imbalance through attention to thinking with stories to gain empathy for a patient’s experience of illness. Such an approach can complement understanding of story as discourse ) how narratives may be used rhetorically to manage both social interactions and identity.

Introduction The pre-registration house officer (PRHO) year can be seen as a formal apprenticeship into the profession of medicine, and as central to the identity construction of the doctor. The year characteristically involves rotation between specialties, including attachment to ward-based `firms', where consultants teach PRHOs. Discussion Teaching and learning in ward-based environments is under-researched, and the current literature displays a bias towards a psychological model of pedagogy that focuses upon transmission of knowledge and skills from one individual to another. Such a model offers a necessary, but not sufficient, explanation of how work-based learning occurs. Understanding the PRHO apprenticeship year should include reference to cultural dimensions to learning, especially socialisation into the profession. This constitutes an `extended' (or `hidden') curriculum model that may be theorised through contemporary ideas of activity learning within a `new apprenticeship' framework. Conclusion The dominant psychological model can lead to an expectation for a uniform method of teaching and learning in ward round contexts that (a) ignores important differences in educational climate between established communities of practice, and (b) orients both teachers and learners to one-to-one transmission and reception, rather than sensitising to how knowledge may be held across members of a working group. The latter shifts emphasis away from reception to issues of active access. PRHOs, as novices, are not relegated to passive learning roles, but may actively co-construct knowledge with experts, offering potential transformation of the practices of ward groups.

There is increasing interest in establishing the medical humanities as core integrated provision in undergraduate medicine curricula, but sceptics point to the lack of evidence for their impact upon patient care. Further, the medical humanities culture has often failed to provide a convincing theoretical rationale for the inclusion of the arts and humanities in medical education.Poor communication with colleagues and patients is the main factor in creating the conditions for medical error; this is grounded in a historically determined refusal of democracy within medical work. The medical humanities may play a critical role in educating for democracy in medical culture generally, and in improving communication in medical students specifically, as both demand high levels of empathy. Studies in the science of communication can provide a valuable evidence base justifying the inclusion of the medical humanities in the core curriculum. A case is made for the potential of the medical humanities--as a form of 'adult play'--to educate for collaboration and tolerance of ambiguity or uncertainty, providing a key element of the longer-term democratising force necessary to change medical culture and promote safer practice.The arts and humanities can provide important contextual media through which the lessons learned from the science of communication in medicine can be translated and promoted as forms of medical education.

Women are in the majority in terms of entry to medical schools worldwide and will soon represent the majority of working doctors. This has been termed the 'feminising' of medicine. In medical education, such gender issues tend to be restricted to discussions of demographic changes and structural inequalities based on a biological reading of gender. However, in contemporary social sciences, gender theory has moved beyond both biology and demography to include cultural issues of gendered ways of thinking. Can contemporary feminist thought drawn from the social sciences help medical educators to widen their appreciation and understanding of the feminising of medicine?Post-structuralist feminist critique, drawn from the social sciences, focuses on cultural practices, such as language use, that support a dominant patriarchy. Such a critique is not exclusive to women, but may be described as supporting a tender-minded approach to practice that is shared by both women and men. The demographic feminising of medicine may have limited effect in terms of changing both medical culture and medical education practices without causing radical change to entrenched cultural habits that are best described as patriarchal. Medical education currently suffers from male biases, such as those imposed by 'andragogy', or adult learning theory, and these can be positively challenged through post-structuralist feminist critique.Women doctors entering the medical workforce can resist and reformulate the current dominant patriarchy rather than reproducing it, supported by male feminists. Such a feminising of medicine can extend to medical education, but will require an appropriate theoretical framework to make sense of the new territory. The feminising of medical education informed by post-structuralist frameworks may provide a platform for the democratisation of medical culture and practices, further informing authentic patient-centred practices of care.

CONTEXT Medical education in the UK has recently undergone radical reform. Tomorrow's Doctors has prescribed undergraduate curriculum change and the Foundation Programme has overhauled postgraduate education. OBJECTIVES This study explored the experiences of junior doctors during their first year of clinical practice. In particular, the study sought to gain an understanding of how junior doctors experienced the transition from the role of student to that of practising doctor and how well their medical school education had prepared them for this. METHODS The study used qualitative methods comprising of semi-structured interviews and audio diary recordings with newly qualified doctors based at the Peninsula Foundation School in the UK. Purposive sampling was used and 31 of 186 newly qualified doctors self-selected from five hospital sites. All 31 participants were interviewed once and 17 were interviewed twice during the year. Ten of the participants also kept audio diaries. Interview and audio diary data were transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed with the aid of a qualitative data analysis software package. RESULTS The findings show that, despite recent curriculum reforms, most participants still found the transition stressful. Dealing with their newly gained responsibility, managing uncertainty, working in multi-professional teams, experiencing the sudden death of patients and feeling unsupported were important themes. However, the stress of transition was reduced by the level of clinical experience gained in the undergraduate years. CONCLUSIONS Medical schools need to ensure that students are provided with early exposure to clinical environments which allow for continuing 'meaningful' contact with patients and increasing opportunities to 'act up' to the role of junior doctor, even as students. Patient safety guidelines present a major challenge to achieving this, although with adequate supervision the two aims are not mutually exclusive. Further support and supervision should be made available to junior doctors in situations where they are dealing with the death of a patient and on surgical placements.

Background There is a mismatch between the broad range of learning theories offered in the wider education literature and a relatively narrow range of theories privileged in the medical education literature. The latter are usually described under the heading of ‘adult learning theory’. Methods This paper critically addresses the limitations of the current dominant learning theories informing medical education. An argument is made that such theories, which address how an individual learns, fail to explain how learning occurs in dynamic, complex and unstable systems such as fluid clinical teams. Results Models of learning that take into account distributed knowing, learning through time as well as space, and the complexity of a learning environment including relationships between persons and artefacts, are more powerful in explaining and predicting how learning occurs in clinical teams. Learning theories may be privileged for ideological reasons, such as medicine's concern with autonomy. Conclusions Where an increasing amount of medical education occurs in workplace contexts, sociocultural learning theories offer a best-fit exploration and explanation of such learning. We need to continue to develop testable models of learning that inform safe work practice. One type of learning theory will not inform all practice contexts and we need to think about a range of fit-for-purpose theories that are testable in practice. Exciting current developments include dynamicist models of learning drawing on complexity theory.

Narrative inquiry is a form of qualitative research that takes story as either its raw data or its product. Science and narrative can be seen as two kinds of knowing, reflected in the distinction between evidence-based medicine derived from population studies and narrative-based medicine focused upon the single case. A similar tension exists in the field of narrative inquiry between cognitive-orientated analytical methods and affective-orientated methods of synthesis.This paper aims to make sense of narrative inquiry in clinical education through definition of 'narrative', articulation of a typology of narrative research approaches, and critical examination in particular of analytical methods, the dominant approach in the literature. The typology is illustrated by research examples, and the role of medical education in developing expertise in narrative inquiry is discussed. An argument is made that the tension between analysis of the structure of stories and empathic use of stories can be seen as productive, stimulating expertise encompassing both approaches.Analytical methods tend to lose the concrete story and its emotional impact to abstract categorizations, which may claim explanatory value but often remain descriptive. Stemming from discomfort with more integrative methods derived from the humanities, a science-orientated medical education may privilege analytical methods over approaches of synthesis. Medical education can redress this imbalance through attention to 'thinking with stories' to gain empathy for a patient's experience of illness. Such an approach can complement understanding of story as discourse - how narratives may be used rhetorically to manage both social interactions and identity.

Background Close noticing, as keen discrimination and judgement between qualities, is a key capability for work in visual domains in medicine. This generic capability is normally assumed, and its specifics are left to develop through experience, as traditional apprenticeship in a specialty. Discrimination is an outcome of learning in the affective domain, and introduces a vital aesthetic dimension to clinical work that aligns with the interests of the medical humanities. An aesthetic approach to clinical reasoning, however, remains largely unexplored as an explicit focus for medical education. Framework and practice paradoxes We offer a framework for an explicit education of perceptual discrimination in the visual domain as a form of practice ‘artistry’, turning a surface ‘looking’ into a deeper ‘seeing’. Such an education, however, raises certain paradoxes. While novices typically ‘see’ what they expect to see in visual images (sign and symptom), experts also make similar errors. Further, experts become familiar with the use of visual heuristics in diagnosis, such as vivid natural referents to aid in rapid pattern recognition in an encompassing diagnostic ‘glance’, yet this appears to defeat the first principle of describing what you see. Employing a model of imagination as a tacit form of knowing that ‘prepares’ and enhances perception, we suggest, however, that the judicious use of such heuristics can be positive. Moreover, the mechanics of the process of clinical judgement in visual domains can be detailed to inform educational agendas. A further paradox is that of experts using both idiosyncratic heuristics and protocol-driven practices, where these seem to offer contradictory approaches to gaining knowledge. We recognise this as a facet of medicine's inherent uncertainty, in the face of complex, ambiguous and unique material, that must be addressed through clinical education. Conclusion We equate ‘aesthetics’ with ‘sensibility’ and describe clinical expertise as ‘connoisseurship’ of informational images. Such connoisseurship, a particular form of knowing, can, in turn, be defined as an aesthetic sensibility informing practice artistry. It can be articulated and analysed to provide a basis for educational enhancement. Connoisseurship is not a technical-rational procedure but is inherently paradoxical and such paradox may be valued as an educational resource, rather than seen as a hindrance.

The pre-registration house officer (PRHO) year can be seen as a formal apprenticeship into the profession of medicine, and as central to the identity construction of the doctor. The year characteristically involves rotation between specialties, including attachment to ward-based 'firms', where consultants teach PRHOs.Teaching and learning in ward-based environments is under-researched, and the current literature displays a bias towards a psychological model of pedagogy that focuses upon transmission of knowledge and skills from one individual to another. Such a model offers a necessary, but not sufficient, explanation of how work-based learning occurs. Understanding the PRHO apprenticeship year should include reference to cultural dimensions to learning, especially socialisation into the profession. This constitutes an 'extended' (or 'hidden') curriculum model that may be theorised through contemporary ideas of activity learning within a 'new apprenticeship' framework.The dominant psychological model can lead to an expectation for a uniform method of teaching and learning in ward round contexts that (a) ignores important differences in educational climate between established communities of practice, and (b) orients both teachers and learners to one-to-one transmission and reception, rather than sensitising to how knowledge may be held across members of a working group. The latter shifts emphasis away from reception to issues of active access. PRHOs, as novices, are not relegated to passive learning roles, but may actively co-construct knowledge with experts, offering potential transformation of the practices of ward groups.